Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrape.do vs Spider
Spider has a score of 74.3 (BB) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 61 points. Spider accepts x402. Scrape.do doesn't.
Which one, for what
Pick Scrape.do for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Spider for
- reliability (+40)
- schema & documentation (+30)
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- security & auth (+19)
- payments & pricing (+61)
- maintenance & community (+40)
- transparency & trust (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrape.do | Spider | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 80 | Spider +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 57 | 87 | Spider +30 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 70 | Spider +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 42 | Spider +19 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 96 | Spider +61 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 85 | Spider +40 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 49 | 69 | Spider +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 44 · E | 74.3 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrape.do | Spider |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrape.do | Spider (BAGELMEN LLC) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrape.do/ | https://api.spider.cloud |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | yes, from $0.0005/call |
| Licence | none | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 22 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | cloud.spider/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-07-19 |
| Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 2.7k stars, 2.7k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.3/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
Spider
Keyless /scrape and working x402 v2 on every core route, so an agent needs no account. Operated by BAGELMEN LLC with no address, retention periods or DPA in the privacy policy.
Before you call either
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
Spider
- Every content route returns a JSON array, even /scrape. The status field is the page's, not the API call's
- Leave request on smart and set return_format to markdown for LLM input
- Set limit on /crawl. Unset, it caps only at your credit balance
- Use /scrape with
stealth: trueinstead of /unblocker, which is deprecated - Honour Retry-After on 429. Keyless use allows 4 requests a minute
Other comparisons with Scrape.do or Spider
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Spider
- Scrapeless vs Spider
- Scrapfly vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Spider vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Apify MCP Server vs Spider
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json·/api/v1/tools/spider-cloud.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/scrape-do-vs-spider-cloud.md