Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs ZenRows
ZenRows has a score of 75.1 (BB) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 29 points.
OlostepOlostep Technologies, Inc. · HTTP API
B63.1/100#210 of 452
ZenRowsZenRows · HTTP API
BB75.1/100#43 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Olostep for
- agent ergonomics (+8)
Pick ZenRows for
- reliability (+27)
- security & auth (+13)
- payments & pricing (+15)
- maintenance & community (+29)
- transparency & trust (+15)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | ZenRows | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 87 | ZenRows +27 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 83 | Olostep +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 79 | Olostep +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 41 | ZenRows +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 80 | ZenRows +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 87 | ZenRows +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 75 | ZenRows +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 75.1 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | ZenRows |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | ZenRows |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://api.zenrows.com/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | payer tooling only | payer tooling only |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 44 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | io.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 21 stars, 35k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
ZenRows
- Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
- Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
- Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
- Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account
Other comparisons with Olostep or ZenRows
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Spider vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/zenrows.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/olostep-vs-zenrows.md