Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Crawl4AI vs ScrapeAtlas
ScrapeAtlas scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against Crawl4AI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Crawl4AI leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Crawl4AI E
Best for Agents that need cheap page-to-Markdown at volume, Google results and search in one key, or a free self-hosted Python crawler.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 59
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No status page, SLA or OpenAPI spec for the cloud API found
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 42 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 67
- Security & auth, 55 against 46
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 45
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Crawl4AI loses 10 points for them
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Schema & documentation ScrapeAtlas +33
Crawl4AI 55
No OpenAPI or similar contract for the cloud API, and the MCP tool schemas are only in the live tools/list, which needs a key. /v1/prices is machine-readable but covers prices, not calls (0). llms.txt of 304 lines written for agents (10). Each endpoint says what it is for and when to choose another, such as trying without a proxy first, using browser only when auto misses content and /scrape/jobs for slow lists (16 of 20). Parameters are listed with types, defaults, allowed values (format both, md or html; proxy none, isp or residential) and limits, in prose (10 of 15). Curl examples per endpoint and documented error strings per status with whether each is charged (14 of 15). No changelog for the cloud API, only dated notes such as /serp 'added 8 Oct 2026'. The library has a dated CHANGELOG (5 of 15). 0 + 10 + 16 + 10 + 14 + 5 = 55.
ScrapeAtlas 88
An OpenAPI 3.1.0 file (version 0.1.0, 34 MB) is public at scrapeatlas.com/docs/openapi.json with 384 paths and 386 operations, a per-platform x-api-key security scheme on each, response schemas for 200 and every documented error, and 931 component schemas (25). llms.txt at scrapeatlas.com/docs/llms.txt lists all 373 endpoints with one-line descriptions and schema links, and endpoint pages carry a copy-as-Markdown action (10). 386 operations have a summary and 373 a description, median 39 words, saying what public page is read, what the response holds, how to page and what it costs. llms.txt says not to assume one normalised JSON shape. Guidance on when not to call an endpoint is thin, with 9 descriptions using only and 2 instead (14 of 20). 1,390 parameters, 304 with enums, most with minLength, maxLength or a pattern, 232 operations needing one required parameter and 143 none; the 12 POST bodies are typed (14 of 15). A response example on 373 operations and examples on 508 parameters, HTTP 400 to 504 mapped to one failure object with 33 codes, per-endpoint error tables and code samples in six languages; no Retry-After header declared (14 of 15). Paths are under /v1 and a dated public changelog started on 24 September 2026 with 58 updates, but nothing is marked deprecated in the file, breaking changes aren't flagged, and the 14 October GitHub entry says former paths keep working without saying for how long (11 of 15). 25+10+14+14+14+11 = 88.
Maintenance & community Crawl4AI +13
Crawl4AI 83
Library v0.9.5 on 14 October 2026, 23 days before 6 November, and the cloud added /serp on 8 October (30). v0.9.3 (31 August), v0.9.4 (23 September) and v0.9.5 (14 October) in the 90 days from 8 August (20). 56 open issues on 6 November, the newest triaged with Bug, Needs Triage, In-progress, Root caused or Done labels within days, plus a Discord. Reply authors weren't read (20 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry, and the cloud has no official SDK; the Python library is current on PyPI (8 of 15). The security workflow runs a test suite and a default-posture gate, and releases are built and checked with twine. No general test workflow on push found (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 20 + 8 + 5 = 83.
ScrapeAtlas 70
The newest change is CLI 0.26.0 on 28 October 2026 per the 30 October npm reading, not re-read on 2 November, after the StockX endpoints on 27 October, still the changelog's newest entry on 2 November (30). 15 dated release days between 21 September and 27 October, 58 updates (20). Closed service with a public changelog. Support in the dashboard is for customers with a credit purchase, the contact form takes buying questions and privacy requests, and no Discord, forum or issue tracker was found; the careers page lists a customer support role (7 of 15). io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas is in the official MCP registry under a GitHub-verified personal namespace, at 1.0.0 since 5 October and describing about 40 platforms against 49 now. The CLI is current on npm and an n8n node exists, but there are no SDKs (10 of 15). The CLI package has no repository field, no public source and no visible CI; it needs Node 22 or newer (3 of 10). 30+20+7+10+3 = 70.
Transparency & trust Crawl4AI +11
Crawl4AI 70
The library is Apache-2.0 and the cloud is closed under terms that name CONTEXT4AI PTE LTD (22 of 30). The privacy policy gives retention periods (account plus 90 days, usage records 13 months, logs 90 days), but none for crawled content, and llms.txt says repeated URLs are served from a shared archive while the security page says fetched pages are used only to answer the request (18 of 30). The legacy cloud API closed on 6 November 2026 with a migration guide but no dated notice found, and the terms promise notice of material changes only 'where reasonable' (8 of 20). Subprocessors named with their locations on the security page, with EU storage of account records (18 of 20). 22 + 18 + 8 + 18 = 66.
ScrapeAtlas 59
Closed service with clear terms dated 29 September 2026 naming the legal entity, governing law and liability cap; the CLI is MIT on npm with no source published (15 of 30). The privacy policy (19 October 2026) gives retention periods, 90 days for raw usage records, 30 days for inactive key metadata, 10 minutes to 30 days for OAuth artefacts, and says workers keep no archive of results, which the terms and the Public Data Notice repeat. Providers are named with their roles. No DPA is published; the terms say to arrange one before submitting such a workload (22 of 30). The terms promise reasonable notice of material changes when practicable, and the changelog records a Reddit retirement on 29 September and kept paths on 14 October, but there is no deprecation policy with periods and nothing in the OpenAPI file is marked deprecated (7 of 20). Supabase, Tinybird, PostHog, Stripe, Google, OpenAI and Affonso are named with purposes, but the only location statement is that the operator is in the UAE and infrastructure can process in other countries (10 of 20). 15+22+7+10 = 54.
Payments & pricing ScrapeAtlas +10
Crawl4AI 45
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-endpoint credit costs, effort multipliers and plan rates are public at /v1/prices without a login, with 1 credit = $0.001 (20). 1,000 free credits a month, no card (20). A 7-day pass key comes from a click on api.crawl4ai.com without an account, which is still a person in a browser, and a permanent key needs email verification (5 of 20). 0 + 20 + 20 + 5 = 45.
ScrapeAtlas 55
No x402, MPP or L402 on ScrapeAtlas's own endpoints. The vendor's eight Actors on the Apify Store, covering TikTok, Instagram, Meetup and Couchsurfing at $1.98 per 1,000 successful requests, can be paid through Apify, whose prepaid token is sold over x402, so partial credit for a third-party route on part of the catalogue (10 of 40). Per-unit prices are on the home page without a login, 1 credit per successful request and packs at $1.90, $1.78 and $1.25 per 1,000, with the 2-credit endpoints named (20). 100 free credits at signup, no card (20). A person signs up in a browser and creates a key; the Apify route reaches four platforms without a ScrapeAtlas account (5 of 20). 10+20+20+5 = 55.
Agent ergonomics ScrapeAtlas +9
Crawl4AI 67
16 MCP tools, six of them for billing and support (15 of 25). format md or html, parse opt-in blocks, batch limits and job results paged 500 at a time over HTTP and 50 over MCP (16 of 20). String error codes an agent can branch on (blocked, login-wall, no-answer, busy, no_credit, plan_cap, spend_cap), each with whether it is charged (18 of 20). Failed and cancelled calls aren't charged and jobs_submit takes an idempotency key, but no tool annotations are documented and two tools can charge the saved card (10 of 20). Only url or q is required. There is no official SDK for the cloud API; the docs give curl and standard-library Python and Node examples (8 of 15). 15 + 16 + 18 + 10 + 8 = 67.
ScrapeAtlas 76
API reading. Responses are bounded by limit on 93 operations, by per-body caps, by format on 19 and view on 14 operations, and by since and until on about 60; Instagram and Twitch have reduced basic-profile endpoints. No field selection was found. The MCP server loads 373 tool definitions with no documented subset, which on the MCP reading would score 5 (15 of 25). Cursor pagination on 130 operations, sort on 28, date windows, and coverage.order reported on every list since 2 October 2026 (20). One failure object with code and message, a requestId on every response, retryable codes named, and an HTTP status table (19 of 20). All data reads are GET, failed requests aren't charged, and the docs say which codes to retry; no idempotency key on the 12 POST batch reads and MCP annotations weren't read (14 of 20). Median one required parameter and defaults on limits, but no official SDK in any language. The npm CLI, the n8n node and six-language samples stand in (8 of 15). 15+20+19+14+8 = 76.
Security & auth ScrapeAtlas +9
Crawl4AI 46
Bearer keys, shown once and regenerable, with 3 to 30 keys per plan. claude.ai and ChatGPT sign in through a flow that advertises one scope, mcp, and each app shows as a revocable key. No per-key scopes, and the docs don't offer the key in a URL (22 of 30). A key can call billing routes, and the MCP topup and recharge tools charge the saved card, though llms.txt tells agents to ask first and accounts can set a spend cap. No read-only key (6 of 20). Scraped pages are untrusted text and no prompt-injection guidance was found in llms.txt or the API docs (0). Per-call cost, balance and fetch path in response headers and fields, no access log documented (6 of 15). The security page (4 October 2026) gives a disclosure process with fix targets and says SOC 2 is in progress, and the library publishes GitHub advisories with reporter credits. security.txt redirects to a 404, and no bounty found (12 of 20). 22 + 6 + 0 + 6 + 12 = 46.
ScrapeAtlas 55
Customer keys with prefix sa_live_, several per account, each with an expiry date, revoked within 60 seconds and stored as hashes per the privacy policy, and keys can't start a checkout or create keys. No scopes or per-platform keys. The MCP server adds an authorization-code flow with PKCE S256, dynamic client registration, refresh-token rotation and revocation, but a single scope, scrapeatlas. No documented option to send a secret in a query string, and the MCP page says never to put the key in a prompt, argument or URL (22 of 30). The whole surface is read-only retrieval of public pages with no destructive action, and an OAuth grant covers retrieval plus the account's usage records only; nothing restricts a key to some platforms (16 of 20). Every response is third-party page content, and the only guidance found concerns keeping secrets out of tool arguments, nothing on treating returned text as untrusted (2 of 15). GET /v1/activity returns per-request metadata (endpoint, time, status, duration) newest first with filters, GET /v1/usage daily totals, responses carry x-credits-charged and x-credits-remaining, and the dashboard shows a credit history (13 of 15). No security.txt (404), no disclosure policy, bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the privacy policy describes access controls and incident notices and gives an abuse address (2 of 20). 22+16+2+13+2 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crawl4AI | ScrapeAtlas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 42 | ScrapeAtlas +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 55 | 88 | ScrapeAtlas +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 76 | ScrapeAtlas +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 45 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 70 | Crawl4AI +13 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 59 | Crawl4AI +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -10 | 0 | |
| Total | E 43.9/100 | B 62.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crawl4AI | ScrapeAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | CONTEXT4AI PTE LTD | OD. Media & Technology LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.crawl4ai.com/mcp | https://api.scrapeatlas.com |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository |
| Tools exposed | 16 | 373 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 87k stars, 368k PyPI/wk | none |
How the scores have moved
Crawl4AI
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Crawl4AI
Crawl4AI Cloud publishes a machine-readable price table, prices calls in advance, charges nothing for failed pages and gives 1,000 free credits a month. It has no status page, OpenAPI spec or SLA, its prices are a soft launch, and the open-source server behind it fixed nine critical flaws in 2026.
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is six weeks old.
Before you call either
Crawl4AI
- Call
estimateor POST /v1/estimate before large jobs, and readx-c4-costandx-c4-balanceon every response - Never call
topuporrechargewithout the user's agreement to the amount, since they charge the saved card - Allow 120 seconds per scrape, extract or batch call, since browser-rendered pages take up to 90 seconds and a cancelled call loses the page
- Stop on 402 no_credit, plan_cap or spend_cap; on 503 busy send the same request again after a few seconds
- Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data, since the docs give no prompt-injection guidance
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crawl4AI or ScrapeAtlas?
ScrapeAtlas scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against Crawl4AI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Crawl4AI leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Do Crawl4AI and ScrapeAtlas need an API key?
Crawl4AI needs an API key. ScrapeAtlas takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Crawl4AI and ScrapeAtlas without installing anything?
Yes. Crawl4AI has a hosted endpoint at https://api.crawl4ai.com/mcp and ScrapeAtlas at https://api.scrapeatlas.com.
Are Crawl4AI and ScrapeAtlas open source?
Crawl4AI is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for ScrapeAtlas.
Other comparisons with Crawl4AI or ScrapeAtlas
- Bright Data vs Crawl4AI
- BrowserAct vs Crawl4AI
- Context.dev vs Crawl4AI
- Crawl4AI vs fastCRW
- Crawl4AI vs Decodo Web Data API
- Crawl4AI vs Diffbot
- Crawl4AI vs jevcrawl
- Crawl4AI vs Jina Reader
- Crawl4AI vs Microlink
- Crawl4AI vs Olostep
- Crawl4AI vs Outcrawl
- Crawl4AI vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Crawl4AI vs Scrape.do
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapeless
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Crawl4AI vs ScraperAPI
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapewise
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapfly
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapingAnt
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapingBee
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapingdog
- Crawl4AI vs Spider
- Crawl4AI vs WebScraping.AI
- Crawl4AI vs ZenRows
- Crawl4AI vs Zyte API
- Crawl4AI vs Firecrawl MCP
- BrowserAct vs ScrapeAtlas
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Crawl4AI vs Qovia
- Crawl4AI vs SoldFetch
- fastCRW vs ScrapeAtlas
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Microlink vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Outcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Qovia vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs WebScraping.AI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs Crawl4AI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crawl4ai-vs-scrapeatlas.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crawl4ai.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crawl4ai scrapeatlas(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crawl4ai", "b": "scrapeatlas"}at/mcp, no key