Head to head · Crawling · October 2026 research run
Apify MCP Server vs Spider
Apify MCP Server has a score of 78.6 (A) against Spider's 74.3 (BB). Both do crawling. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 22 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Apify MCP Server for
- schema & documentation (+5)
- agent ergonomics (+22)
- security & auth (+20)
- maintenance & community (+10)
- transparency & trust (+19)
Pick Spider for
- reliability (+15)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apify MCP Server | Spider | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 80 | Spider +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 92 | 87 | Apify MCP Server +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 70 | Apify MCP Server +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 42 | Apify MCP Server +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 95 | 96 | Spider +1 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 95 | 85 | Apify MCP Server +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 88 | 69 | Apify MCP Server +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 78.6 · A | 74.3 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apify MCP Server | Spider |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Apify | Spider (BAGELMEN LLC) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.apify.com | https://api.spider.cloud |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | yes, from $1/call | yes, from $0.0005/call |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 35 | 22 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | com.apify/apify-mcp-server | cloud.spider/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-07-19 |
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 15k npm/wk | 2.7k stars, 2.7k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.4/5 (8) | 3.3/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Apify MCP Server
x402 on Apify's own domains, a prepaid token from agi.apify.com for any Actor and per-run payment on mcp.apify.com for Pay Per Event Actors. API and Actor runs timed out for about 12 hours on 21 and 22 July 2026.
Spider
Keyless /scrape and working x402 v2 on every core route, so an agent needs no account. Operated by BAGELMEN LLC with no address, retention periods or DPA in the privacy policy.
Before you call either
Apify MCP Server
- Call fetch-actor-details before call-actor to get the input schema and the price
- Use apify--web-fetch for one known URL and apify--rag-web-browser for search and read
- Read results with get-dataset-items and set
fieldsandlimit. The default is 20 rows - Buy an AGI token for anything that isn't a Pay Per Event Actor. Direct
?payment=x402refuses the rest - Ask for
get-actor-run-log, notget-actor-log. The old name is ignored without an error
Spider
- Every content route returns a JSON array, even /scrape. The status field is the page's, not the API call's
- Leave request on smart and set return_format to markdown for LLM input
- Set limit on /crawl. Unset, it caps only at your credit balance
- Use /scrape with
stealth: trueinstead of /unblocker, which is deprecated - Honour Retry-After on 429. Keyless use allows 4 requests a minute
Other comparisons with Apify MCP Server or Spider
- Bright Data vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Olostep vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Spider
- Scrapeless vs Spider
- Scrapfly vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Spider vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapeless
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapfly
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/apify-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/spider-cloud.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/apify-mcp-vs-spider-cloud.md