Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapingdog
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 501 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need pages, Google results and e-commerce or social templates through one key with published per-1,000 prices and a free plan.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 67 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 44
- Security & auth, 45 against 5
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 45
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 56
Watch for
No SLA, and the License Agreement lets Decodo change or discontinue the service without notice
Best for A budget agent that wants parsed Google, Amazon or LinkedIn results and can keep the key out of logs.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
API key only travels in the URL query string
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Security & auth Decodo Web Data API +40
Decodo Web Data API 45
One Bearer API key per Web Data API subscription with no scopes, and no rotation or revocation steps found in the reviewed docs. The hosted MCP server adds OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic registration, but its metadata advertises no scopes. No query-string credential is documented (20 of 30). Scraping only reads, and the MCP tools are annotated read-only, but http_method: POST sends requests to target sites and there is no read-only key (8 of 20). No guidance on treating scraped content as untrusted was found in the docs or the MCP README (0 of 15). The dashboard statistics API reports traffic by target, and each response carries an x-task-id. No per-call audit log (7 of 15). ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for proxies and the Scraping API, a SafeBase trust centre and KYC at signup. security.txt answers 404 and no disclosure policy or bug bounty was found (10 of 20). 20 + 8 + 0 + 7 + 10 = 45.
Scrapingdog 5
One account key with no scopes, and we found no rotation or revocation docs (10). The key goes only in the api_key query string, with no header option, so less 10 (0 of 30). No read-only mode or least-privilege key. The API only reads third-party pages, so there are no destructive account actions (5 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance in the docs or the MCP README (0 of 15). No request log or per-call audit found (0 of 15). No security.txt per the 30 September check, and no disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (0 of 20).
Maintenance & community Decodo Web Data API +40
Decodo Web Data API 85
Read for a closed service with open clients. The newest releases are MCP server 1.7.0 on 29 October 2026 and @decodo/sdk-ts 3.0.0 on 30 October (30). Since 8 August, MCP server 1.2.5 to 1.7.0 (ten versions in the official registry) and sdk-ts 2.4.0 to 3.0.0 (20). No public API changelog. Support by 24/7 live chat, email and Discord, and the MCP repository had commits by Decodo staff on most days from 6 October to 5 November. GitHub issues couldn't be read, since api.github.com refused us (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry as io.github.Decodo/mcp-server, with current SDKs in three languages (15). The MCP repository lints, builds and tests on Node 22 and 24 for every pull request (10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 = 85.
Scrapingdog 45
The SDKs and MCP server were first published on 31 July and 1 August 2026, 61 days ago. No API changelog or later release found (20). Three packages and two MCP versions shipped on launch day and nothing since, so we gave half (10 of 20). We couldn't read GitHub issues. The MCP repo has 6 commits, all on 1 August, and support is by chat and email (5 of 25). The MCP is in the official registry under the personal namespace io.github.Darshan972, though the vendor's SDK page links it as its own. SDKs are current (8 of 15). No CI, tests or tags in the MCP repo (2 of 10).
Agent ergonomics Decodo Web Data API +38
Decodo Web Data API 82
The hosted MCP server lists 24 tools, with a toolsets parameter to load only web, search, ecommerce, social_media or ai, and tokenLimit caps page text at 45,000 characters by default with a truncation notice (20 of 25). Markdown output, parsing for templates, crawl limit, path filters and cursor paging, search paging, map limits and batch tasks (18 of 20). Documented status codes with a solution for each, status_code and parse_status_code in bodies, but 429 covers both the plan rate and a domain throttled for a low success rate (15 of 20). Every tool carries readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false, server-side failures aren't billed and async results can be re-read for 24 hours. No idempotency key (16 of 20). Only url or query is required, though the default premium pool costs about twice the standard. Official Python, TypeScript and Go SDKs (13 of 15). 20 + 18 + 15 + 16 + 13 = 82.
Scrapingdog 44
35 MCP tools with no toolsets or subsets (5 of 25). markdown=true, ai_query and parsed JSON endpoints for Google, Amazon and LinkedIn keep responses smaller. No documented pagination or size limits on the raw scrape (12 of 20). 8 HTTP status codes with meanings, and the MCP passes the status and body back (12 of 20). Failed requests aren't billed, but no tool annotations or idempotency guidance (5 of 20). Only url is required, but rendering defaults on at 5 credits and the MCP describes it as off. Node and Python SDKs (10 of 15).
Schema & documentation Decodo Web Data API +24
Decodo Web Data API 67
No OpenAPI or similar contract for the Web Data API; the two published specs cover the proxy account API and dashboard statistics. The MCP server types every input with zod (12 of 25). llms.txt indexes 401 guide pages, each served as Markdown (10). Tool descriptions state purpose and when to use a tool, such as scrape_as_markdown 'when no site-specific tool fits', and link the docs page (14 of 20). Parameters are tabled with defaults, with enumerated proxy_pool, headless and device_type, but headers is a free object and POST bodies are base64 strings (10 of 15). Curl examples on every page, a response code table with fixes and billing, and parser status codes (14 of 15). Paths are versioned at /v1 and the MCP server's releases are tagged by semantic-release, but no API changelog was found (7 of 15). 12 + 10 + 14 + 10 + 14 + 7 = 67.
Scrapingdog 43
No OpenAPI spec found. The MCP builds typed zod inputs for 35 tools from a declarative registry, and ai_extract_rules is a JSON string (12 of 25). llms.txt per the 30 September check (10). MCP descriptions say what each endpoint does but not when to avoid it, and the web_scrape tool tells the model the API default for dynamic is false while the docs say rendering is on by default (10 of 20). Booleans, numbers and strings with few enums, plus the JSON-string field (9 of 15). Code examples on each docs page and 8 documented status codes (12 of 15). No changelog and no versioned API paths found (0).
Transparency & trust Decodo Web Data API +6
Decodo Web Data API 62
Closed service under a public License Agreement naming UAB "Data troops", with MIT clients (15 of 30). The privacy policy (21 May 2026) gives retention periods by category, says Decodo is processor for scraping and doesn't log proxy traffic content, and a DPA is published. Its general two-year rule sits beside longer specific periods without saying which wins, and no retention for scraped results beyond the 24-hour async window was found (18 of 30). The migration guide says legacy APIs keep working with no end date, and the License Agreement allows discontinuing the service without notice or refunds (6 of 20). The privacy policy names Stripe, DeepL and Paddle, but no subprocessor list or data locations were found in it or the trust centre (6 of 20). 15 + 18 + 6 + 6 = 45.
Scrapingdog 56
Closed service with terms revised 13 January 2026, naming OpenData Labs Private Limited under the laws of Rajasthan, India, with no postal address. The MCP is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy policy, revised 17 July 2025, says API calls are stateless and that Scrapingdog doesn't store, log or retain personal data fetched through the API. A DPA is published. No retention periods for account data (22 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). No processors or data locations named (0 of 20).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Decodo Web Data API | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 62 | Scrapingdog +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 67 | 43 | Decodo Web Data API +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 44 | Decodo Web Data API +38 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 5 | Decodo Web Data API +40 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 45 | Decodo Web Data API +40 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 56 | Decodo Web Data API +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 61.8/100 | E 39.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Decodo Web Data API | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Decodo (UAB "Data troops") | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for scraping | $0.50 per 1,000 requests | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 33 | 35 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.Decodo/mcp-server | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-06-16 | 2026-01-13 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-21 | 2025-07-17 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
How the scores have moved
Decodo Web Data API
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Decodo Web Data API
One Bearer key reaches /scrape, /search, /crawl and /map, with per-1,000 prices published from $0.15 to $1.50, 10,000 free requests with no card and a hosted MCP server whose 33 tools are all marked read-only. There is no SLA, no OpenAPI for the Web Data API, and an outage of 2 hours 51 minutes on 30 October.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Decodo Web Data API
- Send
"proxy_pool": "standard"for simple pages; the default premium pool is charged at the higher rate - Use the Web Data API key as
Authorization: Bearerat https://data.decodo.com/v1; legacy Basic tokens don't work there - Treat scraped Markdown as untrusted page text, never as instructions
- On 429, wait a couple of minutes as the docs say, and on 500, 524 or 613 retry, since those aren't billed
- Set
tokenLimiton MCP scrapes; pages are cut at 45,000 characters by default and the result says when it was truncated
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Decodo Web Data API or Scrapingdog?
Decodo Web Data API scores 61.8 (C) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Do Decodo Web Data API and Scrapingdog need an API key?
Decodo Web Data API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Scrapingdog needs an API key.
Can an agent call Decodo Web Data API and Scrapingdog without installing anything?
Yes. Decodo Web Data API has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.decodo.com/mcp and Scrapingdog at https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape.
Other comparisons with Decodo Web Data API or Scrapingdog
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Decodo Web Data API
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- BrowserAct vs Decodo Web Data API
- BrowserAct vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Decodo Web Data API
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- Crawl4AI vs Decodo Web Data API
- Crawl4AI vs Scrapingdog
- fastCRW vs Decodo Web Data API
- fastCRW vs Scrapingdog
- Decodo Web Data API vs Diffbot
- Decodo Web Data API vs jevcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Jina Reader
- Decodo Web Data API vs Microlink
- Decodo Web Data API vs Olostep
- Decodo Web Data API vs Outcrawl
- Decodo Web Data API vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrape.do
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapeless
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScraperAPI
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapewise
- Decodo Web Data API vs Scrapfly
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingAnt
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapingBee
- Decodo Web Data API vs Spider
- Decodo Web Data API vs WebScraping.AI
- Decodo Web Data API vs ZenRows
- Decodo Web Data API vs Zyte API
- jevcrawl vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Microlink vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Outcrawl vs Scrapingdog
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapewise vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs WebScraping.AI
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs Zyte API
- Decodo Web Data API vs Firecrawl MCP
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Decodo Web Data API vs Qovia
- Decodo Web Data API vs ScrapeAtlas
- Decodo Web Data API vs SoldFetch
- Diffbot vs Scrapingdog
- Qovia vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs SoldFetch
- Apify MCP Server vs Decodo Web Data API
- ScrapeOps Proxy API Aggregator vs Scrapingdog
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/decodo-vs-scrapingdog.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/decodo.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json - From a terminal
anchor compare decodo scrapingdog(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "decodo", "b": "scrapingdog"}at/mcp, no key