Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Jina Reader vs Olostep
Olostep has a score of 63.1 (B) against Jina Reader's 45.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 41 points.
Jina ReaderJina AI (Elastic) · HTTP API
E45.3/100#402 of 452
OlostepOlostep Technologies, Inc. · HTTP API
B63.1/100#210 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Jina Reader for
- maintenance & community (+7)
Pick Olostep for
- schema & documentation (+41)
- agent ergonomics (+11)
- payments & pricing (+30)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Jina Reader | Olostep | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 43 | 84 | Olostep +41 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 87 | Olostep +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 32 | 28 | Jina Reader +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 65 | Olostep +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 58 | Jina Reader +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 60 | Jina Reader +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | 0 | |
| Total | 45.3 · E | 63.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Jina Reader | Olostep |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Jina AI (Elastic) | Olostep Technologies, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://r.jina.ai/ | https://api.olostep.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | payer tooling only |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 11 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-15 |
| Popularity | 12k stars | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Jina Reader
One URL prefix, no key needed, Markdown back. No price per token in any currency on the public page.
Olostep
OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.
Before you call either
Jina Reader
- Prefix the URL,
https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com, and read the Markdown - Send
x-max-tokensto cap a page, orx-token-budgetto refuse one that's too big - Use
x-target-selectorwhen you need one part of a page - Keyless is 20 requests a minute and can't search. Add a key for loops or s.jina.ai
- Send
x-no-cache: truewhen a page may have changed or a blocked response got cached
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
Other comparisons with Jina Reader or Olostep
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapeless
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/jina-reader.json·/api/v1/tools/olostep.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/jina-reader-vs-olostep.md