Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Bright Data vs Context.dev
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Bright Data's 59.8 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Hard targets and site-specific structured data (Amazon, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Maps) at volume.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No public status page or incident history
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 67 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 74
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 82
- Security & auth, 83 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 59
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Bright Data | Context.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 67 | Context.dev +32 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 96 | Context.dev +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 90 | Context.dev +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 83 | Context.dev +26 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 50 | Context.dev +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 84 | 85 | Context.dev +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 73 | Context.dev +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.8/100 | A 78.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Bright Data | Context.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Bright Data | Context Dev Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.brightdata.com/request | https://api.context.dev/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | not published | $0.79 per 1,000 pages |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 69 | 42 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.brightdata/brightdata-mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-16 | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-14 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 2.6k stars | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Bright Data
Pay only for successful requests, $1.50 per 1,000 on Web Unlocker and SERP. No public status page or incident history.
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
Before you call either
Bright Data
- Connect with OAuth or keep the
?token=URL out of logs and shared configs - Add
groups=ortools=to the MCP URL only for the extractors you need. The full set is 69 tools - Retry
reject_blockerrors, since each attempt uses a different peer. Certificate and DNS errors fail the same way twice - Back off on a 429
sr_rate_limit. Bright Data throttles a target whose success rate drops - Use the batch tools for up to 10 searches or scrapes in one call
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Bright Data or Context.dev?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against Bright Data's 59.8 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Do Bright Data and Context.dev need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Bright Data and Context.dev without installing anything?
Yes. Bright Data has a hosted endpoint at https://api.brightdata.com/request and Context.dev at https://api.context.dev/v1.
Other comparisons with Bright Data or Context.dev
- Bright Data vs Diffbot
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Bright Data vs Scrapeless
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Bright Data vs Scrapfly
- Bright Data vs ScrapingAnt
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Spider
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Bright Data vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/bright-data-vs-context-dev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/bright-data.json·/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare bright-data context-dev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "bright-data", "b": "context-dev"}at/mcp, no key