Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrapfly vs ZenRows
ZenRows has a score of 75.1 (BB) against Scrapfly's 69.8 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points.
ScrapflyScrapfly (Joam Intelligence, LLC) · HTTP API
B69.8/100#107 of 452
ZenRowsZenRows · HTTP API
BB75.1/100#43 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Scrapfly for
- schema & documentation (+12)
- security & auth (+29)
Pick ZenRows for
- reliability (+37)
- payments & pricing (+40)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrapfly | ZenRows | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 87 | ZenRows +37 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 95 | 83 | Scrapfly +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 79 | Scrapfly +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 70 | 41 | Scrapfly +29 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 80 | ZenRows +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 84 | 87 | ZenRows +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 75 | Scrapfly +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.8 · B | 75.1 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrapfly | ZenRows |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrapfly (Joam Intelligence, LLC) | ZenRows |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrapfly.io/scrape | https://api.zenrows.com/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | payer tooling only |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 61 | 44 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.scrapfly.mcp/mcp | io.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-18 |
| Popularity | 14 stars, 21k npm/wk | 21 stars, 35k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Before you call either
Scrapfly
- Send
X-Scrapfly-Api-Keyas a header rather thankey=so the key stays out of logs - Pass
unblocker=falseto the MCP web_scrape tool for plain pages, since it's on when omitted.aspis the deprecated alias - Set
cost_budgeton each scrape so an Unblocker upgrade can't blow through credits - Check
retryablein the error body before retrying, and stop onERR::THROTTLE::MAX_API_CREDIT_BUDGET_EXCEEDED - Use web_get_page for a simple fetch and save cloud_browser_open for pages that need clicks
ZenRows
- Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
- Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
- Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
- Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account
Other comparisons with Scrapfly or ZenRows
- Bright Data vs Scrapfly
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapfly
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Scrapeless vs Scrapfly
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Spider
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Spider vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapfly
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/scrapfly.json·/api/v1/tools/zenrows.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/scrapfly-vs-zenrows.md