Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
fastCRW vs ScrapeAtlas
fastCRW scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 62.8 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
fastCRW B
Best for Agents that want Firecrawl-style scrape, crawl, map, search and extract at lower per-page cost, or a small self-hosted engine.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 50 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 91 against 76
- Maintenance & community, 93 against 70
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
The status page shows a live check and an uptime objective but no incident history
Best for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 55 against 40
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 35
Watch for
No status page or incident history was found, and the terms promise no uptime, throughput or continued availability of an endpoint
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community fastCRW +23
fastCRW 93
v0.41.0 on 4 November 2026, matching the registry and npm (30). 16 dated releases in the 90 days from 8 August, from 0.37.0 to 0.41.0 (20). Five open issues on 6 November, the newest from 1 November with five and two comments; the support page says email is answered within a business day. Reply authors weren't read (18 of 25). In the official MCP registry as io.github.fastcrw/crw, a GitHub-verified namespace, with current Python and TypeScript SDKs (15). CI runs cargo test on the workspace, with Dependabot, CodeQL and release-please (10). 30 + 20 + 18 + 15 + 10 = 93.
ScrapeAtlas 70
The newest change is CLI 0.26.0 on 28 October 2026 per the 30 October npm reading, not re-read on 2 November, after the StockX endpoints on 27 October, still the changelog's newest entry on 2 November (30). 15 dated release days between 21 September and 27 October, 58 updates (20). Closed service with a public changelog. Support in the dashboard is for customers with a credit purchase, the contact form takes buying questions and privacy requests, and no Discord, forum or issue tracker was found; the careers page lists a customer support role (7 of 15). io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas is in the official MCP registry under a GitHub-verified personal namespace, at 1.0.0 since 5 October and describing about 40 platforms against 49 now. The CLI is current on npm and an n8n node exists, but there are no SDKs (10 of 15). The CLI package has no repository field, no public source and no visible CI; it needs Node 22 or newer (3 of 10). 30+20+7+10+3 = 70.
Payments & pricing ScrapeAtlas +20
fastCRW 35
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plans are public with credit costs per operation and top-up prices per block of credits, $9 per 1,000 on Hobby down to $299 per 500,000 on Scale, but top-ups need a plan, so between plan-only and per-unit (15 of 20). 500 one-off credits with no card, plus up to 500 from onboarding tasks (20). Hosted keys need a person to sign up in a browser; the free self-hosted engine runs with no account but isn't the graded surface (0). 0 + 15 + 20 + 0 = 35.
ScrapeAtlas 55
No x402, MPP or L402 on ScrapeAtlas's own endpoints. The vendor's eight Actors on the Apify Store, covering TikTok, Instagram, Meetup and Couchsurfing at $1.98 per 1,000 successful requests, can be paid through Apify, whose prepaid token is sold over x402, so partial credit for a third-party route on part of the catalogue (10 of 40). Per-unit prices are on the home page without a login, 1 credit per successful request and packs at $1.90, $1.78 and $1.25 per 1,000, with the 2-credit endpoints named (20). 100 free credits at signup, no card (20). A person signs up in a browser and creates a key; the Apify route reaches four platforms without a ScrapeAtlas account (5 of 20). 10+20+20+5 = 55.
Agent ergonomics fastCRW +15
fastCRW 91
11 compact MCP tools, two of them the data-source tools added in 0.41.0. Content is capped near 15,000 characters with truncated: true and a resume offset, and map returns at most 100 URLs by default (20 of 25). Formats, main-content filtering, include and exclude selectors, maxLength, startIndex, limit and crawl depth and page caps (20). Errors carry errorCode values such as anti_bot, insufficient_credits and llm_not_available with a retry table, though an anti-bot wall answers HTTP 200 with success: false (19 of 20). Every tool sets readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint, cancel is idempotent and failed pages are refunded, but job starts take no idempotency key (17 of 20). Only url is required, with official Python and TypeScript SDKs (15). 20 + 20 + 19 + 17 + 15 = 91.
ScrapeAtlas 76
API reading. Responses are bounded by limit on 93 operations, by per-body caps, by format on 19 and view on 14 operations, and by since and until on about 60; Instagram and Twitch have reduced basic-profile endpoints. No field selection was found. The MCP server loads 373 tool definitions with no documented subset, which on the MCP reading would score 5 (15 of 25). Cursor pagination on 130 operations, sort on 28, date windows, and coverage.order reported on every list since 2 October 2026 (20). One failure object with code and message, a requestId on every response, retryable codes named, and an HTTP status table (19 of 20). All data reads are GET, failed requests aren't charged, and the docs say which codes to retry; no idempotency key on the 12 POST batch reads and MCP annotations weren't read (14 of 20). Median one required parameter and defaults on limits, but no official SDK in any language. The npm CLI, the n8n node and six-language samples stand in (8 of 15). 15+20+19+14+8 = 76.
Security & auth ScrapeAtlas +15
fastCRW 40
The hosted MCP server publishes RFC 9728 metadata naming its own authorisation server, with PKCE S256, dynamic client registration and one scope, mcp:tools, and the API takes revocable Bearer keys from the dashboard. No key scopes or second scope found (22). The authentication page documents fastcrw.com/mcp/<API_KEY> as a way in, a key in the URL path, so less 10 (12 of 30). Tools mostly read, and data-source calls check approvals, but there is no read-only key or confirmation step for monitors (8 of 20). Managed LLM extraction, summaries and answers wrap scraped text in a nonce fence (crates/crw-extract/src/untrusted.rs), and the hardening guide treats pages as untrusted, but the MCP docs give agents no guidance on scraped content (7 of 15). Each response reports creditsUsed; no per-call log in the docs (5 of 15). SECURITY.md names security@fastcrw.com and GitHub private reporting with a 48-hour acknowledgement, and CI runs CodeQL and OpenSSF Scorecard. security.txt answers 404, and no bounty or certification found (8 of 20). 12 + 8 + 7 + 5 + 8 = 40.
ScrapeAtlas 55
Customer keys with prefix sa_live_, several per account, each with an expiry date, revoked within 60 seconds and stored as hashes per the privacy policy, and keys can't start a checkout or create keys. No scopes or per-platform keys. The MCP server adds an authorization-code flow with PKCE S256, dynamic client registration, refresh-token rotation and revocation, but a single scope, scrapeatlas. No documented option to send a secret in a query string, and the MCP page says never to put the key in a prompt, argument or URL (22 of 30). The whole surface is read-only retrieval of public pages with no destructive action, and an OAuth grant covers retrieval plus the account's usage records only; nothing restricts a key to some platforms (16 of 20). Every response is third-party page content, and the only guidance found concerns keeping secrets out of tool arguments, nothing on treating returned text as untrusted (2 of 15). GET /v1/activity returns per-request metadata (endpoint, time, status, duration) newest first with filters, GET /v1/usage daily totals, responses carry x-credits-charged and x-credits-remaining, and the dashboard shows a credit history (13 of 15). No security.txt (404), no disclosure policy, bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the privacy policy describes access controls and incident notices and gives an abuse address (2 of 20). 22+16+2+13+2 = 55.
Reliability fastCRW +8
fastCRW 50
Graded on the hosted lines, for the hosted API and MCP server an agent would call; the self-hosted engine would read higher on the local lines. fastcrw.com/status is a first-party page with a live health check and a 99.9% monthly uptime objective, but no components with history (10 of 20). It lists no incidents and keeps no history we could read (5). Concurrency per plan is published, 3 on Free to 150 on Scale, while the request-rate guard above it is deliberately unpublished (12 of 15). The rate-limits page documents Retry-After and X-RateLimit headers, gives exponential backoff code, and separates 429 (retry) from 402 (stop). No idempotency keys for crawl, extract or monitor starts (13 of 15). Pricing mentions an SLA only as 'Premier + SLA' on Enterprise, with no terms, and the terms promise no uptime (0). The hosted service is sold on paid plans with no beta label, though the engine is at 0.41.0 (10). 10 + 5 + 12 + 13 + 0 + 10 = 50.
ScrapeAtlas 42
Hosted reading, for the REST API with the MCP server described. No public status page was found. https://scrapeatlas.com/status/ answers 404 and neither the docs nor the footer links one (0). No readable incident history, so 5 by the rubric (5). Limits are published with numbers on the authentication page, 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent requests per account, with per-worker deadlines and byte caps on the platform pages (15). A 429 is documented for account and upstream limits with a retry-after to respect, 503 busy for full capacity, and the responses page says to retry only on upstream_rate_limited, timeout or busy. No Retry-After header is declared in the OpenAPI file and the CLI does no automatic retries. Writes don't exist, the 12 POST operations are batch reads, so idempotency keys aren't needed (12 of 15). No SLA. The terms (29 September 2026) say no particular uptime, throughput or continued availability is promised unless a separate signed agreement says otherwise (0). The API is sold and listed as available on every platform page, with 15 of 386 operations saying preview in their descriptions; the MCP server is labelled Preview and scored under the API (10). 0+5+15+12+0+10 = 42.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | fastCRW | ScrapeAtlas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 42 | fastCRW +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 88 | fastCRW +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 91 | 76 | fastCRW +15 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 55 | ScrapeAtlas +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 93 | 70 | fastCRW +23 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 59 | fastCRW +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.3/100 | B 62.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | fastCRW | ScrapeAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Nanofy OÜ | OD. Media & Technology LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://fastcrw.com/mcp | https://api.scrapeatlas.com |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 373 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.fastcrw/crw | io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-04-04 | 2026-09-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-10-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 881 npm/wk | none |
How the scores have moved
fastCRW
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
fastCRW
Agents get 11 compact, annotated MCP tools with bounded output, a public OpenAPI spec, refunds on failed pages and a free self-hosted engine. The hosted service has no status history, publishes no SLA terms, names its operator only on the support page, and documents an MCP address with the API key in the URL path.
ScrapeAtlas
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 386 operations, typed parameters and a uniform failure object, published limits of 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent, and 1 credit per successful request with failed calls free. No status page, security.txt or SDKs, the MCP server is a preview with 373 tools, and the product is six weeks old.
Before you call either
fastCRW
- Connect to https://fastcrw.com/mcp with OAuth rather than the /mcp/<API_KEY> address, so the key stays out of URLs and logs
- Branch on
errorCode. Stop on 402 insufficient_credits or llm_not_available, and on 429 wait for Retry-After before retrying - Check
successas well as the HTTP status, since an anti-bot wall answers 200 withsuccess: falseanderrorCode: anti_bot - Pass
startIndexfrom a truncated result to read the rest of a long page instead of settingmaxLength: 0 - Use native /v1 routes for new work; /firecrawl/v2 is for Firecrawl SDK migrations and keeps the older 429 for empty balances
ScrapeAtlas
- Send the key as
x-api-keyon https://api.scrapeatlas.com and checkstatuson every HTTP 200;partialis usable data withcoverage.warnings,failedandchallengedcarryfailure.code. - Retry only on
upstream_rate_limited,timeoutandbusy, after theretry-afteron a 429. Stay under 120 requests a minute and 4 concurrent per account. - Pass the returned
cursorback unchanged for the next page, and usesinceanduntil(ISO 8601 or Unix seconds) where listed; each page costs another credit. - Each platform has its own response schema, so read the endpoint's response fields before mapping; unknown values are
null, never 0. - For MCP, connect to https://api.scrapeatlas.com/mcp over Streamable HTTP with
Authorization: Bearerand expect 373 tools; the two account tools and failed calls cost 0 credits.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, fastCRW or ScrapeAtlas?
fastCRW scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 62.8 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.
Do fastCRW and ScrapeAtlas need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call fastCRW and ScrapeAtlas without installing anything?
Yes. fastCRW has a hosted endpoint at https://fastcrw.com/mcp and ScrapeAtlas at https://api.scrapeatlas.com.
Are fastCRW and ScrapeAtlas open source?
fastCRW is open source (AGPL-3.0). No open-source release is listed for ScrapeAtlas.
Other comparisons with fastCRW or ScrapeAtlas
- Bright Data vs fastCRW
- BrowserAct vs fastCRW
- Context.dev vs fastCRW
- Crawl4AI vs fastCRW
- fastCRW vs Decodo Web Data API
- fastCRW vs Diffbot
- fastCRW vs jevcrawl
- fastCRW vs Jina Reader
- fastCRW vs Microlink
- fastCRW vs Olostep
- fastCRW vs Outcrawl
- fastCRW vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- fastCRW vs Scrape.do
- fastCRW vs ScrapeGraphAI
- fastCRW vs Scrapeless
- fastCRW vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- fastCRW vs ScraperAPI
- fastCRW vs Scrapewise
- fastCRW vs Scrapfly
- fastCRW vs ScrapingAnt
- fastCRW vs ScrapingBee
- fastCRW vs Scrapingdog
- fastCRW vs Spider
- fastCRW vs WebScraping.AI
- fastCRW vs ZenRows
- fastCRW vs Zyte API
- fastCRW vs Firecrawl MCP
- BrowserAct vs ScrapeAtlas
- Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas
- Crawl4AI vs ScrapeAtlas
- fastCRW vs Qovia
- fastCRW vs SoldFetch
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs ScrapeAtlas
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeAtlas
- jevcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Microlink vs ScrapeAtlas
- Olostep vs ScrapeAtlas
- Outcrawl vs ScrapeAtlas
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Qovia vs ScrapeAtlas
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeAtlas vs Spider
- ScrapeAtlas vs WebScraping.AI
- ScrapeAtlas vs ZenRows
- ScrapeAtlas vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs fastCRW
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crw-vs-scrapeatlas.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crw.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapeatlas.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crw scrapeatlas(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crw", "b": "scrapeatlas"}at/mcp, no key