Head to head · Scraping · October 2026 research run
ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
ZenRows has a score of 75.1 (BB) against ScrapingBee's 59.3 (C). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick ScrapingBee for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick ZenRows for
- reliability (+17)
- schema & documentation (+23)
- agent ergonomics (+11)
- payments & pricing (+40)
- transparency & trust (+11)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ScrapingBee | ZenRows | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 87 | ZenRows +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 83 | ZenRows +23 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 79 | ZenRows +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 37 | 41 | ZenRows +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 80 | ZenRows +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 87 | ZenRows +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 75 | ZenRows +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 59.3 · C | 75.1 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ScrapingBee | ZenRows |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ScrapingBee (Oxylabs group) | ZenRows |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/ | https://api.zenrows.com/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | payer tooling only |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 18 | 44 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.ZenRows/zenrows-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-18 |
| Popularity | 132 stars, 49k npm/wk, 72k PyPI/wk | 21 stars, 35k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
ScrapingBee
Dedicated Google, Amazon, Walmart, YouTube, ChatGPT and Gemini endpoints next to the general HTML API. remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL.
ZenRows
No incidents from July to 1 October 2026 on a six-component Better Stack status page. The Fetch API only takes the key in the query string.
Before you call either
ScrapingBee
- Send render_js=false for static pages and files. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1
- Use mode=auto with max_cost=25 to stop it escalating to 75-credit stealth requests
- Keep the MCP URL with ?api_key= out of logs and shared configs
- Back off exponentially on 429 from the MCP, since its concurrency is shared across customers
- Expect 404 and 410 from the target to be billed. Other failures aren't
ZenRows
- Start with mode=auto and let it escalate. Force js_render or premium_proxy only when you know the site needs it
- Prefer the extract tool over scrape when you need fields, since it returns far fewer tokens than a full page
- Read the Concurrency-Remaining response header before fanning out, as extra requests get 429
- Set ZENROWS_AUTO_SIGNUP=false in stdio configs so a missing key fails loudly instead of creating an account
Other comparisons with ScrapingBee or ZenRows
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs ZenRows
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs ZenRows
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs ZenRows
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs ZenRows
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs ZenRows
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs ZenRows
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- Scrapingdog vs ZenRows
- Spider vs ZenRows
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/scrapingbee.json·/api/v1/tools/zenrows.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/scrapingbee-vs-zenrows.md