# Jina Reader vs Scrape.do (slim)

> Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points.

- Jina Reader: E 45.3, rank #402 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jina-reader.min.md
- Scrape.do: E 44, rank #406 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrape-do.min.md
- Pick Jina Reader for reliability (+20), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+9), maintenance & community (+20), transparency & trust (+12). Pick Scrape.do for schema & documentation (+14).

| Category | Jina Reader | Scrape.do |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 43 | 57 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 62 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 32 | 23 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 49 |