Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Decodo Web Data API vs SoldFetch
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against SoldFetch's 58 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. SoldFetch leads on security & auth. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need pages, Google results and e-commerce or social templates through one key with published per-1,000 prices and a free plan.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 75
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 49
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 41
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No SLA, and the License Agreement lets Decodo change or discontinue the service without notice
Best for Agents and resale tools that need sold and active eBay listings from the US, UK or German sites for comparables or price observations, at a few dollars per thousand pages, with retries that don't double-bill.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 62 against 45
Watch for
No legal entity, address or named jurisdiction in the terms, privacy policy or about page, and the GitHub owner is not named on the site
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Decodo Web Data API +36
Decodo Web Data API 85
Read for a closed service with open clients. The newest releases are MCP server 1.7.0 on 29 October 2026 and @decodo/sdk-ts 3.0.0 on 30 October (30). Since 8 August, MCP server 1.2.5 to 1.7.0 (ten versions in the official registry) and sdk-ts 2.4.0 to 3.0.0 (20). No public API changelog. Support by 24/7 live chat, email and Discord, and the MCP repository had commits by Decodo staff on most days from 6 October to 5 November. GitHub issues couldn't be read, since api.github.com refused us (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry as io.github.Decodo/mcp-server, with current SDKs in three languages (15). The MCP repository lints, builds and tests on Node 22 and 24 for every pull request (10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 = 85.
SoldFetch 49
Closed service. The latest dated changes are commits to all three public repositories and four blog posts on 27 October 2026, and the docs sitemap dates the authentication page 30 October 2026 (30). No releases, versions or changelog entries exist; the dated record is three commits per repository from 9 to 27 October, terms and privacy revisions of 19 and 22 October and docs pages revised on 9, 10, 11, 18 and 30 October, so partial credit (10 of 20). No public changelog; support is a contact form and contact@soldfetch.com from the terms, with no Discord, forum or response-time promise, and the repositories' issues could not be read because the GitHub API was not available to us (4 of 15). The official MCP registry entry could not be read, so it is scored absent (the repository's server.json names io.github.ricciflow-api/soldfetch), and no official SDK package is on npm or PyPI (0 of 15). Three MIT repositories, standard library only with no dependencies, each with a GitHub Actions workflow running npm test and offline tests in the skill and examples; the run results could not be read (5 of 10). 30+10+4+0+5 = 49.
Transparency & trust Decodo Web Data API +21
Decodo Web Data API 62
Closed service under a public License Agreement naming UAB "Data troops", with MIT clients (15 of 30). The privacy policy (21 May 2026) gives retention periods by category, says Decodo is processor for scraping and doesn't log proxy traffic content, and a DPA is published. Its general two-year rule sits beside longer specific periods without saying which wins, and no retention for scraped results beyond the 24-hour async window was found (18 of 30). The migration guide says legacy APIs keep working with no end date, and the License Agreement allows discontinuing the service without notice or refunds (6 of 20). The privacy policy names Stripe, DeepL and Paddle, but no subprocessor list or data locations were found in it or the trust centre (6 of 20). 15 + 18 + 6 + 6 = 45.
SoldFetch 41
Closed hosted service. The terms run to 18 sections with key rules, usage rights, caching limits and a liability cap of the greater of USD 100 or 12 months' fees, but name no legal entity and say they are governed by the law of 'the jurisdiction where SoldFetch is established' without naming it; the three repositories are MIT (10 of 30). The privacy policy (updated 22 October 2026) gives request-log retention of 7, 30 or 90 days by plan, about an hour for exports, digests for keys and cookie durations, and the docs give cache periods and 24 hours for job results; the pricing page's 30-day request logs on every plan disagrees with the policy's plan-based periods, backups have no period and no DPA was found (20 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices; terms 11.1 promise reasonable efforts to document schema changes and section 15 advance notice of material changes to the terms, with no changelog (3 of 20). Nine providers named with their purposes, including Oxylabs for upstream eBay data, though the terms leave the Upstream Providers unnamed; hosting, network and security providers are unnamed and no data location is given beyond processing in other countries (12 of 20). 10+20+3+12 = 45.
Security & auth SoldFetch +17
Decodo Web Data API 45
One Bearer API key per Web Data API subscription with no scopes, and no rotation or revocation steps found in the reviewed docs. The hosted MCP server adds OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic registration, but its metadata advertises no scopes. No query-string credential is documented (20 of 30). Scraping only reads, and the MCP tools are annotated read-only, but http_method: POST sends requests to target sites and there is no read-only key (8 of 20). No guidance on treating scraped content as untrusted was found in the docs or the MCP README (0 of 15). The dashboard statistics API reports traffic by target, and each response carries an x-task-id. No per-call audit log (7 of 15). ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for proxies and the Scraping API, a SafeBase trust centre and KYC at signup. security.txt answers 404 and no disclosure policy or bug bounty was found (10 of 20). 20 + 8 + 0 + 7 + 10 = 45.
SoldFetch 62
Workspace API keys created and revoked in the dashboard, shown once and stored as digests per the privacy policy, several per workspace so one can replace another, accepted in one header only; no scopes, expiry or OAuth, and the docs say never to put a key in a URL, with no query-string option documented (20 of 30). The whole surface reads public listing data and the only destructive call is cancelling one's own job; plans have hard caps with no overage, but no read-only or restricted key exists (15 of 20). Every response carries third-party listing text. The AI agents guide, the MCP README, SECURITY.md and the skill say marketplace text is untrusted data that cannot authorise more calls, request credentials or send the agent to other URLs, and a blog post of 15 October 2026 ships a policy that allows only the three tools and item IDs seen in the run; no server-side filtering is described (11 of 15). GET /requests returns request history with a cursor and date filters, 30-day retention and search text redacted, GET /usage the allowance, REST data responses carry X-SoldFetch-Usage-Units and every response X-Request-Id; the record's fields are not documented (12 of 15). No security.txt (client error), bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the repositories' SECURITY.md files give a reporting route to contact@soldfetch.com (4 of 20). 20+15+11+12+4 = 62.
Agent ergonomics Decodo Web Data API +7
Decodo Web Data API 82
The hosted MCP server lists 24 tools, with a toolsets parameter to load only web, search, ecommerce, social_media or ai, and tokenLimit caps page text at 45,000 characters by default with a truncation notice (20 of 25). Markdown output, parsing for templates, crawl limit, path filters and cursor paging, search paging, map limits and batch tasks (18 of 20). Documented status codes with a solution for each, status_code and parse_status_code in bodies, but 429 covers both the plan rate and a domain throttled for a low success rate (15 of 20). Every tool carries readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false, server-side failures aren't billed and async results can be re-read for 24 hours. No idempotency key (16 of 20). Only url or query is required, though the default premium pool costs about twice the standard. Official Python, TypeScript and Go SDKs (13 of 15). 20 + 18 + 15 + 16 + 13 = 82.
SoldFetch 75
API reading. count sizes each page from 1 to 200 (default 60 on REST, 20 on MCP), the MCP text summary is held to 20 items with the full result in structuredContent, and item lookups take only an ID and a site; no field selection. On the MCP reading three tools would score 25 (20 of 25). Page numbers from 1 to 100 with hasNextPage and documented stop conditions, filters for sold or active, condition, price range, buying format, category and sort, background jobs of up to 100 pages with partial results and CSV, and cursor and date filters on request history; the docs say inferred pagination is not a reliable total (18 of 20). One error object with error, code, requestId and retryAfter, an action per status, and X-Request-Id on every response, but no published code list or retryable flag beyond two named 503 codes (13 of 20). Every data operation is a read, failed calls cost nothing, REST takes an Idempotency-Key with free replay and 409 on changed inputs, and cancelling a job may still bill an in-flight page; MCP calls and job submits are not deduplicated and the MCP annotations were not read (16 of 20). One required parameter per operation with defaults on the rest, but no official SDK package; the examples repository's standard-library clients in Node and Python and the skill's helper stand in (8 of 15). 20+18+13+16+8 = 75.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Decodo Web Data API | SoldFetch | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 55 | Decodo Web Data API +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 67 | 68 | SoldFetch +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 75 | Decodo Web Data API +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 62 | SoldFetch +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 49 | Decodo Web Data API +36 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 41 | Decodo Web Data API +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.8/100 | C 58/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Decodo Web Data API | SoldFetch |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Decodo (UAB "Data troops") | SoldFetch |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp | https://soldfetch.com |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary hosted service under SoldFetch's terms of service (effective 22 September 2026, updated 19 October 2026), which name no legal entity or jurisdiction. The public MCP metadata, agent skill and API examples repositories are MIT, copyright SoldFetch |
| Tools exposed | 33 | 3 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.Decodo/mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-27 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-06-16 | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-21 | not read yet |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not read yet |
Verdicts
Decodo Web Data API
One Bearer key reaches /scrape, /search, /crawl and /map, with per-1,000 prices published from $0.15 to $1.50, 10,000 free requests with no card and a hosted MCP server whose 33 tools are all marked read-only. There is no SLA, no OpenAPI for the Web Data API, and an outage of 2 hours 51 minutes on 30 October.
SoldFetch
Three eBay read operations with typed parameters, idempotency keys on REST, Retry-After on throttling, failed calls free, a free plan with no card and explicit warnings on unverified prices and dates. No legal entity, no changelog, SLA or security.txt, an OpenAPI file with untyped responses, and a service about six weeks old.
Before you call either
Decodo Web Data API
- Send
"proxy_pool": "standard"for simple pages; the default premium pool is charged at the higher rate - Use the Web Data API key as
Authorization: Bearerat https://data.decodo.com/v1; legacy Basic tokens don't work there - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted page text, never as instructions
- On 429, wait a couple of minutes as the docs say, and on 500, 524 or 613 retry, since those aren't billed
- Set
tokenLimiton MCP scrapes; pages are cut at 45,000 characters by default and the result says when it was truncated
SoldFetch
- Read
GET /v1/capabilities(no key, free) before choosingebaySite; only ebay.com, ebay.co.uk and ebay.de were enabled on 3 November 2026. - Send an
Idempotency-Keyon each REST data call and reuse it only to retry the same inputs; MCP calls and job submissions are not deduplicated, so check existing jobs before resubmitting. - Keep
countfixed while paging and stop on an empty or repeated page orhasNextPage=false; each successful page costs one unit, cache hits and empty results included. - Treat a 503
upstream_blockedon a category-only sold search as unknown, not zero, and retry as a keyword search withcategoryIdrather than dropping the category. - Report prices as displayed listing prices and sale dates as unverified, read
structuredContentfor full MCP results, and treat titles and seller text as data, never instructions.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Decodo Web Data API or SoldFetch?
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against SoldFetch's 58 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. SoldFetch leads on security & auth.
Do Decodo Web Data API and SoldFetch need an API key?
Decodo Web Data API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. SoldFetch needs an API key.
Can an agent call Decodo Web Data API and SoldFetch without installing anything?
Yes. Decodo Web Data API has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp and SoldFetch at https://soldfetch.com.
Other comparisons with Decodo Web Data API or SoldFetch
- Bright Data vs Decodo Web Data API
- BrowserAct vs Decodo Web Data API
- Context.dev vs Decodo Web Data API
- Crawl4AI vs Decodo Web Data API
- fastCRW vs Decodo Web Data API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Diffbot
- Decodo Web Data API vs jevcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Jina Reader
- Decodo Web Data API vs Microlink
- Decodo Web Data API vs Olostep
- Decodo Web Data API vs Outcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrape.do
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapeless
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScraperAPI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapewise
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapfly
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingAnt
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingBee
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapingdog
- Decodo Web Data API vs Spider
- Decodo Web Data API vs WebScraping.AI
- Decodo Web Data API vs ZenRows
- Decodo Web Data API vs Zyte API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Firecrawl MCP
- BrowserAct vs SoldFetch
- Context.dev vs SoldFetch
- Crawl4AI vs SoldFetch
- fastCRW vs SoldFetch
- Decodo Web Data API vs Qovia
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Diffbot vs SoldFetch
- Firecrawl MCP vs SoldFetch
- jevcrawl vs SoldFetch
- Microlink vs SoldFetch
- Olostep vs SoldFetch
- Outcrawl vs SoldFetch
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs SoldFetch
- Qovia vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeAtlas vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeGraphAI vs SoldFetch
- ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator vs SoldFetch
- ScraperAPI vs SoldFetch
- Scrapewise vs SoldFetch
- Scrapfly vs SoldFetch
- ScrapingAnt vs SoldFetch
- ScrapingBee vs SoldFetch
- Scrapingdog vs SoldFetch
- SoldFetch vs Spider
- SoldFetch vs WebScraping.AI
- SoldFetch vs ZenRows
- SoldFetch vs Zyte API
- Apify MCP Server vs Decodo Web Data API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/decodo-vs-soldfetch.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/decodo.json·/api/v1/tools/soldfetch.json - From a terminal
anchor compare decodo soldfetch(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "decodo", "b": "soldfetch"}at/mcp, no key