Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
Olostep has a score of 63.1 (B) against ScrapingAnt's 35.9 (F). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 53 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Olostep for
- reliability (+30)
- schema & documentation (+41)
- agent ergonomics (+21)
- security & auth (+18)
- payments & pricing (+25)
- maintenance & community (+53)
Pick ScrapingAnt for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | ScrapingAnt | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 30 | Olostep +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 43 | Olostep +41 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 66 | Olostep +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 10 | Olostep +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 40 | Olostep +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 5 | Olostep +53 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 57 | Olostep +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 35.9 · F |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | ScrapingAnt |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | ScrapingAnt (DATAANT) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://api.scrapingant.com/v2/general |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | payer tooling only | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 3 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2024-07-16 |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 90 npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Olostep
OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.
ScrapingAnt
10,000 free credits a month with no card. API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs.
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
ScrapingAnt
- Send the key in the
x-api-keyheader rather than the query string - Use
/v2/markdownfor LLM input, and setbrowser=falseon static pages to pay 1 credit instead of 10 - Switch to
proxy_type=residentialonly after a 423 (anti-bot) response. It raises a browser request from 10 to 125 credits - On the free plan a second concurrent request gets 409. Wait for the first to finish
- Google, Bing and Yandex result pages come back as raw HTML through
/v2/general, so you parse them yourself
Other comparisons with Olostep or ScrapingAnt
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingant.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingant.md