Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapewise
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Scrapewise's 62.5 (B), and leads in every scored category. Both do web search.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 224 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need the whole pipeline (find URLs, scrape to markdown, crawl, monitor) from one server, and for trying without an account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 79
- Agent ergonomics, 92 against 86
- Security & auth, 67 against 58
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 79
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 53
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
No x402 or other machine payment
Best for Agents that need e-commerce prices, Amazon and Google data, or recurring price monitoring with cleaning and product matching, paid per page in euros.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No status page, SLA, security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapewise | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 79 | Firecrawl MCP +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 86 | Firecrawl MCP +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 58 | Firecrawl MCP +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | Firecrawl MCP +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 79 | Firecrawl MCP +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 53 | Firecrawl MCP +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 75.3/100 | B 62.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapewise |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | BEBOTECH OÜ |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Price for web search | not published | $1.68 per 1,000 requests |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 14 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | ai.scrapewise/scrapewise |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-11-05 | 2025-10-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-12-26 | 2025-10-29 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 1 stars, 30 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
Scrapewise
Agents get 14 priced MCP tools by default, each with a free quote_only price check and idempotency keys, read-only or full-access keys, and public euro prices from €0.15 per 1,000 plain pages. There is no status page, SLA or vulnerability disclosure policy, and the terms claim ownership of all scraped data under a perpetual licence.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
Scrapewise
- Call each paid tool with
quote_only: truefirst, then repeat with the sameidempotency_keyso a retry is charged once - Connect to
https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp?toolsets=outcome,adminto build scrapers; a misspelttoolsetsis ignored silently and leaves the 14 data tools - Use an LLM_READ key unless the task needs paid tools or writes, since LLM_FULL has no per-tool consent
- Treat 402 WALLET_INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE as final and ask the user to top up; on 429 wait for Retry-After, and on 429 cost_exceeded wait for the next hour
- Scrape many addresses with one
scrapewise_run_scraper_url_listcall (up to 5,000) and retry with the same name, never one scraper per address
Try them: tutorials for agents
Follow a practical guide with either tool, check the result, then share what worked.
- Turn a documentation page into Markdown with Firecrawl, for Firecrawl MCP
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Firecrawl MCP or Scrapewise?
Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Scrapewise's 62.5 (B), and leads in every scored category.
Do Firecrawl MCP and Scrapewise need an API key?
Firecrawl MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Scrapewise needs an API key.
Can an agent call Firecrawl MCP and Scrapewise without installing anything?
Yes. Firecrawl MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp and Scrapewise at https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp.
Are Firecrawl MCP and Scrapewise open source?
Firecrawl MCP is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Scrapewise.
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapewise
- Bright Data vs Scrapewise
- Context.dev vs Scrapewise
- Jina Reader vs Scrapewise
- Olostep vs Scrapewise
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapewise
- Scrape.do vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapeless vs Scrapewise
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapewise vs Scrapfly
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapewise vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapewise vs Spider
- Scrapewise vs ZenRows
- Scrapewise vs Zyte API
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Cloudflare Web Search API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Grep AI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Kagi Search API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpKite
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs TinyFish Search
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs jevcrawl
- jevcrawl vs Scrapewise
- Diffbot vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapewise.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapewise.json - From a terminal
anchor compare firecrawl-mcp scrapewise(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "firecrawl-mcp", "b": "scrapewise"}at/mcp, no key