jevcrawl vs ScrapingAnt

jevcrawl

Three compact, typed MCP tools return verbatim passages with source URLs, cost and stop reasons, and errors arrive as codes with instructions. The project is three days old and alpha, it depends on TypeSafe's paid Jev API, which is in early access with no free tier found, and it does not block crawls of private or local addresses.

ScrapingAnt

10,000 free credits a month with no card. API Basics puts the key in the query string, so it lands in logs.

jevcrawl

1. Phrase goal as one specific question and start with max_pages between 10 and 30
2. Check stats.stopped_because and stats.degraded, and read uncertain before reporting that something is missing
3. Use scrape without a goal when you need a whole page, since it makes no paid Jev call and needs no key
4. Handle {"error": code, "message": ...} results, for example auth_error means TYPESAFE_API_KEY is missing or rejected
5. Pages in stats.needs_js_urls were not read. Tell the user rather than guessing their content

ScrapingAnt

1. Send the key in the x-api-key header rather than the query string
2. Use /v2/markdown for LLM input, and set browser=false on static pages to pay 1 credit instead of 10
3. Switch to proxy_type=residential only after a 423 (anti-bot) response. It raises a browser request from 10 to 125 credits
4. On the free plan a second concurrent request gets 409. Wait for the first to finish
5. Google, Bing and Yandex result pages come back as raw HTML through /v2/general, so you parse them yourself