Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
Scrape.do has a score of 44 (E) against ScrapingAnt's 35.9 (F). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Scrape.do for
- reliability (+10)
- schema & documentation (+14)
- security & auth (+13)
- maintenance & community (+40)
Pick ScrapingAnt for
- payments & pricing (+5)
- transparency & trust (+8)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrape.do | ScrapingAnt | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 30 | Scrape.do +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 57 | 43 | Scrape.do +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 66 | ScrapingAnt +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 10 | Scrape.do +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | ScrapingAnt +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 5 | Scrape.do +40 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 49 | 57 | ScrapingAnt +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 44 · E | 35.9 · F |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrape.do | ScrapingAnt |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrape.do | ScrapingAnt (DATAANT) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrape.do/ | https://api.scrapingant.com/v2/general |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 3 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2024-07-16 |
| Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 90 npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
ScrapingAnt
10,000 free credits a month with no card. API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs.
Before you call either
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
ScrapingAnt
- Send the key in the
x-api-keyheader rather than the query string - Use
/v2/markdownfor LLM input, and setbrowser=falseon static pages to pay 1 credit instead of 10 - Switch to
proxy_type=residentialonly after a 423 (anti-bot) response. It raises a browser request from 10 to 125 credits - On the free plan a second concurrent request gets 409. Wait for the first to finish
- Google, Bing and Yandex result pages come back as raw HTML through
/v2/general, so you parse them yourself
Other comparisons with Scrape.do or ScrapingAnt
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingant.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingant.md