Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
Olostep vs ScrapingBee
Olostep has a score of 63.1 (B) against ScrapingBee's 59.3 (C). Both do scraping. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 27 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Olostep for
- schema & documentation (+24)
- agent ergonomics (+19)
- payments & pricing (+25)
Pick ScrapingBee for
- reliability (+10)
- security & auth (+9)
- maintenance & community (+27)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olostep | ScrapingBee | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 70 | ScrapingBee +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 60 | Olostep +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 87 | 68 | Olostep +19 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 37 | ScrapingBee +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 65 | 40 | Olostep +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 85 | ScrapingBee +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 64 | ScrapingBee +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.1 · B | 59.3 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olostep | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | ScrapingBee (Oxylabs group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.olostep.com | https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | payer tooling only | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 18 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-09-11 |
| Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 132 stars, 49k npm/wk, 72k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Olostep
OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe.
ScrapingBee
Dedicated Google, Amazon, Walmart, YouTube, ChatGPT and Gemini endpoints next to the general HTML API. remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL.
Before you call either
Olostep
- For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor
- Pass
storage.expires_inif you need results after about 7 days - Don't ask for json output without a
parseror anllm_extractschema - Hosted MCP wants
Authorization: Bearer, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools - Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one
ScrapingBee
- Send render_js=false for static pages and files. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1
- Use mode=auto with max_cost=25 to stop it escalating to 75-credit stealth requests
- Keep the MCP URL with ?api_key= out of logs and shared configs
- Back off exponentially on 429 from the MCP, since its concurrency is shared across customers
- Expect 404 and 410 from the target to be billed. Other failures aren't
Other comparisons with Olostep or ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Olostep
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs Olostep
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs Scrape.do
- Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Olostep vs Scrapeless
- Olostep vs Scrapfly
- Olostep vs ScrapingAnt
- Olostep vs Scrapingdog
- Olostep vs Spider
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Apify MCP Server vs Olostep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/olostep.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingbee.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingbee.md