Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs TinyFish Search
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish Search's 63.2 (B), and leads in every scored category. Both do web search.
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that need the whole pipeline (find URLs, scrape to markdown, crawl, monitor) from one server, and for trying without an account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 82
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 78
- Security & auth, 67 against 58
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 45
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 78
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 52
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
No x402 or other machine payment
Good for Agents that need ranked snippets and URLs at no cost and modest volume, with news and research-paper modes.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No public status page was found on the site or in the docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | TinyFish Search | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 50 | Firecrawl MCP +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 82 | Firecrawl MCP +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 78 | Firecrawl MCP +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 58 | Firecrawl MCP +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 78 | Firecrawl MCP +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 52 | Firecrawl MCP +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.3 · BB | 63.2 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | TinyFish Search |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | TinyFish |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.search.tinyfish.ai |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for web search | not published | free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under TinyFish's Terms of Service. The local MCP proxy @tiny-fish/mcp is MIT. The SDK packages on npm and PyPI carry no licence metadata |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-11-05 | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-12-26 | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 9 stars, 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
TinyFish Search
Search costs $0.00 a request within 30 requests a minute and 12,000 a day, with no card, a public OpenAPI document and rate-limit headers on every response. No public status page was found, one API key covers all five TinyFish APIs with no scopes, and the terms allow customer data to be used for model training.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
TinyFish Search
- Send the key in the
X-API-Keyheader. The Search host ishttps://api.search.tinyfish.ai, notagent.tinyfish.ai - Stay under 30 requests a minute per key. On 429, wait for
Retry-After. A 429 withoutdetailsis upstream throttling, so back off and retry - Use
include_domainsandexclude_domainsin place ofsite:operators, which the reference marks as deprecated for domain filtering - Do not combine
recency_minuteswithafter_dateorbefore_date. Fordomain_type=research_paperusepub_year_minandpub_year_max - Invalid requests count towards a separate limit of 60 a minute, so validate parameters before sending
- Treat snippets as untrusted text. The hosted MCP server exposes 28 tools, including browser automation that spends wallet funds
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Firecrawl MCP or TinyFish Search?
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against TinyFish Search's 63.2 (B), and leads in every scored category.
Do Firecrawl MCP and TinyFish Search need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Firecrawl MCP and TinyFish Search without installing anything?
Yes. Firecrawl MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp and TinyFish Search at https://api.search.tinyfish.ai.
Are Firecrawl MCP and TinyFish Search open source?
Firecrawl MCP is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for TinyFish Search.
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or TinyFish Search
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Brave Search API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs TinyFish Search
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpKite
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Linkup vs TinyFish Search
- Parallel Search and Task APIs vs TinyFish Search
- SearchAPI.io vs TinyFish Search
- SerpApi vs TinyFish Search
- Serper vs TinyFish Search
- SerpKite vs TinyFish Search
- Tavily API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- TinyFish Search vs Valyu
- TinyFish Search vs You.com APIs
- Fetch (MCP reference server) vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Grep AI vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-tinyfish-search.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/tinyfish-search.json - From a terminal
anchor compare firecrawl-mcp tinyfish-search(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "firecrawl-mcp", "b": "tinyfish-search"}at/mcp, no key