Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Nexscope vs SoldFetch
SoldFetch scores 58 (C) on agent readiness against Nexscope's 46.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nexscope leads on maintenance & community. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 533 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Nexscope D
Best for Agents that research ecommerce products, competitors, keywords, sourcing and patents across Amazon, TikTok Shop, Walmart, Temu, 1688 and other marketplaces, and that also make listing images and video, on one credit balance.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 65 against 49
Watch for
The MCP connection advertises the full catalogue of 382 tools, with no toolsets or read-only subset
Best for Agents and resale tools that need sold and active eBay listings from the US, UK or German sites for comparables or price observations, at a few dollars per thousand pages, with retries that don't double-bill.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 39
- Agent ergonomics, 75 against 44
- Security & auth, 62 against 41
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
Watch for
No legal entity, address or named jurisdiction in the terms, privacy policy or about page, and the GitHub owner is not named on the site
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent ergonomics SoldFetch +31
Nexscope 44
Read on the MCP server, with the REST API where a line covers it. The MCP map lists 382 tools and says the category manifests 'narrow metadata for your integration; the MCP connection still advertises the full catalog'. That is more than 30 tools with no toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subset found (5). Search tools page by page (about 20 results), with filters such as marketplace, category node, sort and device per tool, but no general pagination model or field selection, and output size depends on each tool (12 of 20). By default business errors answer HTTP 200 with an outer code. The X-Nexscope-Http-Status: semantic header maps them to HTTP statuses, the OpenAPI file names codes such as DATA_IMAGE_DOWNLOAD_FAILED and CAPABILITY_BACKEND_UNAVAILABLE in field text, and MCP errors aren't documented. SandBase earned 16 with typed bridge errors (11 of 20). Data calls only read. No idempotency keys and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint documented. Async jobs return a taskId with a poll tool and a rule not to resubmit, and 1688 order, payment-link, receipt and cancel calls need an explicit JSON true confirmation (8 of 20). Few required parameters with defaults on most. No official SDK package, only standard-library clients in the repository for JavaScript and Python, which SoldFetch earned 8 for (8 of 15). 5+12+11+8+8 = 44.
SoldFetch 75
API reading. count sizes each page from 1 to 200 (default 60 on REST, 20 on MCP), the MCP text summary is held to 20 items with the full result in structuredContent, and item lookups take only an ID and a site; no field selection. On the MCP reading three tools would score 25 (20 of 25). Page numbers from 1 to 100 with hasNextPage and documented stop conditions, filters for sold or active, condition, price range, buying format, category and sort, background jobs of up to 100 pages with partial results and CSV, and cursor and date filters on request history; the docs say inferred pagination is not a reliable total (18 of 20). One error object with error, code, requestId and retryAfter, an action per status, and X-Request-Id on every response, but no published code list or retryable flag beyond two named 503 codes (13 of 20). Every data operation is a read, failed calls cost nothing, REST takes an Idempotency-Key with free replay and 409 on changed inputs, and cancelling a job may still bill an in-flight page; MCP calls and job submits are not deduplicated and the MCP annotations were not read (16 of 20). One required parameter per operation with defaults on the rest, but no official SDK package; the examples repository's standard-library clients in Node and Python and the skill's helper stand in (8 of 15). 20+18+13+16+8 = 75.
Security & auth SoldFetch +21
Nexscope 41
The MCP server takes OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and one scope, mcp:tools, per the tool pages, or a Bearer nk- API key. Keys are created by a person under API Access, shown once, and can be expired, disabled or deleted, with no scopes or rotation found. The OAuth metadata on api.nexscope.ai wasn't read. No query-string key option was found. Manifold earned 22 with OAuth and hashed keys whose storage it documents (20 of 30). Most tools read. Writes exist (1688 procurement on the user's own buyer account, Amazon Ads entity operations through an owned connection, paid generation jobs), and the 1688 calls need an explicit JSON true per action after a preview, with the guide saying to get the user's approval first. Credits cap spend. No read-only key or tool allowlist (12 of 20). Tools return third-party listings, reviews, social posts and web pages, and no prompt-injection guidance was found. Manifold, the closest marketing-data MCP, took 0 (0). The Account credits and Account usage APIs, costToken in data responses and credits charged on task results give per-call visibility. No key-level audit was found (9 of 15). security.txt answered a client error. No disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (0 of 20). 20+12+0+9+0 = 41.
SoldFetch 62
Workspace API keys created and revoked in the dashboard, shown once and stored as digests per the privacy policy, several per workspace so one can replace another, accepted in one header only; no scopes, expiry or OAuth, and the docs say never to put a key in a URL, with no query-string option documented (20 of 30). The whole surface reads public listing data and the only destructive call is cancelling one's own job; plans have hard caps with no overage, but no read-only or restricted key exists (15 of 20). Every response carries third-party listing text. The AI agents guide, the MCP README, SECURITY.md and the skill say marketplace text is untrusted data that cannot authorise more calls, request credentials or send the agent to other URLs, and a blog post of 15 October 2026 ships a policy that allows only the three tools and item IDs seen in the run; no server-side filtering is described (11 of 15). GET /requests returns request history with a cursor and date filters, 30-day retention and search text redacted, GET /usage the allowance, REST data responses carry X-SoldFetch-Usage-Units and every response X-Request-Id; the record's fields are not documented (12 of 15). No security.txt (client error), bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the repositories' SECURITY.md files give a reporting route to contact@soldfetch.com (4 of 20). 20+15+11+12+4 = 62.
Reliability SoldFetch +16
Nexscope 39
Hosted lines, graded on the remote MCP server and the REST API at api.nexscope.ai. No status page is linked from the home page, llms.txt, the API quickstart or the MCP map, and none was found (0). With no page there is no incident history to read (5). The pricing page publishes requests a second and concurrency per plan, the same for API and MCP, with 1 and 1 on the trial, 3 and 2 on Starter, 5 and 4 on Growth, 10 and 8 on Pro (15). The quickstart calls 429 an 'execution admission rate limit' and says to honour Retry-After on 429 and 503 when present. No idempotency key exists. The repository says 'Do not blindly retry POST requests' and to check whether a task was created before resubmitting, and the MCP tool pages say a reconnecting client should query existing async work rather than resubmit. SoldFetch earned 15 with idempotency keys and SandBase 11 with keys on some writes, so guidance without keys earns 9 (9 of 15). No SLA, and the terms say 'We cannot guarantee the Service will be available at all times' (0). No beta or preview label on the API or the MCP server (10). 0+5+15+9+0+10 = 39.
SoldFetch 55
Hosted reading, for the REST API with the MCP server that shares its limits. SoldFetch's own status page at https://soldfetch.com/status lists ebay.com, ebay.co.uk and ebay.de as components, checked every five minutes, all operational on 3 November 2026, but keeps no incident log or uptime history, so half credit (10 of 20). No readable incident history, so the floor (5). Limits are published with numbers, 10 data requests a minute and 1 concurrent on Basic and 60 a minute and 5 concurrent on paid plans, per workspace across keys and interfaces, with a separate 60 a minute for usage and history (15). 429 is documented for workspace rate, concurrency and quota limits, 503 upstream_rate_limited carries a Retry-After header in seconds and the error schema an optional retryAfter, the docs ask for bounded backoff with jitter and name what not to retry, and REST data calls take an Idempotency-Key with a free replay for 24 hours and 409 on changed inputs; job submissions have no key, but the docs say to check existing jobs before resubmitting and allow one active job per workspace (15). No SLA on self-service plans; terms 11.2 keep uptime commitments to a signed enterprise order form (0). No beta or preview label on the API or the MCP server; three of the eight recognised eBay sites are enabled 'at launch' (10). 10+5+15+15+0+10 = 55.
Maintenance & community Nexscope +16
Nexscope 65
Read as a closed service with a public documentation repository. The repository synced the released 1688 procurement contracts on 9 November 2026 and committed again on 10 November (30). No releases or changelog. The dated record is the registry's four versions on 14 and 16 October, repository commits on 8, 9, 20 and 29 October and 2, 9 and 10 November, and source notes dating WooCommerce (29 October) and design search (2 November) additions. SoldFetch earned 10 for dated commits without releases (10 of 20). No public changelog. Support is service@nexscope.ai, WhatsApp and a booked call, untested. The repository's one merged pull request came from the organisation itself, and GitHub's API refused us, so issues weren't read (5 of 15). The official MCP registry lists io.github.nexscope/ecommerce, active, latest 1.0.3 of 16 October 2026, read first-hand (15). A CI workflow runs offline catalogue validation and unit tests on standard-library clients with no dependencies. The run results weren't read (5 of 10). 30+10+5+15+5 = 65.
SoldFetch 49
Closed service. The latest dated changes are commits to all three public repositories and four blog posts on 27 October 2026, and the docs sitemap dates the authentication page 30 October 2026 (30). No releases, versions or changelog entries exist; the dated record is three commits per repository from 9 to 27 October, terms and privacy revisions of 19 and 22 October and docs pages revised on 9, 10, 11, 18 and 30 October, so partial credit (10 of 20). No public changelog; support is a contact form and contact@soldfetch.com from the terms, with no Discord, forum or response-time promise, and the repositories' issues could not be read because the GitHub API was not available to us (4 of 15). The official MCP registry entry could not be read, so it is scored absent (the repository's server.json names io.github.ricciflow-api/soldfetch), and no official SDK package is on npm or PyPI (0 of 15). Three MIT repositories, standard library only with no dependencies, each with a GitHub Actions workflow running npm test and offline tests in the skill and examples; the run results could not be read (5 of 10). 30+10+4+0+5 = 49.
Payments & pricing SoldFetch +5
Nexscope 35
No x402, MPP or L402 on pricing, the quickstart, the MCP map, llms.txt or the visible OpenAPI paths. Credits come from a subscription or a Data top-up (0). Plans and credits per plan are public without a login ($29 for 30,000, $55 for 75,000, $129 for 150,000), and tool pages show credits per call, such as Amazon Search from 21 credits with a recent average of 30. Many tools on the MCP map list no cost and pricing is marked 'dynamic-credits'. Manifold earned 20 with a cost for every tool (15 of 20). A Free Trial of 1,000 credits for 3 days with 'No credit card required', API and MCP limits included. Creative API keys need a subscription (20). A person signs in through the browser to approve OAuth or create a key, and no keyless or programmatic route was found (0). 0+15+20+0 = 35.
SoldFetch 40
No x402, MPP or L402 on the pricing page, terms, llms.txt or docs, and no third-party machine payment route was found; the RapidAPI alias does not take RapidAPI authentication (0). Per-unit pricing is public without a login, 1 unit per successful search page or item lookup, $9 for 2,000, $29 for 10,000 and $79 for 50,000 a month, with what is and isn't charged stated (20). Basic gives 100 units once and the terms say no payment method is required (20). A person signs in through the browser and creates a key in the dashboard; no keyless API route or programmatic key creation, and the anonymous playground is a web page for people (0). 0+20+20+0 = 40.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nexscope | SoldFetch | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 39 | 55 | SoldFetch +16 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 68 | SoldFetch +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 44 | 75 | SoldFetch +31 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 41 | 62 | SoldFetch +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | SoldFetch +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 49 | Nexscope +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 41 | 41 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 46.2/100 | C 58/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nexscope | SoldFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. | SoldFetch |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.nexscope.ai/mcp | https://soldfetch.com |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Nexscope terms (last updated 8 October 2026), whose contracting party is ECOCREATE TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. of Singapore. The OpenAPI file's licence is 'Proprietary API; use subject to Nexscope Terms'. In github.com/nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-api only the example clients, validation scripts, tests and workflow are MIT. The API documentation, catalogue, definitions and sample data stay copyright Nexscope | Proprietary hosted service under SoldFetch's terms of service (effective 22 September 2026, updated 19 October 2026), which name no legal entity or jurisdiction. The public MCP metadata, agent skill and API examples repositories are MIT, copyright SoldFetch |
| Tools exposed | 382 | 3 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.nexscope/ecommerce | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-27 |
Verdicts
Nexscope
An agent can reach Amazon, TikTok Shop, Temu, 1688 and other marketplace data, plus image and video models, on one credit balance through a remote MCP server with OAuth or a REST API with a public OpenAPI file. The connection loads 382 tools at once, and there is no status page, changelog or idempotency key.
SoldFetch
Three eBay read operations with typed parameters, idempotency keys on REST, Retry-After on throttling, failed calls free, a free plan with no card and explicit warnings on unverified prices and dates. No legal entity, no changelog, SLA or security.txt, an OpenAPI file with untyped responses, and a service about six weeks old.
Before you call either
Nexscope
- Check the outer
codeis 0 before readingdata, or sendX-Nexscope-Http-Status: semanticto get HTTP error statuses. - Call an image or video tool once, keep the
taskId, and pollnexscope_media_task_result. A second call bills a second job. - Read the tool's credit cost before a call. Each tool costs at least 10 credits and some cost over 300.
- Before you set a 1688 confirmation field to
true, show the user the preview and get approval. - If the server returns 429 or 503, wait for
Retry-Afterwhen present and back off.
SoldFetch
- Read
GET /v1/capabilities(no key, free) before choosingebaySite; only ebay.com, ebay.co.uk and ebay.de were enabled on 3 November 2026. - Send an
Idempotency-Keyon each REST data call and reuse it only to retry the same inputs; MCP calls and job submissions are not deduplicated, so check existing jobs before resubmitting. - Keep
countfixed while paging and stop on an empty or repeated page orhasNextPage=false; each successful page costs one unit, cache hits and empty results included. - Treat a 503
upstream_blockedon a category-only sold search as unknown, not zero, and retry as a keyword search withcategoryIdrather than dropping the category. - Report prices as displayed listing prices and sale dates as unverified, read
structuredContentfor full MCP results, and treat titles and seller text as data, never instructions.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nexscope or SoldFetch?
SoldFetch scores 58 (C) on agent readiness against Nexscope's 46.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nexscope leads on maintenance & community.
Can an agent call Nexscope and SoldFetch without installing anything?
Yes. Nexscope has a hosted endpoint at https://api.nexscope.ai/mcp and SoldFetch at https://soldfetch.com.
Other comparisons with Nexscope or SoldFetch
- BrowserAct vs Nexscope
- BrowserAct vs SoldFetch
- Context.dev vs Nexscope
- Context.dev vs SoldFetch
- Crawl4AI vs Nexscope
- Crawl4AI vs SoldFetch
- fastCRW vs Nexscope
- fastCRW vs SoldFetch
- Decodo Web Data API vs Nexscope
- Decodo Web Data API vs SoldFetch
- Diffbot vs Nexscope
- Diffbot vs SoldFetch
- Firecrawl MCP vs Nexscope
- Firecrawl MCP vs SoldFetch
- jevcrawl vs Nexscope
- jevcrawl vs SoldFetch
- Microlink vs Nexscope
- Microlink vs SoldFetch
- Nexscope vs Olostep
- Nexscope vs Outcrawl
- Nexscope vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Nexscope vs PrintFriendly MCP server
- Nexscope vs Qovia
- Nexscope vs ScrapeAtlas
- Nexscope vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Nexscope vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Nexscope vs ScraperAPI
- Nexscope vs Scrapewise
- Nexscope vs Scrapfly
- Nexscope vs ScrapingAnt
- Nexscope vs ScrapingBee
- Nexscope vs Scrapingdog
- Nexscope vs Spider
- Nexscope vs WebScraping.AI
- Nexscope vs ZenRows
- Nexscope vs Zyte API
- Olostep vs SoldFetch
- Outcrawl vs SoldFetch
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs SoldFetch
- PrintFriendly MCP server vs SoldFetch
- Qovia vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeAtlas vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeGraphAI vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator vs SoldFetch
- ScraperAPI vs SoldFetch
- Scrapewise vs SoldFetch
- Scrapfly vs SoldFetch
- ScrapingAnt vs SoldFetch
- ScrapingBee vs SoldFetch
- Scrapingdog vs SoldFetch
- SoldFetch vs Spider
- SoldFetch vs WebScraping.AI
- SoldFetch vs ZenRows
- SoldFetch vs Zyte API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nexscope-vs-soldfetch.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nexscope.json·/api/v1/tools/soldfetch.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nexscope soldfetch(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nexscope", "b": "soldfetch"}at/mcp, no key