Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
jevcrawl scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 242 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
jevcrawl B
Best for An agent that must find one answer several clicks deep on a documentation or help site and wants a few thousand tokens back instead of whole pages.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 42
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
First released on 13 October 2026, version 0.2.0 and marked alpha, with one maintainer
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 81
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 61 against 51
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | jevcrawl | ScrapeAtlas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 42 | jevcrawl +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 88 | ScrapeAtlas +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 76 | jevcrawl +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 59 | 55 | jevcrawl +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 68 | 70 | ScrapeAtlas +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 61 | ScrapeAtlas +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.3/100 | B 63/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | jevcrawl | ScrapeAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Rayen Mlayeh | OD. Media & Technology LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.scrapeatlas.com |
| Transports | stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 373 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 60 stars, 204 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
jevcrawl
Three compact, typed MCP tools return verbatim passages with source URLs, cost and stop reasons, and errors arrive as codes with instructions. The project is three days old and alpha, it depends on TypeSafe's paid Jev API, which is in early access with no free tier found, and it does not block crawls of private or local addresses.
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is five weeks old.
Before you call either
jevcrawl
- Phrase
goalas one specific question and start withmax_pagesbetween 10 and 30 - Check
stats.stopped_becauseandstats.degraded, and readuncertainbefore reporting that something is missing - Use
scrapewithout a goal when you need a whole page, since it makes no paid Jev call and needs no key - Handle
{"error": code, "message": ...}results, for exampleauth_errormeansTYPESAFE_API_KEYis missing or rejected - Pages in
stats.needs_js_urlswere not read. Tell the user rather than guessing their content
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, jevcrawl or ScrapeAtlas?
jevcrawl scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Do jevcrawl and ScrapeAtlas need an API key?
jevcrawl needs an API key. ScrapeAtlas takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call jevcrawl and ScrapeAtlas without installing anything?
jevcrawl runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. ScrapeAtlas has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrapeatlas.com.
Are jevcrawl and ScrapeAtlas open source?
jevcrawl is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for ScrapeAtlas.
Other comparisons with jevcrawl or ScrapeAtlas
- Bright Data vs jevcrawl
- Context.dev vs jevcrawl
- jevcrawl vs Jina Reader
- jevcrawl vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- jevcrawl vs Scrape.do
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingAnt
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingBee
- jevcrawl vs Scrapingdog
- jevcrawl vs ZenRows
- jevcrawl vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs jevcrawl
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs jevcrawl
- Firecrawl MCP vs jevcrawl
- jevcrawl vs Olostep
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeGraphAI
- jevcrawl vs Scrapeless
- jevcrawl vs ScraperAPI
- jevcrawl vs Scrapewise
- jevcrawl vs Scrapfly
- jevcrawl vs Spider
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/jevcrawl-vs-scrapeatlas.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/jevcrawl.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json - From a terminal
anchor compare jevcrawl scrapeatlas(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "jevcrawl", "b": "scrapeatlas"}at/mcp, no key