Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run

Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 39 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Firecrawl MCP for

  • reliability (+10)
  • agent ergonomics (+5)
  • security & auth (+39)
  • maintenance & community (+29)
  • transparency & trust (+16)

Pick Olostep for

  • payments & pricing (+15)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFirecrawl MCPOlostepEdge
Reliability16%207060Firecrawl MCP +10
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28884Firecrawl MCP +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.29287Firecrawl MCP +5
Security & auth14%17.56728Firecrawl MCP +39
Payments & pricing10%12.55065Olostep +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88758Firecrawl MCP +29
Transparency & trust7%8.87660Firecrawl MCP +16
Negative events≤1500
Total75.5 · BB63.1 · B

Facts side by side

FactFirecrawl MCPOlostep
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorFirecrawl (Mendable)Olostep Technologies, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcphttps://api.olostep.com
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nopayer tooling only
LicenceMITMIT
Tools exposed2611
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-serverio.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server
Last release2026-10-012026-07-15
Popularity7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (8)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Firecrawl MCP

Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment.

Olostep

OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.

Before you call either

Firecrawl MCP

  1. Use firecrawl_map to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site
  2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a signup_url for the human
  3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page
  4. Poll firecrawl_check_crawl_status rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call
  5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit

Olostep

  1. For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
  2. Pass storage.expires_in if you need results after about 7 days
  3. Don't ask for json output without a parser or an llm_extract schema
  4. Hosted MCP wants Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools
  5. Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one

Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Olostep

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.