Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run
Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless
Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 42 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Firecrawl MCP for
- schema & documentation (+22)
- agent ergonomics (+42)
- security & auth (+32)
- payments & pricing (+15)
- maintenance & community (+6)
- transparency & trust (+20)
Pick Scrapeless for
- reliability (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapeless | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 75 | Scrapeless +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 66 | Firecrawl MCP +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 92 | 50 | Firecrawl MCP +42 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 35 | Firecrawl MCP +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 35 | Firecrawl MCP +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 81 | Firecrawl MCP +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 56 | Firecrawl MCP +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 75.5 · BB | 54.3 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapeless |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | Scrapeless (NST Labs Tech) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp | https://api.scrapeless.com |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 25 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server | io.github.scrapeless-ai/scrapeless-mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-16 |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 169 stars, 423 npm/wk, 216 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Firecrawl MCP
Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.
Scrapeless
Hosted streamable HTTP MCP at api.scrapeless.com/mcp with header auth, plus a stdio package, both in the official MCP registry. llms.txt quotes Deep SerpApi at $0.1 per 1,000 while the plan data charges $1 per 1,000 for Google Search.
Before you call either
Firecrawl MCP
- Use
firecrawl_mapto list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site - On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a
signup_urlfor the human - Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
- Poll
firecrawl_check_crawl_statusrather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call - Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit
Scrapeless
- Use scrape_markdown for reading pages and save the browser_* tools for clicks and logins, since browser time bills by the hour
- Call browser_close when done so the session and its billing stop
- Set limit on crawl_start. Unset, it defaults to 10,000 pages
- Crawls are asynchronous. Call crawl_start, then poll crawl_result with the returned id
- Set SCRAPELESS_API_KEY for the stdio server. Older guides use SCRAPELESS_KEY, which still works as a fallback
Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapeless
- Bright Data vs Scrapeless
- Jina Reader vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapeless
- Scrapeless vs Scrapfly
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs Spider
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io
- Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi
- Firecrawl MCP vs Serper
- Firecrawl MCP vs Spider
- Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu
- Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt
- Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapeless
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapeless.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless.md