Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
ScraperAPI scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 167 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Cheap bulk fetching through rotating proxies when you call HTTP directly and keep the token server-side.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Token travels in the query string on the main API
Good for Agents that want a single GET to fetch pages through proxies, with parsed JSON for Amazon, Google, Walmart, eBay and Redfin and a batch API of up to 50,000 URLs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 45 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 67 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 62
- Security & auth, 29 against 23
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 61 against 45
- Transparency & trust, 54 against 46
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No status page is linked from the home, pricing, support or docs pages, although the pricing page lists a 99.9% uptime guarantee
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrape.do | ScraperAPI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 45 | ScraperAPI +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 57 | 67 | ScraperAPI +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 74 | ScraperAPI +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 29 | ScraperAPI +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | ScraperAPI +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 61 | ScraperAPI +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 46 | 54 | ScraperAPI +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 43.7 · E | 52.1 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrape.do | ScraperAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrape.do | ScraperAPI (saas.group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrape.do/ | https://api.scraperapi.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | none | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-08-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 5 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
ScraperAPI
One GET request with a key and a URL returns a page, and the MCP server's 28 tools carry read-only and destructive hints. No status page, OpenAPI file, security.txt or certification was found, and the documented default puts the API key in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
ScraperAPI
- Set the client timeout to 70 seconds. The API retries for that long before it returns 500, and a request cancelled earlier is still charged
- Send the key as the
x-sapi-api_keyheader to keep it out of URLs and logs - Pass
max_coston each request, or call/account/urlcostfirst, because domain and anti-bot surcharges vary from 1 to 75 credits - Use
output_format=markdownortextto cut response size, andautoparse=trueonly on supported domains - On 429 reduce concurrency to the plan limit (5 on Free, 20 on Hobby). The request is rejected, not queued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Scrape.do or ScraperAPI?
ScraperAPI scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Scrape.do and ScraperAPI need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Scrape.do and ScraperAPI without installing anything?
Yes. Scrape.do has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrape.do/ and ScraperAPI at https://api.scraperapi.com.
Other comparisons with Scrape.do or ScraperAPI
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Diffbot vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScraperAPI
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrape.do
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs Zyte API
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScraperAPI
- Scrapeless vs ScraperAPI
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Spider
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrape-do-vs-scraperapi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json·/api/v1/tools/scraperapi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrape-do scraperapi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrape-do", "b": "scraperapi"}at/mcp, no key