Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Nexscope vs Scrapfly
Scrapfly scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Nexscope's 46.2 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 533 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Nexscope D
Best for Agents that research ecommerce products, competitors, keywords, sourcing and patents across Amazon, TikTok Shop, Walmart, Temu, 1688 and other marketplaces, and that also make listing images and video, on one credit balance.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Scrapfly loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The MCP connection advertises the full catalogue of 382 tools, with no toolsets or read-only subset
Scrapfly BB
Best for An agent that needs scrape, screenshot, extraction, crawl and a hosted browser from one key, with errors it can branch on.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 39
- Schema & documentation, 95 against 64
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 44
- Security & auth, 75 against 41
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 84 against 65
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 41
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The open-source MCP server registers 62 tools at once, a heavy tools/list
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Scrapfly +46
Nexscope 39
Hosted lines, graded on the remote MCP server and the REST API at api.nexscope.ai. No status page is linked from the home page, llms.txt, the API quickstart or the MCP map, and none was found (0). With no page there is no incident history to read (5). The pricing page publishes requests a second and concurrency per plan, the same for API and MCP, with 1 and 1 on the trial, 3 and 2 on Starter, 5 and 4 on Growth, 10 and 8 on Pro (15). The quickstart calls 429 an 'execution admission rate limit' and says to honour Retry-After on 429 and 503 when present. No idempotency key exists. The repository says 'Do not blindly retry POST requests' and to check whether a task was created before resubmitting, and the MCP tool pages say a reconnecting client should query existing async work rather than resubmit. SoldFetch earned 15 with idempotency keys and SandBase 11 with keys on some writes, so guidance without keys earns 9 (9 of 15). No SLA, and the terms say 'We cannot guarantee the Service will be available at all times' (0). No beta or preview label on the API or the MCP server (10). 0+5+15+9+0+10 = 39.
Scrapfly 85
scrapfly.io/status answers with Statuspage's status JSON, which names its page as scrapfly.statuspage.io. That page has 25 components and incident history back to 2022, read through its history feed on 1 November. The 1 October check read only the overall state and found no history (20, was 10). The newest incident is a Scrapium rendering fault on 21 May 2026, so nothing is posted in the 90 days from 3 August (30, was 5). Concurrency per plan is published (5 on Discovery to 100 on Enterprise) and each project has a configurable per-minute throttle (15). The error catalogue marks every code retryable or not and has three ERR::THROTTLE codes, but we found no Retry-After header or backoff guidance on the errors or throttling pages (10 of 15). The terms disclaim uptime and no uptime SLA is published, and the pricing page's SLA mentions cover support response on Enterprise (0). The Scrape API is GA. Vault and alerting are beta, outside the main surface (10). 20+30+15+10+0+10 = 85.
Agent ergonomics Scrapfly +36
Nexscope 44
Read on the MCP server, with the REST API where a line covers it. The MCP map lists 382 tools and says the category manifests 'narrow metadata for your integration; the MCP connection still advertises the full catalog'. That is more than 30 tools with no toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subset found (5). Search tools page by page (about 20 results), with filters such as marketplace, category node, sort and device per tool, but no general pagination model or field selection, and output size depends on each tool (12 of 20). By default business errors answer HTTP 200 with an outer code. The X-Nexscope-Http-Status: semantic header maps them to HTTP statuses, the OpenAPI file names codes such as DATA_IMAGE_DOWNLOAD_FAILED and CAPABILITY_BACKEND_UNAVAILABLE in field text, and MCP errors aren't documented. SandBase earned 16 with typed bridge errors (11 of 20). Data calls only read. No idempotency keys and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint documented. Async jobs return a taskId with a poll tool and a rule not to resubmit, and 1688 order, payment-link, receipt and cancel calls need an explicit JSON true confirmation (8 of 20). Few required parameters with defaults on most. No official SDK package, only standard-library clients in the repository for JavaScript and Python, which SoldFetch earned 8 for (8 of 15). 5+12+11+8+8 = 44.
Scrapfly 80
The open-source server registers 62 tools by default in v1.4.0 (5 web scraping, 2 account, 9 Cloud Browser sessions, 17 page interaction, 2 WebMCP, 15 credential vault, 12 alerts), all at once, and the docs list a smaller core. There's a code path to mount interaction tools per session, but registration is always-on for clients that don't refetch. On the API side, format=markdown and the extraction API keep responses small, and since v1.4.0 the scrape tools report api_cost and cost_details (10 of 25). Output format, extraction templates, crawler limits and 100-URL batches (15 of 20). Error codes an agent can branch on, with retryable and billed flags (20). Tools carry readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint, and mutating vault and alert tools need confirm=true after a preview (20). web_get_page works with a URL alone, and official SDKs exist for Python, TypeScript, Go and Rust (15). 10+15+20+20+15 = 80.
Security & auth Scrapfly +34
Nexscope 41
The MCP server takes OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and one scope, mcp:tools, per the tool pages, or a Bearer nk- API key. Keys are created by a person under API Access, shown once, and can be expired, disabled or deleted, with no scopes or rotation found. The OAuth metadata on api.nexscope.ai wasn't read. No query-string key option was found. Manifold earned 22 with OAuth and hashed keys whose storage it documents (20 of 30). Most tools read. Writes exist (1688 procurement on the user's own buyer account, Amazon Ads entity operations through an owned connection, paid generation jobs), and the 1688 calls need an explicit JSON true per action after a preview, with the guide saying to get the user's approval first. Credits cap spend. No read-only key or tool allowlist (12 of 20). Tools return third-party listings, reviews, social posts and web pages, and no prompt-injection guidance was found. Manifold, the closest marketing-data MCP, took 0 (0). The Account credits and Account usage APIs, costToken in data responses and credits charged on task results give per-call visibility. No key-level audit was found (9 of 15). security.txt answered a client error. No disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (0 of 20). 20+12+0+9+0 = 41.
Scrapfly 75
OAuth 2 on the hosted MCP with dashboard revocation, open to all plans. API keys are per project, live or test, and since 15 April 2026 can be restricted to products (30). The canonical API form puts the key in the key query parameter and the MCP also accepts ?key=, so less 10 (20 of 30). Product-restricted keys, confirm=true on every mutating vault and alert tool, info_api_key off in server-key mode, and the self-hosted HTTP server binds loopback by default. Since v1.4.0 Cloud Browser sessions are scoped to the API key that opened them (15 of 20). The source gates mutating vault tools behind a preview step because prompt injection can reach them and redacts keys from CDP URLs. We found no user-facing guidance on untrusted page content (8 of 15). Monitoring shows every call as a log with its error, credit cost line by line and Unblocker state, with replay, per the 24 October release notes, as well as per-domain metrics and alerting. The 1 October check couldn't confirm per-request logs (15, was 10). security.txt valid until 30 April 2027, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and HIPAA claims on the pricing page, and a public SOC 3 report since 21 April 2026. No bug bounty found (17 of 20). 20+15+8+15+17 = 75.
Transparency & trust Scrapfly +34
Nexscope 41
The editorial half. The service is closed. The terms (8 October 2026) name ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. under Singapore law with no registration number or address. The repository's MIT licence covers client code only, and the documentation and definitions stay copyright Nexscope. Scrapewise earned 15 for closed terms with MIT side code (15 of 30). The privacy policy (8 October 2026) says uploads are not used to train AI models and that connected selling-partner data is deleted or de-identified when no longer needed, but 'this policy does not specify a single deletion deadline for all data', and no DPA was found. SandBase took 12 with no retention periods (10 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices. The terms promise notice of material changes before they take effect where practicable, and the MCP map keeps a legacy v1 beside v2 (3 of 20). Analytics and advertising vendors are named (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Ahrefs, Google Ads, X, FirstPromoter), but hosting, AI processing and payment providers only by type, with no data locations. The repository's source notes say supplier references 'are presented as Nexscope', so the data suppliers go unnamed except LinkFox Agent for 1688 authorisation (5 of 20). 15+10+3+5 = 33. The provenance half is computed from the provenance block.
Scrapfly 75
Closed service with terms updated 2026-09-30 under US law. SDKs are BSD 2-Clause, and the MCP source is public with no LICENSE file and ISC in package.json (15 of 30). Privacy policy updated 14 May 2026 with a published DPA and HIPAA BAA, but retention is as long as necessary, and the retention of scraped content isn't stated (18 of 30). Release notes date deprecations and removals, for example Scrapium v153 dropping legacy network interception on 11 September. No standing deprecation policy found (15 of 20). Stripe, Google Analytics, Google Ads and Google Cloud are named, with SCC and Data Privacy Framework transfers, but there's no full subprocessor list (10 of 20). The release notes still date each CDP removal, most recently Storage.getRelatedWebsiteSets in Scrapium v156 on 26 October. Not otherwise re-read on 1 November. 15+18+15+10 = 58.
Schema & documentation Scrapfly +31
Nexscope 64
A public OpenAPI 3.1 file at api.nexscope.ai/openapi.json, about 3.8 MB, linked from the quickstart. Visible request bodies are typed with required fields, patterns, enums and additionalProperties: false, but responses are open data objects and the components section, with the security scheme and the shared error response, wasn't reached. In the repository 166 of 252 request definitions are field descriptors rather than JSON Schema. The hosted tools/list wasn't read. SoldFetch took 17 with untyped responses and SandBase 22 with components unread (19 of 25). llms.txt on www.nexscope.ai and Markdown references for every API in the repository (10). MCP tool descriptions are one line ('Find Amazon products by keyword and marketplace. Results come back as structured JSON.'), with no when-not-to-use. The repository's references carry long trigger text ('trigger this skill whenever their need involves real-time Amazon search results'), not guidance on when to pick another tool (10 of 20). Tool pages list types, defaults, enums and length limits, but the Amazon Search page marks no argument required and omits the keyword its own examples pass, and many limits sit in prose (8 of 15). Every API has a request sample, a response fixture and cURL, JavaScript and Python clients, though most fixtures are labelled historical. Errors are an HTTP table, two named codes (11209, 12001) and a semantic error response whose schema wasn't read. MCP errors aren't documented (10 of 15). Path versioning under /v1, MCP v2 beside a legacy v1, and a dated OpenAPI version label, but no public changelog. SandBase earned 7 on the same pattern (7 of 15). 19+10+10+8+10+7 = 64.
Scrapfly 95
A Swagger reference per the 30 September check, and the MCP server exposes it as a web_scraping_openapi_specification resource. Every MCP tool has JSON Schema inputs generated from typed Go structs (25). llms.txt and Markdown twins such as pricing.md per the 30 September check. robots.txt still disallows /docs/llms.txt and the .md twins for crawlers it doesn't name, so they weren't re-read on 1 November (10). Descriptions say when to use a tool and when to switch, for example web_get_page falls back to web_scrape for tuning and to cloud_browser_open for interaction. A few are long and steer the model's next step (17 of 20). Typed inputs with enums, for example the vault service discriminator, and required fields (13 of 15). Error catalogue of 100+ ERR:: codes, each with HTTP status, retryable and billed flags and its own doc link (15). Dated release notes, newest 26 October 2026 (15). 25+10+17+13+15+15 = 95.
Maintenance & community Scrapfly +19
Nexscope 65
Read as a closed service with a public documentation repository. The repository synced the released 1688 procurement contracts on 9 November 2026 and committed again on 10 November (30). No releases or changelog. The dated record is the registry's four versions on 14 and 16 October, repository commits on 8, 9, 20 and 29 October and 2, 9 and 10 November, and source notes dating WooCommerce (29 October) and design search (2 November) additions. SoldFetch earned 10 for dated commits without releases (10 of 20). No public changelog. Support is service@nexscope.ai, WhatsApp and a booked call, untested. The repository's one merged pull request came from the organisation itself, and GitHub's API refused us, so issues weren't read (5 of 15). The official MCP registry lists io.github.nexscope/ecommerce, active, latest 1.0.3 of 16 October 2026, read first-hand (15). A CI workflow runs offline catalogue validation and unit tests on standard-library clients with no dependencies. The run results weren't read (5 of 10). 30+10+5+15+5 = 65.
Scrapfly 84
Scrapium v156 in the release notes on 26 October 2026 and MCP v1.4.0 on 15 October (30). MCP tags v1.3.1 to v1.3.3 (26 and 27 August), v1.3.4 (8 September) and v1.4.0 (15 October), SDKs 0.12.0 on 8 September, and dated release notes on 14, 24 and 26 August, 11, 23 and 25 September, 7, 24 and 26 October (20). Dated release notes most weeks and a support address. We couldn't read GitHub issues, since github.com refuses our reader (12 of 25). In the official MCP registry as io.scrapfly.mcp/mcp under the vendor's domain, though the entry still lists 1.0.0, and the SDKs are current (15). MCP moved to Go 1.27 on 23 October. Its CI runs only a reference check and the npm publish, while the TypeScript SDK runs tests in CI (7 of 10). 30+20+12+15+7 = 84.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nexscope | Scrapfly | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 39 | 85 | Scrapfly +46 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 95 | Scrapfly +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 44 | 80 | Scrapfly +36 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 41 | 75 | Scrapfly +34 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Scrapfly +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 84 | Scrapfly +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 41 | 75 | Scrapfly +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | D 46.2/100 | BB 74.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nexscope | Scrapfly |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. | Scrapfly (Joam Intelligence, LLC) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.nexscope.ai/mcp | https://api.scrapfly.io/scrape |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Nexscope terms (last updated 8 October 2026), whose contracting party is ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. of Singapore. The OpenAPI file's licence is 'Proprietary API; use subject to Nexscope Terms'. In github.com/nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-api only the example clients, validation scripts, tests and workflow are MIT. The API documentation, catalogue, definitions and sample data stay copyright Nexscope | none |
| Tools exposed | 382 | 62 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.nexscope/ecommerce | io.scrapfly.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | 2026-09-30 |
| Privacy policy last updated | not read yet | 2026-05-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 14 stars, 21k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 4/5 (2) |
How the scores have moved
Nexscope
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Nexscope
An agent can reach Amazon, TikTok Shop, Temu, 1688 and other marketplace data, plus image and video models, on one credit balance through a remote MCP server with OAuth or a REST API with a public OpenAPI file. The connection loads 382 tools at once, and there is no status page, changelog or idempotency key.
Scrapfly
The error catalogue documents HTTP status, retry behaviour and billing for over 100 codes, and the Statuspage history shows no incident since May 2026. The MCP server loads 62 tools at once, and the API's canonical form puts the key in the URL.
Before you call either
Nexscope
- Check the outer
codeis 0 before readingdata, or sendX-Nexscope-Http-Status: semanticto get HTTP error statuses. - Call an image or video tool once, keep the
taskId, and pollnexscope_media_task_result. A second call bills a second job. - Read the tool's credit cost before a call. Each tool costs at least 10 credits and some cost over 300.
- Before you set a 1688 confirmation field to
true, show the user the preview and get approval. - If the server returns 429 or 503, wait for
Retry-Afterwhen present and back off.
Scrapfly
- Send
X-Scrapfly-Api-Keyas a header rather thankey=so the key stays out of logs - Pass
unblocker=falseto the MCP web_scrape tool for plain pages, since it's on when omitted.aspis the deprecated alias - Set
cost_budgeton each scrape so an Unblocker upgrade can't blow through credits - Check
retryablein the error body before retrying, and stop onERR::THROTTLE::MAX_API_CREDIT_BUDGET_EXCEEDED - Use web_get_page for a simple fetch and save cloud_browser_open for pages that need clicks
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nexscope or Scrapfly?
Scrapfly scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Nexscope's 46.2 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Can an agent call Nexscope and Scrapfly without installing anything?
Yes. Nexscope has a hosted endpoint at https://api.nexscope.ai/mcp and Scrapfly at https://api.scrapfly.io/scrape.
Other comparisons with Nexscope or Scrapfly
- Bright Data vs Scrapfly
- BrowserAct vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapfly
- fastCRW vs Scrapfly
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Microlink vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Outcrawl vs Scrapfly
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapfly
- Scrapeless vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- Scrapewise vs Scrapfly
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Spider
- Scrapfly vs WebScraping.AI
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs Zyte API
- BrowserAct vs Nexscope
- Context.dev vs Nexscope
- Crawl4AI vs Nexscope
- fastCRW vs Nexscope
- Decodo Web Data API vs Nexscope
- Diffbot vs Nexscope
- Diffbot vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs Nexscope
- jevcrawl vs Nexscope
- Microlink vs Nexscope
- Nexscope vs Olostep
- Nexscope vs Outcrawl
- Nexscope vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Nexscope vs PrintFriendly MCP server
- Nexscope vs Qovia
- Nexscope vs ScrapeAtlas
- Nexscope vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Nexscope vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Nexscope vs ScraperAPI
- Nexscope vs Scrapewise
- Nexscope vs ScrapingAnt
- Nexscope vs ScrapingBee
- Nexscope vs Scrapingdog
- Nexscope vs SoldFetch
- Nexscope vs Spider
- Nexscope vs WebScraping.AI
- Nexscope vs ZenRows
- Nexscope vs Zyte API
- Qovia vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapfly
- Scrapfly vs SoldFetch
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapfly
- jevcrawl vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator vs Scrapfly
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nexscope-vs-scrapfly.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nexscope.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapfly.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nexscope scrapfly(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nexscope", "b": "scrapfly"}at/mcp, no key