Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 32 points.
Jina ReaderJina AI (Elastic) · HTTP API
E45.3/100#402 of 452
ScrapingdogScrapingdog (OpenData Labs) · HTTP API
E39.3/100#425 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Jina Reader for
- agent ergonomics (+32)
- security & auth (+27)
- maintenance & community (+20)
Pick Scrapingdog for
- payments & pricing (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Jina Reader | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 62 | Scrapingdog +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 43 | 43 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 44 | Jina Reader +32 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 32 | 5 | Jina Reader +27 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Scrapingdog +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 45 | Jina Reader +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 57 | Jina Reader +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | -2 | |
| Total | 45.3 · E | 39.3 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Jina Reader | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Jina AI (Elastic) | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://r.jina.ai/ | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 35 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-31 |
| Popularity | 12k stars | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Jina Reader
One URL prefix, no key needed, Markdown back. No price per token in any currency on the public page.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Jina Reader
- Prefix the URL,
https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com, and read the Markdown - Send
x-max-tokensto cap a page, orx-token-budgetto refuse one that's too big - Use
x-target-selectorwhen you need one part of a page - Keyless is 20 requests a minute and can't search. Add a key for loops or s.jina.ai
- Send
x-no-cache: truewhen a page may have changed or a blocked response got cached
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Other comparisons with Jina Reader or Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Jina Reader
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Jina Reader vs Scrapeless
- Jina Reader vs Scrapfly
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Spider
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/jina-reader.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog.md