Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points.
Jina ReaderJina AI (Elastic) · HTTP API
E45.3/100#402 of 452
Scrape.doScrape.do · HTTP API
E44/100#406 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Jina Reader for
- reliability (+20)
- agent ergonomics (+14)
- security & auth (+9)
- maintenance & community (+20)
- transparency & trust (+12)
Pick Scrape.do for
- schema & documentation (+14)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Jina Reader | Scrape.do | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 40 | Jina Reader +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 43 | 57 | Scrape.do +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 62 | Jina Reader +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 32 | 23 | Jina Reader +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 45 | Jina Reader +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 49 | Jina Reader +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | 0 | |
| Total | 45.3 · E | 44 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Jina Reader | Scrape.do |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Jina AI (Elastic) | Scrape.do |
| Hosted endpoint | https://r.jina.ai/ | https://api.scrape.do/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 12k stars | 2 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Jina Reader
One URL prefix, no key needed, Markdown back. No price per token in any currency on the public page.
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
Before you call either
Jina Reader
- Prefix the URL,
https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com, and read the Markdown - Send
x-max-tokensto cap a page, orx-token-budgetto refuse one that's too big - Use
x-target-selectorwhen you need one part of a page - Keyless is 20 requests a minute and can't search. Add a key for loops or s.jina.ai
- Send
x-no-cache: truewhen a page may have changed or a blocked response got cached
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
Other comparisons with Jina Reader or Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapeless
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/jina-reader.json·/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.md