Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run

Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 42 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Firecrawl MCP for

  • schema & documentation (+22)
  • agent ergonomics (+42)
  • security & auth (+32)
  • payments & pricing (+15)
  • maintenance & community (+6)
  • transparency & trust (+20)

Pick Scrapeless for

  • reliability (+5)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFirecrawl MCPScrapelessEdge
Reliability16%207075Scrapeless +5
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28866Firecrawl MCP +22
Agent ergonomics13%16.29250Firecrawl MCP +42
Security & auth14%17.56735Firecrawl MCP +32
Payments & pricing10%12.55035Firecrawl MCP +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88781Firecrawl MCP +6
Transparency & trust7%8.87656Firecrawl MCP +20
Negative events≤150-2
Total75.5 · BB54.3 · C

Facts side by side

FactFirecrawl MCPScrapeless
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorFirecrawl (Mendable)Scrapeless (NST Labs Tech)
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcphttps://api.scrapeless.com
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceMITMIT
Tools exposed2625
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-serverio.github.scrapeless-ai/scrapeless-mcp-server
Last release2026-10-012026-09-16
Popularity7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk169 stars, 423 npm/wk, 216 PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (8)2/5 (2)

Verdicts

Firecrawl MCP

Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.

Scrapeless

Hosted streamable HTTP MCP at api.scrapeless.com/mcp with header auth, plus a stdio package, both in the official MCP registry. llms.txt quotes Deep SerpApi at $0.1 per 1,000 while the plan data charges $1 per 1,000 for Google Search.

Before you call either

Firecrawl MCP

  1. Use firecrawl_map to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site
  2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a signup_url for the human
  3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
  4. Poll firecrawl_check_crawl_status rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call
  5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit

Scrapeless

  1. Use scrape_markdown for reading pages and save the browser_* tools for clicks and logins, since browser time bills by the hour
  2. Call browser_close when done so the session and its billing stop
  3. Set limit on crawl_start. Unset, it defaults to 10,000 pages
  4. Crawls are asynchronous. Call crawl_start, then poll crawl_result with the returned id
  5. Set SCRAPELESS_API_KEY for the stdio server. Older guides use SCRAPELESS_KEY, which still works as a fallback

Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapeless

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.