Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Scrape.do vs Scrapewise
Scrapewise scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 224 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Cheap bulk fetching through rotating proxies when you call HTTP directly and keep the token server-side.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Token travels in the query string on the main API
Best for Agents that need e-commerce prices, Amazon and Google data, or recurring price monitoring with cleaning and product matching, paid per page in euros.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 45 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 62
- Security & auth, 58 against 23
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 45
- Transparency & trust, 53 against 46
Watch for
No status page, SLA, security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Scrape.do | Scrapewise | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 45 | Scrapewise +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 57 | 79 | Scrapewise +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 86 | Scrapewise +24 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 58 | Scrapewise +35 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Scrapewise +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 79 | Scrapewise +34 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 46 | 53 | Scrapewise +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 43.7/100 | B 62.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Scrape.do | Scrapewise |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Scrape.do | BEBOTECH OÜ |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.scrape.do/ | https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | none | 14 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | ai.scrapewise/scrapewise |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2025-10-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-10-29 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 1 stars, 30 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Scrape.do
$29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.
Scrapewise
Agents get 14 priced MCP tools by default, each with a free quote_only price check and idempotency keys, read-only or full-access keys, and public euro prices from €0.15 per 1,000 plain pages. There is no status page, SLA or vulnerability disclosure policy, and the terms claim ownership of all scraped data under a perpetual licence.
Before you call either
Scrape.do
- Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add
super=trueorrender=trueonly after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 - Pass
output=markdownto get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML - Read
Scrape.do-Request-Costfrom the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass - Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
- Keep URLs with
token=out of logs and shared traces
Scrapewise
- Call each paid tool with
quote_only: truefirst, then repeat with the sameidempotency_keyso a retry is charged once - Connect to
https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp?toolsets=outcome,adminto build scrapers; a misspelttoolsetsis ignored silently and leaves the 14 data tools - Use an LLM_READ key unless the task needs paid tools or writes, since LLM_FULL has no per-tool consent
- Treat 402 WALLET_INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE as final and ask the user to top up; on 429 wait for Retry-After, and on 429 cost_exceeded wait for the next hour
- Scrape many addresses with one
scrapewise_run_scraper_url_listcall (up to 5,000) and retry with the same name, never one scraper per address
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Scrape.do or Scrapewise?
Scrapewise scores 62.5 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Scrape.do and Scrapewise need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Scrape.do and Scrapewise without installing anything?
Yes. Scrape.do has a hosted endpoint at https://api.scrape.do/ and Scrapewise at https://mcp.scrapewise.ai/mcp.
Other comparisons with Scrape.do or Scrapewise
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Scrape.do
- Bright Data vs Scrapewise
- Context.dev vs Scrape.do
- Context.dev vs Scrapewise
- Diffbot vs Scrape.do
- jevcrawl vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Scrape.do
- Jina Reader vs Scrapewise
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs Scrapewise
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrape.do
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapewise
- Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapeless
- Scrape.do vs ScraperAPI
- Scrape.do vs Scrapfly
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog
- Scrape.do vs Spider
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs Zyte API
- ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapeless vs Scrapewise
- ScraperAPI vs Scrapewise
- Scrapewise vs Scrapfly
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingAnt
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapewise vs Scrapingdog
- Scrapewise vs Spider
- Scrapewise vs ZenRows
- Scrapewise vs Zyte API
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapewise
- Apify MCP Server vs Scrapewise
- jevcrawl vs Scrapewise
- Diffbot vs Scrapewise
- Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapewise.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapewise.json - From a terminal
anchor compare scrape-do scrapewise(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "scrape-do", "b": "scrapewise"}at/mcp, no key