# Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog (slim)

> Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 32 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 32 points.

- Jina Reader: E 45.3, rank #402 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jina-reader.min.md
- Scrapingdog: E 39.3, rank #425 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.min.md
- Pick Jina Reader for agent ergonomics (+32), security & auth (+27), maintenance & community (+20). Pick Scrapingdog for payments & pricing (+5).

| Category | Jina Reader | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 43 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 44 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 32 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 57 |