Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrape.do vs Zyte API
Zyte API scores 69.7 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Which one, for what
Good for Cheap bulk fetching through rotating proxies when you call HTTP directly and keep the token server-side.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Token travels in the query string on the main API
Zyte API B
Good for An agent or pipeline that fetches protected pages and wants the service to choose proxy and browser per site and to bill only success, and teams already on Scrapy.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 62
- Security & auth, 55 against 23
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 45
- Transparency & trust, 66 against 46
Watch for
Request price depends on the target site's tier, from $0.13 to $1.27 per 1,000 HTTP requests and $1.01 to $16.08 with a browser on pay-as-you-go
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrape.do | Zyte API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 85 | Zyte API +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 57 | 85 | Zyte API +28 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 72 | Zyte API +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 55 | Zyte API +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Zyte API +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 77 | Zyte API +32 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 46 | 66 | Zyte API +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 43.7 · E | 69.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrape.do | Zyte API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrape.do | Zyte Group Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrape.do/ | https://api.zyte.com/v1/extract |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under Zyte's terms of service. The Python client is BSD 3-Clause, and the Agentic Web Data plugin is under Zyte's own end-user licence |
| Tools exposed | none | 34 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-09-22 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2024-08-30 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 42k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
Zyte API
One POST endpoint with an OpenAPI 3 contract picks proxies, browser rendering and extraction per site, bills only successful responses, and sends problem+json errors with Retry-After. Prices vary by target site across five tiers, so cost per request isn't known before the site is assigned one, and no dated API changelog was found.
Before you call either
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
Zyte API
- Send the API key as the Basic auth username with an empty password to
https://api.zyte.com/v1/extract. Set only one ofhttpResponseBodyorbrowserHtml, or one extraction field - Ask for
httpResponseBodybeforebrowserHtml. Browser requests cost about eight to thirteen times more per tier - Retry 429, 503 and 520 after the
Retry-Afterseconds, with backoff. They aren't billed. Don't retry 400, 401, 422 or 451 - Read
statusCodein a 200 response. A target site's 404 comes back as a successful, billed Zyte API response - Have the owner set a blocking spending limit on the key you use. A 403
/auth/account-suspendedmeans the limit or the trial month ended
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Scrape.do or Zyte API?
Zyte API scores 69.7 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Scrape.do and Zyte API need an API key?
Scrape.do needs an API key. Zyte API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Scrape.do and Zyte API without installing anything?
Yes. Scrape.do has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrape.do/ and Zyte API at https://api.zyte.com/v1/extract.
Other comparisons with Scrape.do or Zyte API
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Zyte API
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Zyte API
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs Zyte API
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrape.do
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Zyte API
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Zyte API
- Scrapeless vs Zyte API
- Scrapfly vs Zyte API
- ScrapingAnt vs Zyte API
- ScrapingBee vs Zyte API
- Scrapingdog vs Zyte API
- Spider vs Zyte API
- ZenRows vs Zyte API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrape-do-vs-zyte.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json·/api/v1/tools/zyte.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrape-do zyte(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrape-do", "b": "zyte"}at/mcp, no key