# Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 42 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless.md (~2,050 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 42 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- Scrapeless: C 54.3, rank #326 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapeless.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for schema & documentation (+22), agent ergonomics (+42), security & auth (+32), payments & pricing (+15), maintenance & community (+6), transparency & trust (+20). Pick Scrapeless for reliability (+5).

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapeless |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 66 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 50 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 35 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 81 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 56 |