Head to head · Fetching pages · October 2026 research run

Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ScrapingAnt's 35.9 (F). Both do fetching pages. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 82 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Firecrawl MCP for

  • reliability (+40)
  • schema & documentation (+45)
  • agent ergonomics (+26)
  • security & auth (+57)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+82)
  • transparency & trust (+19)

Pick ScrapingAnt for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFirecrawl MCPScrapingAntEdge
Reliability16%207030Firecrawl MCP +40
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28843Firecrawl MCP +45
Agent ergonomics13%16.29266Firecrawl MCP +26
Security & auth14%17.56710Firecrawl MCP +57
Payments & pricing10%12.55040Firecrawl MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8875Firecrawl MCP +82
Transparency & trust7%8.87657Firecrawl MCP +19
Negative events≤1500
Total75.5 · BB35.9 · F

Facts side by side

FactFirecrawl MCPScrapingAnt
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorFirecrawl (Mendable)ScrapingAnt (DATAANT)
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcphttps://api.scrapingant.com/v2/general
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITnone
Tools exposed263
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-servernot listed
Last release2026-10-012024-07-16
Popularity7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk90 npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (8)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Firecrawl MCP

Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.

ScrapingAnt

10,000 free credits a month with no card. API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs.

Before you call either

Firecrawl MCP

  1. Use firecrawl_map to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site
  2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a signup_url for the human
  3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
  4. Poll firecrawl_check_crawl_status rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call
  5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit

ScrapingAnt

  1. Send the key in the x-api-key header rather than the query string
  2. Use /v2/markdown for LLM input, and set browser=false on static pages to pay 1 credit instead of 10
  3. Switch to proxy_type=residential only after a 423 (anti-bot) response. It raises a browser request from 10 to 125 credits
  4. On the free plan a second concurrent request gets 409. Wait for the first to finish
  5. Google, Bing and Yandex result pages come back as raw HTML through /v2/general, so you parse them yourself

Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or ScrapingAnt

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.