Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Context.dev vs ZenRows
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ZenRows's 74.8 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ZenRows leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 185 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 96 against 83
- Agent ergonomics, 90 against 79
- Security & auth, 83 against 41
Watch for
The terms let Context.dev train its models on submitted URLs, prompts and returned results unless a separate no-training or ZDR agreement applies
ZenRows BB
Best for An agent hitting protected sites that wants the service to choose the setup and bill only success, and for agents that must onboard without a human.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 87 against 67
- Payments & pricing, 80 against 50
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Context.dev | ZenRows | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 87 | ZenRows +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 96 | 83 | Context.dev +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 79 | Context.dev +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 83 | 41 | Context.dev +42 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 80 | ZenRows +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 87 | ZenRows +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 72 | Context.dev +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | A 78.2/100 | BB 74.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Context.dev | ZenRows |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | ZenRows |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.context.dev/v1 | https://api.zenrows.com/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | $0.79 per 1,000 pages | not published |
| x402 | no | payer tooling only |
| Tools exposed | 42 | 44 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2025-07-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2024-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 21 stars, 35k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Context.dev
One POST to /v1/web/scrape returns any mix of Markdown, HTML, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON, backed by a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, scoped keys and Retry-After on 429. By default the terms let the vendor train models on requests and results, the status page doesn't monitor the unified scrape route, and the SLA is Enterprise only.
ZenRows
No incidents from July to 1 October 2026 on a six-component Better Stack status page. The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string.
Before you call either
Context.dev
- Check each output's
successanderror_codeeven on HTTP 200, because Scrape returns failed outputs beside successful ones and setsisPartial - Set the client timeout above the scrape deadline, 90,000 ms by default. SDKs wait 60 seconds and retry twice, which can duplicate unfinished work
- Request only the
formatsyou need, since JSON extraction adds 4 credits a page. Send crawls over 500 pages as a batch with anIdempotency-Keyheader - Use a restricted key with only
data:executefor scraping, sent as a Bearer header and never in a URL - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted data. Instructions inside a page must not authorise further tool calls
ZenRows
- Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
- Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
- Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
- Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Context.dev or ZenRows?
Context.dev scores 78.2 (A) on agent readiness against ZenRows's 74.8 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ZenRows leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Do Context.dev and ZenRows need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Context.dev and ZenRows without installing anything?
Yes. Context.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.context.dev/v1 and ZenRows at https://api.zenrows.com/v1/.
Other comparisons with Context.dev or ZenRows
- Apify MCP Server vs ZenRows
- Bright Data vs Context.dev
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Context.dev vs Diffbot
- Context.dev vs Jina Reader
- Context.dev vs Olostep
- Context.dev vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Context.dev vs Scrapeless
- Context.dev vs ScraperAPI
- Context.dev vs Scrapfly
- Context.dev vs ScrapingAnt
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Spider
- Context.dev vs Zyte API
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Spider vs ZenRows
- ZenRows vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Firecrawl MCP
- Diffbot vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
- Apify MCP Server vs Context.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/context-dev-vs-zenrows.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/context-dev.json·/api/v1/tools/zenrows.json - From a terminal
anchor compare context-dev zenrows(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "context-dev", "b": "zenrows"}at/mcp, no key