Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs ScraperAPI
Olostep scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 167 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Olostep B
Good for Bulk scraping on a budget and for batch jobs of thousands of URLs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 67
- Agent ergonomics, 87 against 74
- Payments & pricing, 65 against 40
Watch for
The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe
Good for Agents that want a single GET to fetch pages through proxies, with parsed JSON for Amazon, Google, Walmart, eBay and Redfin and a batch API of up to 50,000 URLs.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No status page is linked from the home, pricing, support or docs pages, although the pricing page lists a 99.9% uptime guarantee
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | ScraperAPI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 45 | Olostep +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 67 | Olostep +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 74 | Olostep +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 29 | ScraperAPI +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 40 | Olostep +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 61 | ScraperAPI +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 54 | Olostep +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63 · B | 52.1 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | ScraperAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | ScraperAPI (saas.group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://api.scraperapi.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | $0.495 per 1,000 requests | not published |
| x402 | payer tooling only | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 28 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-08-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-07-15 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-07-15 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 5 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Olostep
OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.
ScraperAPI
One GET request with a key and a URL returns a page, and the MCP server's 28 tools carry read-only and destructive hints. No status page, OpenAPI file, security.txt or certification was found, and the documented default puts the API key in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
ScraperAPI
- Set the client timeout to 70 seconds. The API retries for that long before it returns 500, and a request cancelled earlier is still charged
- Send the key as the
x-sapi-api_keyheader to keep it out of URLs and logs - Pass
max_coston each request, or call/account/urlcostfirst, because domain and anti-bot surcharges vary from 1 to 75 credits - Use
output_format=markdownortextto cut response size, andautoparse=trueonly on supported domains - On 429 reduce concurrency to the plan limit (5 on Free, 20 on Hobby). The request is rejected, not queued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Olostep or ScraperAPI?
Olostep scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against ScraperAPI's 52.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Do Olostep and ScraperAPI need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Olostep and ScraperAPI without installing anything?
Yes. Olostep has a hosted endpoint at https://api.olostep.com and ScraperAPI at https://api.scraperapi.com.
Other comparisons with Olostep or ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs ScraperAPI
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ScraperAPI
- Olostep vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Zyte API
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScraperAPI
- Scrapeless vs ScraperAPI
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapfly
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingAnt
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Spider
- ScraperAPI vs ZenRows
- ScraperAPI vs Zyte API
- Diffbot vs Olostep
- Diffbot vs ScraperAPI
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScraperAPI
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs ScraperAPI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/olostep-vs-scraperapi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/scraperapi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare olostep scraperapi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "olostep", "b": "scraperapi"}at/mcp, no key