Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrapewise vs Scrapingdog
Scrapewise scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on reliability. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 224 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need e-commerce prices, Amazon and Google data, or recurring price monitoring with cleaning and product matching, paid per page in euros.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 44
- Security & auth, 58 against 5
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 45
Watch for
No status page, SLA, security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found
Best for A budget agent that wants parsed Google, Amazon or LinkedIn results and can keep the key out of logs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 62 against 45
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
API key only travels in the URL query string
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrapewise | Scrapingdog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 62 | Scrapingdog +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 43 | Scrapewise +36 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 86 | 44 | Scrapewise +42 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 5 | Scrapewise +53 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 45 | Scrapewise +34 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 55 | Scrapingdog +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | B 62.5/100 | E 39.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrapewise | Scrapingdog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | BEBOTECH OÜ | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp | https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 14 | 35 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | ai.scrapewise/scrapewise | io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-10-29 | 2026-01-13 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-10-29 | 2025-07-17 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1 stars, 30 PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Scrapewise
Agents get 14 priced MCP tools by default, each with a free quote_only price check and idempotency keys, read-only or full-access keys, and public euro prices from €0.15 per 1,000 plain pages. There is no status page, SLA or vulnerability disclosure policy, and the terms claim ownership of all scraped data under a perpetual licence.
Scrapingdog
A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string.
Before you call either
Scrapewise
- Call each paid tool with
quote_only: truefirst, then repeat with the sameidempotency_keyso a retry is charged once - Connect to
https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp?toolsets=outcome,adminto build scrapers; a misspelttoolsetsis ignored silently and leaves the 14 data tools - Use an LLM_READ key unless the task needs paid tools or writes, since LLM_FULL has no per-tool consent
- Treat 402 WALLET_INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE as final and ask the user to top up; on 429 wait for Retry-After, and on 429 cost_exceeded wait for the next hour
- Scrape many addresses with one
scrapewise_run_scraper_url_listcall (up to 5,000) and retry with the same name, never one scraper per address
Scrapingdog
- Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says
- Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key
- Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed
- Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Scrapewise or Scrapingdog?
Scrapewise scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on reliability.
Do Scrapewise and Scrapingdog need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Scrapewise and Scrapingdog without installing anything?
Yes. Scrapewise has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp and Scrapingdog at https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape.
Other comparisons with Scrapewise or Scrapingdog
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapingdog
- Bright Data vs Scrapewise
- Bright Data vs Scrapingdog
- Context.dev vs Scrapewise
- Context.dev vs Scrapingdog
- jevcrawl vs Scrapingdog
- Jina Reader vs Scrapewise
- Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Scrapewise
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapewise
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Scrapewise
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapewise
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapeless vs Scrapewise
- Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapewise
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapewise vs Scrapfly
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapewise vs Spider
- Scrapewise vs ZenRows
- Scrapewise vs Zyte API
- Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapingdog vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Scrapingdog vs Zyte API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapewise
- jevcrawl vs Scrapewise
- Diffbot vs Scrapewise
- Diffbot vs Scrapingdog
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrapewise-vs-scrapingdog.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrapewise.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrapewise scrapingdog(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrapewise", "b": "scrapingdog"}at/mcp, no key