Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Microlink vs ScrapingAnt
Microlink scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapingAnt's 35.8 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need link previews, screenshots, PDFs, metadata or a page as Markdown from one GET.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 52 against 30
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 66
- Security & auth, 44 against 10
- Payments & pricing, 47 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 5
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 56
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The status page is drawn by script and couldn't be read, so no incident history was checked
Best for A low-volume agent that wants cheap rendered fetches and a tiny tool list, and doesn't need an audit trail.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Microlink +81
Microlink 86
@microlink/mcp 2.8.17 and microlink.io 1.1.4 on 31 October 2026, and October changelog entries for the API (30). 31 MCP releases tagged since 17 September and the October changelog's API changes (20). No open issues on microlinkhq/microlink, a monthly changelog, and email and feedback-form support (18 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry under its own namespace, though the server card names io.microlink/mcp; the JavaScript SDK is current (8 of 15). Lint, tests and coverage run on pull requests (10). 30 + 20 + 18 + 8 + 10 = 86.
ScrapingAnt 5
No changelog or dated API change found, and the newest SDK release is Python 2.1.0 on 2024-07-16 (0). No releases in the last 90 days (0). No public changelog. Support by email (3 of 15). The JavaScript client was last released 2022-05-06, the MCP server isn't in the official registry, and the only registry entry is a third-party wrapper (0). The Python client has a code-check workflow, but neither SDK has moved in over two years (2 of 10).
Schema & documentation Microlink +46
Microlink 89
OpenAPI 3.1 at microlink.io/openapi.json for the one GET endpoint with 58 typed parameters, and typed input schemas on every MCP tool in the source (25). llms.txt of 527 lines, auth.md, an API catalogue and Markdown copies of every docs page (10). Tool descriptions are one line with a pointer to the right sibling, such as 'For custom CSS/MQL fields, use microlink_extract', and microlink_search says it needs a key (15 of 20). Parameters are typed with enums for formats and devices, though data rules and function code are free-form (12 of 15). Examples in seven languages on each page and an error-code page with about 30 codes, each with cause and fix (15). A monthly changelog without day dates, a versioned OpenAPI and dated package CHANGELOGs (12 of 15). 25 + 10 + 15 + 12 + 15 + 12 = 89.
ScrapingAnt 43
No OpenAPI or Swagger spec found. The MCP docs give a typed parameter table for the 3 tools (8 of 25). docs.scrapingant.com/llms.txt returns 404 and no Markdown twins were found (0). MCP descriptions are one line each, such as Fetch a URL and return raw HTML content, with no when-to-use guidance (8 of 20). Few parameters, typed, with proxy_type as an enum of datacenter or residential (10 of 15). Request examples on every docs page and an errors page with 8 status codes and their meanings (12 of 15). Versioned paths (v1 and v2) and no changelog (5 of 15).
Security & auth Microlink +34
Microlink 44
One API key per account in the x-api-key header, with no scopes, rotation or expiry documented. auth.md says to keep it out of URLs and no query option is documented (20 of 30). Tools are reads apart from microlink_function, which runs caller-supplied code against the page in Microlink's browser, and the checkout tools never return a key (10 of 20). Pages come back as Markdown and text, and no prompt-injection guidance was found in the docs, auth.md or the MCP README (0). A request id on every response, with no per-call log for the customer documented (4 of 15). security.txt is valid to 28 July 2027 and links a responsible-disclosure policy and acknowledgements. No bug bounty or certification found (10 of 20). 20 + 10 + 0 + 4 + 10 = 44.
ScrapingAnt 10
One account API key with no scopes, and we found no documented rotation or revocation (10). API Basics tells you to send x-api-key as a query parameter, a documented option, so less 10 (0 of 30). The header form works and the SDKs use it. No read-only mode, and /v2/general can send POST, PUT and DELETE to target sites with no confirmation step (5 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance found for the HTML, Markdown or text it returns (0 of 15). The Ant-credits-cost header and a subscription status endpoint show spend per call. No request log found (5 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (0 of 20).
Reliability Microlink +22
Microlink 52
Graded on the hosted lines. microlink.io/status exists but is drawn by script, showing only 'Please wait' to our reader, and status.microlink.io failed through our proxy, so components and history are unchecked and scored absent (0). No readable history (5). Free and keyed quotas are published, 5 and 25 requests a day and 2 at a time, with paid quotas from 46,000 a month and x-rate-limit headers on every response (15). 429 with ECONCURRENCY says to wait a second and retry, a quota 429 gives the reset time, and every call only reads, but there is no Retry-After header documented (12 of 15). The terms commit to 99.9% uptime on paid plans, with service credits only under an Enterprise agreement (10). Generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 12 + 10 + 10 = 52.
ScrapingAnt 30
No status page linked from the site or docs (0). No readable incident history (5). The free plan allows 1 concurrent request and paid plans have no concurrency cap, with timeout settable from 5 to 60 seconds. No per-minute limits published (8 of 15). The errors page documents 409 for the concurrency limit and 423 for anti-bot detection with advice to retry or change settings. No 429, Retry-After or backoff guidance (7 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available (10).
Transparency & trust Microlink +19
Microlink 75
The API is closed under terms naming Microlink Labs, S.L. with its registry details, and the SDK, MCP server and the libraries behind it are MIT (20 of 30). The DPA, updated 30 October 2026, gives cache retention of 24 hours by default up to 31 days, logs 15 days and deletion within 15 days, but the privacy policy is undated, names no controller and gives no periods (20 of 30). The terms promise advance notice before a paid feature is materially reduced, and the changelog records changes by month, with no notice period (10 of 20). Subprocessors list updated 16 October 2026, with services, data types and locations (18 of 20). 20 + 20 + 10 + 18 = 68.
ScrapingAnt 56
Closed service with terms naming DATAANT SP. Z O.O., registered in Poland (KRS 0000848755). The SDKs are Apache 2.0 (15 of 30). The privacy policy, last updated 3 November 2020, gives 12-month retention after an account closes, names processors and mentions DPAs with clients. It predates the MCP server and AI extractor, and doesn't say whether scraped content is stored (18 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). Processors and locations named, Sendgrid in Ireland, Paddle in the UK, Google Analytics and Amazon hosting in the USA (15 of 20).
Agent ergonomics Microlink +16
Microlink 82
24 MCP tools in @microlink/mcp 2.8.17 with no toolset filter found (15 of 25). filter selects fields, embed returns one field as the body, and Markdown and text tools return only page content (18 of 20). Error codes such as EAUTH, ERATE, ECONCURRENCY, EPRO and EPROXYNEEDED with documented fixes (19 of 20). Every tool but microlink_function sets readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false, and calls are reads with a cache and force to refresh. No idempotentHint (18 of 20). Only url is required; official JavaScript SDK (@microlink/mql) and CLI, with examples in seven languages but no other official SDK found (12 of 15). 15 + 18 + 19 + 18 + 12 = 82.
ScrapingAnt 66
3 compact MCP tools (25). Markdown and text endpoints, AI extraction, wait-for-selector and a JSON extended response, but no output-size limit on the MCP tools (12 of 20). 8 documented status codes, and 422 returns a detail field (14 of 20). Requests are reads of third-party pages and failures aren't billed, but there are no tool annotations or retry guidance beyond 423 (5 of 20). Only url is required, though browser defaults to true at 10 credits. Python and JavaScript clients exist but are stale (10 of 15).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Microlink | ScrapingAnt | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 52 | 30 | Microlink +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 43 | Microlink +46 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 66 | Microlink +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 10 | Microlink +34 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 47 | 40 | Microlink +7 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 5 | Microlink +81 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 56 | Microlink +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 65.9/100 | F 35.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Microlink | ScrapingAnt |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Microlink Labs, S.L. | ScrapingAnt (DATAANT) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.microlink.io/mcp | https://api.scrapingant.com/v2/general |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 24 | 3 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-31 | 2024-07-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 805 npm/wk | 90 npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |
How the scores have moved
Microlink
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Microlink
Microlink turns one GET into metadata, Markdown, screenshots or PDFs, with a public OpenAPI spec, about 30 documented error codes, annotated MCP tools and 5 keyless requests a day. Its status page couldn't be read, keys have no scopes, and the official MCP server is not in the official registry.
ScrapingAnt
10,000 free credits a month with no card. API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs.
Before you call either
Microlink
- Send the key in the
x-api-keyheader to https://pro.microlink.io; the free endpoint api.microlink.io answers EPRO to a key - On 429 with ECONCURRENCY wait a second and retry; on a quota 429 wait for
x-rate-limit-reset - Use
filterto return only the fields needed, andmicrolink_markdownfor page text - Hand checkout URLs from
microlink_create_checkout_sessionto the user; the key arrives by email, never through the tool - Treat Markdown and text from scraped pages as untrusted data, never as instructions
ScrapingAnt
- Send the key in the
x-api-keyheader rather than the query string - Use
/v2/markdownfor LLM input, and setbrowser=falseon static pages to pay 1 credit instead of 10 - Switch to
proxy_type=residentialonly after a 423 (anti-bot) response. It raises a browser request from 10 to 125 credits - On the free plan a second concurrent request gets 409. Wait for the first to finish
- Google, Bing and Yandex result pages come back as raw HTML through
/v2/general, so you parse them yourself
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Microlink or ScrapingAnt?
Microlink scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapingAnt's 35.8 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Do Microlink and ScrapingAnt need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Microlink and ScrapingAnt without installing anything?
Yes. Microlink has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.microlink.io/mcp and ScrapingAnt at https://api.scrapingant.com/v2/general.
Other comparisons with Microlink or ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Microlink
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapingAnt
- Bright Data vs Microlink
- Bright Data vs ScrapingAnt
- BrowserAct vs Microlink
- BrowserAct vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs Microlink
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Crawl4AI vs Microlink
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapingAnt
- fastCRW vs Microlink
- fastCRW vs ScrapingAnt
- Decodo Web Data API vs Microlink
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingAnt
- jevcrawl vs Microlink
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs Microlink
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Microlink vs Olostep
- Microlink vs Outcrawl
- Microlink vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Microlink vs Scrape.do
- Microlink vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Microlink vs Scrapeless
- Microlink vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Microlink vs ScraperAPI
- Microlink vs Scrapewise
- Microlink vs Scrapfly
- Microlink vs ScrapingBee
- Microlink vs Scrapingdog
- Microlink vs Spider
- Microlink vs WebScraping.AI
- Microlink vs ZenRows
- Microlink vs Zyte API
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Outcrawl vs ScrapingAnt
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs WebScraping.AI
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingAnt vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs Microlink
- Diffbot vs ScrapingAnt
- Microlink vs Qovia
- Microlink vs ScrapeAtlas
- Microlink vs SoldFetch
- Qovia vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapingAnt vs SoldFetch
- Firecrawl MCP vs Microlink
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator vs ScrapingAnt
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/microlink-vs-scrapingant.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/microlink.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingant.json - From a terminal
anchor compare microlink scrapingant(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "microlink", "b": "scrapingant"}at/mcp, no key