Head to head · Crawling · October 2026 research run
Apify MCP Server vs jevcrawl
Apify MCP Server scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against jevcrawl's 63.7 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do crawling. Apify MCP Server accepts x402. jevcrawl doesn't.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 204 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Best when the job matches an existing Actor (Google Maps, social profiles, e-commerce, SERP) and the agent can wait seconds to minutes for a run.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 92 against 81
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 80
- Payments & pricing, 95 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 95 against 68
- Transparency & trust, 86 against 45
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
API and Actor runs timed out for about 12 hours on 21 and 22 July 2026
jevcrawl B
Best for An agent that must find one answer several clicks deep on a documentation or help site and wants a few thousand tokens back instead of whole pages.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Apify MCP Server loses 5 points for them
Watch for
First released on 13 October 2026, version 0.2.0 and marked alpha, with one maintainer
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apify MCP Server | jevcrawl | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 68 | jevcrawl +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 92 | 81 | Apify MCP Server +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 80 | Apify MCP Server +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 59 | Apify MCP Server +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 95 | 30 | Apify MCP Server +65 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 95 | 68 | Apify MCP Server +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 86 | 45 | Apify MCP Server +41 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 76.5/100 | B 63.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apify MCP Server | jevcrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | MCP server |
| Vendor | Apify | Rayen Mlayeh |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.apify.com | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | yes, from $1/call | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 35 | 3 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | com.apify/apify-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-09 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-09 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 15k npm/wk | 60 stars, 204 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.4/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Apify MCP Server
x402 on Apify's own domains, a prepaid token from agi.apify.com for any Actor and per-run payment on mcp.apify.com for Pay Per Event Actors. API and Actor runs timed out for about 12 hours on 21 and 22 July 2026.
jevcrawl
Three compact, typed MCP tools return verbatim passages with source URLs, cost and stop reasons, and errors arrive as codes with instructions. The project is three days old and alpha, it depends on TypeSafe's paid Jev API, which is in early access with no free tier found, and it does not block crawls of private or local addresses.
Before you call either
Apify MCP Server
- Call fetch-actor-details before call-actor to get the input schema and the price
- Use apify--web-fetch for one known URL and apify--rag-web-browser for search and read
- Read results with get-dataset-items and set
fieldsandlimit. The default is 20 rows - Buy an AGI token for anything that isn't a Pay Per Event Actor, since direct
?payment=x402refuses the rest. Tokens last 14 days and unused balance isn't refunded - Ask for
get-actor-run-log, notget-actor-log. The old name is ignored without an error
jevcrawl
- Phrase
goalas one specific question and start withmax_pagesbetween 10 and 30 - Check
stats.stopped_becauseandstats.degraded, and readuncertainbefore reporting that something is missing - Use
scrapewithout a goal when you need a whole page, since it makes no paid Jev call and needs no key - Handle
{"error": code, "message": ...}results, for exampleauth_errormeansTYPESAFE_API_KEYis missing or rejected - Pages in
stats.needs_js_urlswere not read. Tell the user rather than guessing their content
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Apify MCP Server or jevcrawl?
Apify MCP Server scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against jevcrawl's 63.7 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Apify MCP Server and jevcrawl need an API key?
Apify MCP Server takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. jevcrawl needs an API key. An agent can also pay Apify MCP Server per call over x402, with no account.
Can an agent call Apify MCP Server and jevcrawl without installing anything?
Apify MCP Server has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.apify.com. jevcrawl runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Are Apify MCP Server and jevcrawl open source?
Yes. Apify MCP Server is open source (MIT). jevcrawl is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Apify MCP Server or jevcrawl
- Apify MCP Server vs Jina Reader
- Apify MCP Server vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrape.do
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapingBee
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapingdog
- Apify MCP Server vs ZenRows
- Apify MCP Server vs Zyte API
- Bright Data vs jevcrawl
- Context.dev vs jevcrawl
- jevcrawl vs Jina Reader
- jevcrawl vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- jevcrawl vs Scrape.do
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingAnt
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingBee
- jevcrawl vs Scrapingdog
- jevcrawl vs ZenRows
- jevcrawl vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
- Apify MCP Server vs Diffbot
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapeless
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapfly
- Apify MCP Server vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs jevcrawl
- jevcrawl vs Olostep
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeGraphAI
- jevcrawl vs Scrapeless
- jevcrawl vs ScraperAPI
- jevcrawl vs Scrapfly
- jevcrawl vs Spider
- Diffbot vs jevcrawl
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/apify-mcp-vs-jevcrawl.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/apify-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/jevcrawl.json - From a terminal
anchor compare apify-mcp jevcrawl(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "apify-mcp", "b": "jevcrawl"}at/mcp, no key