Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run

Crawl4AI vs jevcrawl

jevcrawl scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Crawl4AI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crawl4AI leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do scraping.

Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons

Which one, for what

Crawl4AI E

Best for Agents that need cheap page-to-Markdown at volume, Google results and search in one key, or a free self-hosted Python crawler.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 45 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 83 against 68
  • Transparency & trust, 70 against 51

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, SLA or OpenAPI spec for the cloud API found

jevcrawl B

Best for An agent that must find one answer several clicks deep on a documentation or help site and wants a few thousand tokens back instead of whole pages.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 68 against 35
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 55
  • Agent ergonomics, 80 against 67
  • Security & auth, 59 against 46

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • No incidents deducted, where Crawl4AI loses 10 points for them

Watch for

First released on 13 October 2026, version 0.2.0 and marked alpha, with one maintainer

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Reliability jevcrawl +33

Crawl4AI 35

Graded on the hosted lines, for Crawl4AI Cloud, which the README and llms.txt now lead with and which an agent calls through its MCP server; the library would read on the local lines. No status page is linked, and status.crawl4ai.com fails TLS (0). No incident history readable (5). Per-plan limits are published with numbers in /v1/prices, from 10 requests a minute and 2 at a time on Free to 1,500 and 50 on Scale (15). 429 carries X-RateLimit headers and a message, 503 busy says to resend after a few seconds, and MCP job submissions take an idempotency key, but no Retry-After or backoff guidance (10 of 15). No SLA found in the terms or pricing (0). Prices and the free credit are a soft launch, /serp is beta and /answer experimental, while scrape, extract and search carry no beta label (5 of 10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 5 = 35.

jevcrawl 68

Read as local software, though crawl and map also depend on TypeSafe's hosted Jev API. Installs from PyPI with Python 3.11 or later stated (20). CI runs ruff, mypy strict and the offline tests on Python 3.11 and 3.13, and every CI run on main from 11 to 15 October 2026 passed, per the 15 October check; the workflow is unchanged, and run results couldn't be read on 2 November (25). Eight issues, all opened by the maintainer as a roadmap, two closed, per the 15 October check. No outside bug reports were found then, and the project is three weeks old, so there is little record to read (15). Semver tags with GitHub release notes, no CHANGELOG file, v0.1.0's notes only a commit link, and breaking changes not marked (8). Version 0.2.0, still classified Development Status 3 Alpha (0). 20 + 25 + 15 + 8 + 0 = 68.

Schema & documentation jevcrawl +26

Crawl4AI 55

No OpenAPI or similar contract for the cloud API, and the MCP tool schemas are only in the live tools/list, which needs a key. /v1/prices is machine-readable but covers prices, not calls (0). llms.txt of 304 lines written for agents (10). Each endpoint says what it is for and when to choose another, such as trying without a proxy first, using browser only when auto misses content and /scrape/jobs for slow lists (16 of 20). Parameters are listed with types, defaults, allowed values (format both, md or html; proxy none, isp or residential) and limits, in prose (10 of 15). Curl examples per endpoint and documented error strings per status with whether each is charged (14 of 15). No changelog for the cloud API, only dated notes such as /serp 'added 8 Oct 2026'. The library has a dated CHANGELOG (5 of 15). 0 + 10 + 16 + 10 + 14 + 5 = 55.

jevcrawl 81

Typed JSON Schema inputs on all three tools, generated from the Python signatures, with required parameters marked (25). No llms.txt. The repository ships an agent skill, skills/jevcrawl/SKILL.md, as Markdown for agents (5). Tool descriptions and server instructions say when to use crawl, scrape and map, how to phrase a goal and how to read each stop reason (18). Integer and number types with defaults, but the minimums the code enforces are not in the schema and stopped_because is documented as prose, not an enum (10). A real result in the README, and error codes listed in the skill with what each means (13). Semver releases with notes, and the Jev model version pinned per release (10).

Transparency & trust Crawl4AI +19

Crawl4AI 70

The library is Apache-2.0 and the cloud is closed under terms that name CONTEXT4AI PTE LTD (22 of 30). The privacy policy gives retention periods (account plus 90 days, usage records 13 months, logs 90 days), but none for crawled content, and llms.txt says repeated URLs are served from a shared archive while the security page says fetched pages are used only to answer the request (18 of 30). The legacy cloud API closed on 6 November 2026 with a migration guide but no dated notice found, and the terms promise notice of material changes only 'where reasonable' (8 of 20). Subprocessors named with their locations on the security page, with EU storage of account records (18 of 20). 22 + 18 + 8 + 18 = 66.

jevcrawl 51

Apache-2.0 in LICENSE, pyproject.toml and as detected by GitHub (30). The README says plainly that page text, link labels and URLs go to TypeSafe and that answers are cached locally. TypeSafe's policies agree on no training but give no retention period, and jevcrawl has no privacy statement of its own (15). No deprecation policy. The model version is pinned and changes are in release notes (3). No telemetry or analytics found in the source. Outbound traffic is the target site and api.typesafe.ai, both stated in the README, so there is nothing hidden to opt out of, though no explicit telemetry statement exists (15).

Payments & pricing Crawl4AI +15

Crawl4AI 45

No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-endpoint credit costs, effort multipliers and plan rates are public at /v1/prices without a login, with 1 credit = $0.001 (20). 1,000 free credits a month, no card (20). A 7-day pass key comes from a click on api.crawl4ai.com without an account, which is still a person in a browser, and a permanent key needs email verification (5 of 20). 0 + 20 + 20 + 5 = 45.

jevcrawl 30

No payment protocol (0). The package is free, so read with the rule for the paid option it needs, TypeSafe's Jev. Per-token price published at $0.042 per million input tokens for jev-1.13.0 and jev-1.14.0, re-read on 2 November (20). No free Jev tier found. scrape without a goal works with no key, which is a small free path (5 of 20). A person has to sign in at console.typesafe.ai, and TypeSafe describes Jev as early access. The console answered 403 to our reader. Keyless goal-less scraping earns a little (5 of 20).

Maintenance & community Crawl4AI +15

Crawl4AI 83

Library v0.9.5 on 14 October 2026, 23 days before 6 November, and the cloud added /serp on 8 October (30). v0.9.3 (31 August), v0.9.4 (23 September) and v0.9.5 (14 October) in the 90 days from 8 August (20). 56 open issues on 6 November, the newest triaged with Bug, Needs Triage, In-progress, Root caused or Done labels within days, plus a Discord. Reply authors weren't read (20 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry, and the cloud has no official SDK; the Python library is current on PyPI (8 of 15). The security workflow runs a test suite and a default-posture gate, and releases are built and checked with twine. No general test workflow on push found (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 20 + 8 + 5 = 83.

jevcrawl 68

v0.2.0 on 15 October 2026, 18 days before 2 November (30). Three releases between 13 and 15 October 2026 (20). One later change, the merged audit-fixes pull request of 26 October (redirect scope, per-step time limits, a 50 MB cap on gzip sitemaps), is in no release yet. No outside issues or pull requests were found on 15 October, and GitHub's issue pages couldn't be read on 2 November (8 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry, which returned no server for jevcrawl on 2 November (0). Current dependencies, a uv.lock, CI and PyPI trusted publishing in the workflows (10). 30 + 20 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 68.

Agent ergonomics jevcrawl +13

Crawl4AI 67

16 MCP tools, six of them for billing and support (15 of 25). format md or html, parse opt-in blocks, batch limits and job results paged 500 at a time over HTTP and 50 over MCP (16 of 20). String error codes an agent can branch on (blocked, login-wall, no-answer, busy, no_credit, plan_cap, spend_cap), each with whether it is charged (18 of 20). Failed and cancelled calls aren't charged and jobs_submit takes an idempotency key, but no tool annotations are documented and two tools can charge the saved card (10 of 20). Only url or q is required. There is no official SDK for the cloud API; the docs give curl and standard-library Python and Node examples (8 of 15). 15 + 16 + 18 + 10 + 8 = 67.

jevcrawl 80

Three compact tools (25). max_pages, max_seconds, return_tokens and limit bound every call, and scrape can return a whole page or only the passages for a goal. No pagination is needed (18). Expected failures come back as {error, message} with a message that says what to do, and stopped_because, degraded and needs_js_urls tell the agent why a result is thin (19). All tools read only and repeats are answered from a local cache at no cost, but there are no readOnlyHint or idempotentHint annotations (10). Only goal and start_url are required, with measured defaults. The Python library is usable but undocumented (an open issue), and there is one language (8).

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCrawl4AIjevcrawlEdge
Reliability16%203568jevcrawl +33
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25581jevcrawl +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26780jevcrawl +13
Security & auth14%17.54659jevcrawl +13
Payments & pricing10%12.54530Crawl4AI +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88368Crawl4AI +15
Transparency & trust7%8.87051Crawl4AI +19
Negative events≤15-100
TotalE 43.9/100B 64.3/100

Facts side by side

FactCrawl4AIjevcrawl
KindHTTP APIMCP server
VendorCONTEXT4AI PTE LTDRayen Mlayeh
Hosted endpointhttps://api.crawl4ai.com/mcpno (local only)
TransportsStreamable HTTPstdio
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
Price for scraping$0.50 per 1,000 pagesnot published
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Tools exposed163
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-142026-10-15
Terms last updated2026-10-15no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-15no document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot read yet
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot read yet
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot read yet
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot read yet
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot read yet
Popularity87k stars, 368k PyPI/wk60 stars, 204 PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone3.3/5 (4)

How the scores have moved

Crawl4AI

No score change since it was listed.

jevcrawl

Verdicts

Crawl4AI

Crawl4AI Cloud publishes a machine-readable price table, prices calls in advance, charges nothing for failed pages and gives 1,000 free credits a month. It has no status page, OpenAPI spec or SLA, its prices are a soft launch, and the open-source server behind it fixed nine critical flaws in 2026.

jevcrawl

Three compact, typed MCP tools return verbatim passages with source URLs, cost and stop reasons, and errors arrive as codes with instructions. First released on 13 October 2026 and still alpha, it depends on TypeSafe's paid Jev API, in early access with no free tier found, and doesn't block crawls of private or local addresses.

Before you call either

Crawl4AI

  1. Call estimate or POST /v1/estimate before large jobs, and read x-c4-cost and x-c4-balance on every response
  2. Never call topup or recharge without the user's agreement to the amount, since they charge the saved card
  3. Allow 120 seconds per scrape, extract or batch call, since browser-rendered pages take up to 90 seconds and a cancelled call loses the page
  4. Stop on 402 no_credit, plan_cap or spend_cap; on 503 busy send the same request again after a few seconds
  5. Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data, since the docs give no prompt-injection guidance

jevcrawl

  1. Phrase goal as one specific question and start with max_pages between 10 and 30
  2. Check stats.stopped_because and stats.degraded, and read uncertain before reporting that something is missing
  3. Use scrape without a goal when you need a whole page, since it makes no paid Jev call and needs no key
  4. Handle {"error": code, "message": ...} results, for example auth_error means TYPESAFE_API_KEY is missing or rejected
  5. Pages in stats.needs_js_urls were not read. Tell the user rather than guessing their content

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Crawl4AI or jevcrawl?

jevcrawl scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Crawl4AI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crawl4AI leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Do Crawl4AI and jevcrawl need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Crawl4AI and jevcrawl without installing anything?

Crawl4AI has a hosted endpoint at https://api.crawl4ai.com/mcp. jevcrawl runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.

Are Crawl4AI and jevcrawl open source?

Yes. Crawl4AI is open source (Apache-2.0). jevcrawl is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Crawl4AI or jevcrawl

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.