Head to head · Fetching pages · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do fetching pages. The largest gap is security & auth, 44 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Firecrawl MCP for
- reliability (+30)
- schema & documentation (+31)
- agent ergonomics (+30)
- security & auth (+44)
- payments & pricing (+15)
- maintenance & community (+42)
- transparency & trust (+27)
Pick Scrape.do for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | Scrape.do | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 40 | Firecrawl MCP +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 57 | Firecrawl MCP +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 62 | Firecrawl MCP +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 23 | Firecrawl MCP +44 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 35 | Firecrawl MCP +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +42 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 49 | Firecrawl MCP +27 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.5 · BB | 44 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | Scrape.do |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | Scrape.do |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.scrape.do/ |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 26 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 2 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrape-do.md