Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
ScrapeGraphAI has a score of 68.3 (B) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Olostep for
- agent ergonomics (+15)
Pick ScrapeGraphAI for
- security & auth (+11)
- payments & pricing (+25)
- maintenance & community (+12)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | ScrapeGraphAI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 64 | ScrapeGraphAI +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 88 | ScrapeGraphAI +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 72 | Olostep +15 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 39 | ScrapeGraphAI +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 90 | ScrapeGraphAI +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 70 | ScrapeGraphAI +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 61 | ScrapeGraphAI +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 68.3 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | ScrapeGraphAI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | ScrapeGraphAI |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://v2-api.scrapegraphai.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | payer tooling only | payer tooling only |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 20 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | io.github.ScrapeGraphAI/scrapegraph-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 2.4k npm/wk, 46k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Olostep
OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.
ScrapeGraphAI
An agent can mint an account and key over x402 or MPP with no signup. Rate limits and plan prices differ between docs pages.
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
ScrapeGraphAI
- Use
scrapewith the markdown format (1 credit) before reaching forextract(5 credits) - Read
GET https://v2-api.scrapegraphai.com/api/agent/protocolsfor current packs and prices before paying over x402 - MCP tool calls stop at 60 seconds. Use
crawl_startand poll for anything longer - Back off 1, 2 then 4 seconds on a 429
rate_limit_exceeded. No Retry-After is sent - Use Orthogonal's x402 gateway when you need to pay per call without a key
Other comparisons with Olostep or ScrapeGraphAI
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapeless
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Spider
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapeGraphAI
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapegraphai.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai.md