Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs Scrapfly
Scrapfly has a score of 69.8 (B) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is security & auth, 42 points.
OlostepOlostep Technologies, Inc. · HTTP API
B63.1/100#210 of 452
ScrapflyScrapfly (Joam Intelligence, LLC) · HTTP API
B69.8/100#107 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Olostep for
- reliability (+10)
- agent ergonomics (+7)
- payments & pricing (+25)
Pick Scrapfly for
- schema & documentation (+11)
- security & auth (+42)
- maintenance & community (+26)
- transparency & trust (+17)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | Scrapfly | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 50 | Olostep +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 95 | Scrapfly +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 80 | Olostep +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 70 | Scrapfly +42 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 40 | Olostep +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 84 | Scrapfly +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 77 | Scrapfly +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 69.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | Scrapfly |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | Scrapfly (Joam Intelligence, LLC) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://api.scrapfly.io/scrape |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | payer tooling only | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 61 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | io.scrapfly.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 14 stars, 21k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
Scrapfly
- Send
X-Scrapfly-Api-Keyas a header rather thankey=so the key stays out of logs - Pass
unblocker=falseto the MCP web_scrape tool for plain pages, since it's on when omitted.aspis the deprecated alias - Set
cost_budgeton each scrape so an Unblocker upgrade can't blow through credits - Check
retryablein the error body before retrying, and stop onERR::THROTTLE::MAX_API_CREDIT_BUDGET_EXCEEDED - Use web_get_page for a simple fetch and save cloud_browser_open for pages that need clicks
Other comparisons with Olostep or Scrapfly
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapfly
- Scrapeless vs Scrapfly
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Spider
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapfly
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapfly.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/olostep-vs-scrapfly.md