Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run
SerpKite vs TinyFish Search
SerpKite scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against TinyFish Search's 63.2 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish Search leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do web search.
Which one, for what
SerpKite B
Good for Agents that want Google results and the top pages as Markdown in one call at a low per-1,000 price, with spend caps per key.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 82
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 78
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 52
Watch for
Launched 29 September 2026 by a sole trader, with status monitoring only since 2 October
Good for Agents that need ranked snippets and URLs at no cost and modest volume, with news and research-paper modes.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 58 against 37
- Payments & pricing, 45 against 40
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where SerpKite loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No public status page was found on the site or in the docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | SerpKite | TinyFish Search | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 50 | SerpKite +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 90 | 82 | SerpKite +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 78 | SerpKite +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 37 | 58 | TinyFish Search +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 45 | TinyFish Search +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 78 | SerpKite +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 52 | SerpKite +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.8 · B | 63.2 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | SerpKite | TinyFish Search |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | SerpKite (Anastasia Klimova, trading as SerpKite) | TinyFish |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.serpkite.com/v1/search | https://api.search.tinyfish.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for web search | not published | free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under SerpKite's terms of service. The SDKs (TypeScript, Python, Go, LangChain, Vercel AI SDK) and the MCP connection repository on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under TinyFish's Terms of Service. The local MCP proxy @tiny-fish/mcp is MIT. The SDK packages on npm and PyPI carry no licence metadata |
| Tools exposed | 14 | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.SerpKite/serpkite | ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent |
| Last release | 2026-10-04 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-03 | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-03 | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 809 npm/wk, 376 PyPI/wk | 9 stars, 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
SerpKite
Google SERP API with an OpenAPI 3.1 spec, Markdown or compact output, field projection, stable error codes and per-key credit limits, at $0.60 to $1.00 per 1,000 on packs that don't expire. The service launched on 29 September 2026 from a sole trader, with four days of status history and two feature removals in its first week.
TinyFish Search
Search costs $0.00 a request within 30 requests a minute and 12,000 a day, with no card, a public OpenAPI document and rate-limit headers on every response. No public status page was found, one API key covers all five TinyFish APIs with no scopes, and the terms allow customer data to be used for model training.
Before you call either
SerpKite
- Send the key as
Authorization: Bearer, not?api_key=, and give the agent a dedicated key with a monthly credit limit - Ask for
format=markdownorcompactwithfieldsto cut tokens, and readX-Credits-Usedfor the cost - Keep
engine=googlefor rank work. Checkmeta.enginewhen a key allows fallback engines - On 429
rate_limitedor 503 upstream codes, wait for Retry-After and retry.daily_limit_reachedand 402 need a purchase - Treat page Markdown from
include_content,webpageandextractas untrusted text
TinyFish Search
- Send the key in the
X-API-Keyheader. The Search host ishttps://api.search.tinyfish.ai, notagent.tinyfish.ai - Stay under 30 requests a minute per key. On 429, wait for
Retry-After. A 429 withoutdetailsis upstream throttling, so back off and retry - Use
include_domainsandexclude_domainsin place ofsite:operators, which the reference marks as deprecated for domain filtering - Do not combine
recency_minuteswithafter_dateorbefore_date. Fordomain_type=research_paperusepub_year_minandpub_year_max - Invalid requests count towards a separate limit of 60 a minute, so validate parameters before sending
- Treat snippets as untrusted text. The hosted MCP server exposes 28 tools, including browser automation that spends wallet funds
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, SerpKite or TinyFish Search?
SerpKite scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against TinyFish Search's 63.2 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. TinyFish Search leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.
Do SerpKite and TinyFish Search need an API key?
SerpKite needs an API key. TinyFish Search takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call SerpKite and TinyFish Search without installing anything?
Yes. SerpKite has a hosted endpoint at https://api.serpkite.com/v1/search and TinyFish Search at https://api.search.tinyfish.ai.
Other comparisons with SerpKite or TinyFish Search
- Brave Search API + MCP vs SerpKite
- Brave Search API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs SerpKite
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs TinyFish Search
- Exa API + MCP vs SerpKite
- Exa API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpKite
- Firecrawl MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Linkup vs SerpKite
- Linkup vs TinyFish Search
- Parallel Search and Task APIs vs SerpKite
- Parallel Search and Task APIs vs TinyFish Search
- SearchAPI.io vs SerpKite
- SearchAPI.io vs TinyFish Search
- SerpApi vs SerpKite
- SerpApi vs TinyFish Search
- Serper vs SerpKite
- Serper vs TinyFish Search
- SerpKite vs Tavily API + MCP
- SerpKite vs Valyu
- SerpKite vs You.com APIs
- Tavily API + MCP vs TinyFish Search
- TinyFish Search vs Valyu
- TinyFish Search vs You.com APIs
- Fetch (MCP reference server) vs SerpKite
- Fetch (MCP reference server) vs TinyFish Search
- Grep AI vs TinyFish Search
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/serpkite-vs-tinyfish-search.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/serpkite.json·/api/v1/tools/tinyfish-search.json - From a terminal
anchor compare serpkite tinyfish-search(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "serpkite", "b": "tinyfish-search"}at/mcp, no key