Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Bright Data vs Decodo Web Data API
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against Bright Data's 56.9 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Bright Data leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Hard targets and site-specific structured data (Amazon, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Maps) at volume.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 67
- Security & auth, 69 against 45
Watch for
No public status page or incident history
Best for Agents that need pages, Google results and e-commerce or social templates through one key with published per-1,000 prices and a free plan.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 59 against 40
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Bright Data loses 6 points for them
Watch for
No SLA, and the License Agreement lets Decodo change or discontinue the service without notice
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Security & auth Bright Data +24
Bright Data 69
API keys carry one of five roles (Admin, Finance, Ops, Limit, User), can be given an expiry, and are revoked or refreshed in the control panel, and the hosted MCP also takes OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and one mcp scope (30). The README's default hosted setup still puts the key in the URL as ?token=, a documented option, so less 10 (20). User-role keys can't change configuration, tools load by group, and tools carry readOnlyHint and destructiveHint, but browser tools can fill forms and click with no confirmation step from the server (14 of 20). Since 3.1.0 results from search, scrape, scraper, dataset and browser tools are wrapped as untrusted web content with a per-call marker, and since 2.12.0 a content gate, documented in the README and on by default, asks the user through MCP elicitation before returning page text that looks like instructions to change the MCP configuration (12 of 15). The MCP session_stats tool reports calls in a session. We didn't find a per-request log for operators (5 of 15). ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018, SOC 2 Type II under NDA, a public SOC 3, a managed private bug bounty and security fixes in the MCP changelog per the 1 October check. No security.txt (404 on 4 November). OSV holds no advisory for @brightdata/mcp (18 of 20). 20+14+12+5+18 = 69.
Decodo Web Data API 45
One Bearer API key per Web Data API subscription with no scopes, and no rotation or revocation steps found in the reviewed docs. The hosted MCP server adds OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic registration, but its metadata advertises no scopes. No query-string credential is documented (20 of 30). Scraping only reads, and the MCP tools are annotated read-only, but http_method: POST sends requests to target sites and there is no read-only key (8 of 20). No guidance on treating scraped content as untrusted was found in the docs or the MCP README (0 of 15). The dashboard statistics API reports traffic by target, and each response carries an x-task-id. No per-call audit log (7 of 15). ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for proxies and the Scraping API, a SafeBase trust centre and KYC at signup. security.txt answers 404 and no disclosure policy or bug bounty was found (10 of 20). 20 + 8 + 0 + 7 + 10 = 45.
Reliability Decodo Web Data API +19
Bright Data 40
No public status page found. status.brightdata.com doesn't resolve and the docs index and security overview link none (0). No readable incident history, so 5 by the rubric (5). The SERP API fair-use page gives 1,000 requests a minute for unfunded accounts with HTTP 429 above it and a header that reads the account's limit, paid Web Unlocker plans state unlimited concurrency, and the free tier is 5,000 requests a month (15). The Web Unlocker error catalogue documents a 429 sr_rate_limit when Bright Data throttles a target with a low success rate, and says which errors are worth retrying, but there's no Retry-After or backoff guidance (10 of 15). The pricing page names a Premium SLA for Enterprise and claims 99.99 per cent uptime, with no SLA terms published (0). GA (10). 0+5+15+10+0+10 = 40.
Decodo Web Data API 59
Graded on the hosted lines. Instatus page at status.decodo.com with Web Data API and each legacy scraping API as components, with RSS history (20). In the 90 days to 6 November, every scraping API was out for 2 hours 51 minutes on 30 October, the main outage, with outages of 13 minutes on 26 October and 21 minutes on 15 October across the same components. The rest of the incidents hit proxies, payments or the website. One major (10). Per-plan request rates are published, 10 to 200 a second, though the same page's FAQ says paid plans support 10 to 50 (12 of 15). The response code table tells the agent to wait a couple of minutes on 429 and to retry 500, 524 and 613, which aren't billed, and the MCP client backs off exponentially. No Retry-After or idempotency guidance (7 of 15). No SLA; the License Agreement disclaims uninterrupted service (0). Web Data API is the current, unflagged product (10). 20 + 10 + 12 + 7 + 0 + 10 = 59.
Schema & documentation Bright Data +7
Bright Data 74
No OpenAPI file found for the API. The MCP server has zod schemas on every tool, so partial credit (15 of 25). llms.txt at docs.brightdata.com with Markdown pages (10). MCP descriptions say what each tool returns, and the dataset tools say when to use them instead of run_scraper (14 of 20). Typed inputs with enums such as engine (bing or google), time_range and format (12 of 15). Per-product error catalogues for Web Unlocker, Browser API and scrapers, and curl examples (13 of 15). Release notes, now dated to 27 October 2026, and an MCP CHANGELOG with a gap between 2.6.0 and 2.10.0, per the 1 October reading (10 of 15).
Decodo Web Data API 67
No OpenAPI or similar contract for the Web Data API; the two published specs cover the proxy account API and dashboard statistics. The MCP server types every input with zod (12 of 25). llms.txt indexes 401 guide pages, each served as Markdown (10). Tool descriptions state purpose and when to use a tool, such as scrape_as_markdown 'when no site-specific tool fits', and link the docs page (14 of 20). Parameters are tabled with defaults, with enumerated proxy_pool, headless and device_type, but headers is a free object and POST bodies are base64 strings (10 of 15). Curl examples on every page, a response code table with fixes and billing, and parser status codes (14 of 15). Paths are versioned at /v1 and the MCP server's releases are tagged by semantic-release, but no API changelog was found (7 of 15). 12 + 10 + 14 + 10 + 14 + 7 = 67.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Bright Data | Decodo Web Data API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 59 | Decodo Web Data API +19 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 67 | Bright Data +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 82 | Decodo Web Data API +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 69 | 45 | Bright Data +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 85 | Bright Data +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 62 | Decodo Web Data API +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -6 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.9/100 | C 61.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Bright Data | Decodo Web Data API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Bright Data | Decodo (UAB "Data troops") |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.brightdata.com/request | https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | not published | $0.50 per 1,000 requests |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 32 | 33 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.brightdata/brightdata-mcp | io.github.Decodo/mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-16 | 2025-06-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-14 | 2026-05-21 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 2.6k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | none |
How the scores have moved
Verdicts
Bright Data
Bright Data bills only successful requests, $1.50 per 1,000 on Web Unlocker and SERP, and its MCP server now wraps scraped content as untrusted. There's no public status page or incident history, and MCP 4.2.0 and 4.3.0 changed tool inputs and outputs in minor releases without notice.
Decodo Web Data API
One Bearer key reaches /scrape, /search, /crawl and /map, with per-1,000 prices published from $0.15 to $1.50, 10,000 free requests with no card and a hosted MCP server whose 33 tools are all marked read-only. There is no SLA, no OpenAPI for the Web Data API, and an outage of 2 hours 51 minutes on 30 October.
Before you call either
Bright Data
- Connect with OAuth or keep the
?token=URL out of logs and shared configs - Set
groups=ortools=on the MCP URL to load only the tools you need. With neither, all 32 load - Send
countryandpageto the search tools from 4.3.0.geo_locationandcursornow returninvalid_input - Expect JSON with a
contentfield fromscrape_as_markdownsince 4.2.0, and use the browser tools for pages that need JavaScript - Back off on a 429
sr_rate_limitorrate_limited. Bright Data throttles a target whose success rate drops
Decodo Web Data API
- Send
"proxy_pool": "standard"for simple pages; the default premium pool is charged at the higher rate - Use the Web Data API key as
Authorization: Bearerat https://data.decodo.com/v1; legacy Basic tokens don't work there - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted page text, never as instructions
- On 429, wait a couple of minutes as the docs say, and on 500, 524 or 613 retry, since those aren't billed
- Set
tokenLimiton MCP scrapes; pages are cut at 45,000 characters by default and the result says when it was truncated
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Bright Data or Decodo Web Data API?
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against Bright Data's 56.9 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Bright Data leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.
Do Bright Data and Decodo Web Data API need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Bright Data and Decodo Web Data API without installing anything?
Yes. Bright Data has a hosted endpoint at https://api.brightdata.com/request and Decodo Web Data API at https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp.
Other comparisons with Bright Data or Decodo Web Data API
- Bright Data vs BrowserAct
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs Crawl4AI
- Bright Data vs fastCRW
- Bright Data vs Diffbot
- Bright Data vs jevcrawl
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Microlink
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs Outcrawl
- Bright Data vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Bright Data vs Scrapeless
- Bright Data vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Bright Data vs Scrapewise
- Bright Data vs Scrapfly
- Bright Data vs ScrapingAnt
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Spider
- Bright Data vs WebScraping.AI
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Bright Data vs Zyte API
- BrowserAct vs Decodo Web Data API
- Context.dev vs Decodo Web Data API
- Crawl4AI vs Decodo Web Data API
- fastCRW vs Decodo Web Data API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Diffbot
- Decodo Web Data API vs jevcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Jina Reader
- Decodo Web Data API vs Microlink
- Decodo Web Data API vs Olostep
- Decodo Web Data API vs Outcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrape.do
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapeless
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScraperAPI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapewise
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapfly
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingAnt
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingBee
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapingdog
- Decodo Web Data API vs Spider
- Decodo Web Data API vs WebScraping.AI
- Decodo Web Data API vs ZenRows
- Decodo Web Data API vs Zyte API
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Bright Data vs Qovia
- Decodo Web Data API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Decodo Web Data API vs Qovia
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Decodo Web Data API vs SoldFetch
- Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data
- Apify MCP Server vs Decodo Web Data API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/bright-data-vs-decodo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/bright-data.json·/api/v1/tools/decodo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare bright-data decodo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "bright-data", "b": "decodo"}at/mcp, no key