Head to head · Extraction · October 2026 research run
Qovia vs ScrapingBee
Qovia scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against ScrapingBee's 59.4 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ScrapingBee leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do extraction.
Best web scraping and crawling APIs for AI agents · All 261 scrapers comparisons
Which one, for what
Qovia C
Best for Agents that need structured public data from Chinese platforms (Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Weibo, Bilibili, Kuaishou, Zhihu, WeChat official accounts, Taobao and JD reviews) or the Xingtu and Pugongying creator marketplaces, with TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, X and Reddit beside them, paid per successful call from a prepaid balance.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 86 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 68
- Security & auth, 60 against 37
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 40
Watch for
No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms promise nothing about uptime and the Python client is the only retry guidance beyond Retry-After
Best for Agents that mix general scraping with ready-made Google, Amazon and YouTube endpoints and want spend capped per call.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 77
- Transparency & trust, 65 against 30
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Transparency & trust ScrapingBee +35
Qovia 30
Closed service. The Terms of Service is one paragraph that names no legal entity, address or liability terms, says Delaware law governs and that the page is a summary with the signed agreement governing; the repository's client is MIT. Between the closed and unclear bands (7 of 30). The privacy policy is one paragraph. Account information is used to deliver and bill, personal information is not sold, requests and results are not resold, deletion requests go to the support mailbox, and the agreement governs where it differs. No retention periods, no subprocessors, no DPA, and no statement about the cache the prov.source flag implies; the SECURITY.md repeats the same points (8 of 30). A 410 endpoint_disabled code exists for retired endpoints and the changelog is dated, but there is no deprecation policy or notice period and nothing is marked deprecated (5 of 20). Stripe is named on the pricing page as the card and Alipay processor; no other provider, data location or transfer basis is stated (3 of 20). 7+8+5+3 = 23.
ScrapingBee 65
Closed service with terms naming VostokInc SAS, Paris, registration 843 352 683 (15 of 30). The privacy policy, effective 15 July 2024, keeps prospect and customer data up to 3 years and links a DPA. It doesn't mention the Oxylabs group or say whether scraped content is stored (18 of 30). The Node SDK changelog dates removals, for example youtubeTranscript() dropped in v2.0.0 on 2026-09-01, and the api_key query parameter is marked deprecated. No standing deprecation policy (10 of 20). Processors described by category, located in the US or EU. No named list (8 of 20).
Reliability ScrapingBee +30
Qovia 40
Hosted reading, for the REST API with the MCP server described. No public status page was found. https://qovia.ai/status/ answers 404, status.qovia.ai does not resolve and neither the docs nor the footer links one (0). No readable incident history, so 5 by the rubric (5). Limits are published with numbers on the quickstart's rate-limits section, 60 requests a minute per account before the first top-up and 600 after on a sliding 60-second window, with X-RateLimit-Limit and X-RateLimit-Remaining headers, a 64 KiB body cap, an empty-call throttle (50 calls in 10 minutes with over 80 per cent empty, not found or rejected) and a per-second cap per endpoint without a number (15). Retry-After is declared on too_many_auth_failures, rate_limited, too_many_unbilled, endpoint_busy and upstream_busy, the error table marks the retryable codes, the docs say a 503 endpoint_unavailable carries none and will not clear, and the Python client retries 429 and 503 honouring the header. Every operation is a read, including POST /v1/search, and a failed or timed-out call is refunded, so idempotency keys are not needed (15). No SLA. The terms summary says nothing about uptime and the pricing FAQ excludes outages, rate limits and platform changes from refunds; the 11 September 2026 archived home page advertised a 99.95 per cent enterprise SLA that the current pages have dropped (0). The endpoints are sold and labelled Live on the docs and coverage pages, but every one of the 143 carries x-qovia-status beta in the OpenAPI file, the API version is 0.1.0 and the MCP server reports 0.1.0 (5 of 10). 0+5+15+15+0+5 = 40.
ScrapingBee 70
Hyperping status page at status.scrapingbee.com with 6 components and history (20). In the last 90 days the dedicated APIs (Google, Amazon, Walmart) were down for about 40 minutes on 24 July, the HTML scraper ran degraded for about 24 hours from 28 July, and the Google API was degraded on 22 September. No full core outage of an hour, but the day-long degradation of the main API weighs more than a minor, so we scored between the bands (15 of 30). Concurrency per plan is published, 25 on Hobby to 400 on Business+ (15). 429 means the concurrency limit and isn't billed, failed target requests are retried server-side for up to 30 seconds, and the MCP notes advise exponential backoff. No Retry-After found (10 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10).
Schema & documentation Qovia +26
Qovia 86
An OpenAPI 3.1.0 file (version 0.1.0, 1 MB) is public at qovia.ai/openapi.json with 144 paths and 144 operations, two security schemes, typed query parameters, a response example on every operation and the error responses declared on each. The data payload itself is typed only as object, array or null with per-endpoint examples, and the MCP call_endpoint tool takes a free params object, so 22 of 25 (22). llms.txt (75 KB, one line per endpoint with price and status) and llms-full.txt (331 KB, the whole documentation as text) are served, and the quickstart's billing, limits and error sections are in both (10). Every operation has a summary and a description; most say what the data holds, how to page, which ids to pass, which fields are unavailable and what answers 404 or empty, and the MCP server's instructions say to find, read then call. Guidance on when not to use an endpoint is thin, mostly pointers such as replies coming from another endpoint (16 of 20). 321 parameters, 75 with enums, patterns on ids, min and max on strings and integers, 117 operations with one required parameter and 16 with none, the POST body typed with additionalProperties false, and unknown parameters rejected with 400 (14 of 15). A response example on all 144 operations, 20 error codes with every message variant listed, response headers documented per error, and cURL, Python, JavaScript and raw HTTP samples; the examples are catalogue samples the docs say are not live data (14 of 15). Paths are under /v1, a 410 endpoint_disabled code exists for retired endpoints, and the changelog is dated, but it has two days (21 and 22 October 2026), nothing is marked deprecated and no notice period is stated (10 of 15). 22+10+16+14+14+10 = 86.
ScrapingBee 60
No OpenAPI spec found. Per-endpoint llms files list parameters with types and defaults, and the hosted MCP's schemas weren't visible to us (8 of 25). llms.txt indexes 26 per-endpoint text files written for models (10). The API files explain each parameter's purpose and cost, and a reference-notes file lists 9 known conflicts between its own pages. MCP tool descriptions aren't published (10 of 20). Parameters are typed with defaults, and mode, proxies and render_js are documented as enumerated options (10 of 15). Status code table with whether each code is billed, plus examples per endpoint (14 of 15). The SDKs and CLI keep dated CHANGELOGs. The API has no changelog (8 of 15).
Security & auth Qovia +23
Qovia 60
API keys with scopes chosen at creation (every endpoint, search, every raw endpoint or one of 24 platform groups), an optional expiry, revocation in the console and hashed storage; the docs say the key is read from the Authorization or x-api-key header only, never the URL or a cookie, and 30 failed authentications from one IP in a minute are throttled. No OAuth and no rotation feature beyond creating another key (24 of 30). The whole surface is read-only retrieval, scopes restrict a key to platforms, the two MCP catalogue tools need no key, and the docs and SECURITY.md tell users to give AI tools a separate scoped key (17 of 20). Every response is third-party platform text, and the only related statement is that error messages never contain the data source's own text; nothing on treating returned content as untrusted (3 of 15). request_id is the usage record ID on every answer, the console lists every charge in a usage log, X-Qovia-Charged and X-Qovia-Balance headers report each call, and GET /v1/account returns the key's scopes and balance at no charge; no exportable audit log or per-call endpoint was found (11 of 15). No security.txt on qovia.ai or api.qovia.ai (404), no bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the repository's SECURITY.md names a Telegram handle and a mailbox for reports covering both hosts (5 of 20). 24+17+3+11+5 = 60.
ScrapingBee 37
One API key per account, which the MCP notes say can be revoked (401 on revoked keys). Team management exists. No scopes (20). The api_key query parameter is deprecated but still works, and remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP takes the key only as ?api_key= in its URL, so less 10 (10 of 30). No read-only or scoped key, and the HTML API can send POST requests to target sites. The CLI gates shell post-processing behind an explicit unsafe flag (8 of 20). The official CLI skills and AGENTS.md say scraped output is data, never instructions, and tell the agent to report instruction-like content as a possible prompt injection. The MCP docs say nothing (12 of 15). A Usage API and a local CLI audit log. No per-request log in the docs (7 of 15). No security.txt per the 30 September check, and no bug bounty, disclosure policy or certification found (0 of 20).
Payments & pricing Qovia +15
Qovia 55
No x402, MPP or L402 on Qovia's own endpoints; USDT on TRC-20 is a top-up method from a console session, not a machine payment protocol. The vendor's five Actors on the Apify Store under the profile qovia (Qovia Data, the same Telegram handle and mailbox as the site), such as the Xingtu Actor at $0.01 to $0.06 a section, can be paid through Apify, whose prepaid token is sold over x402, so partial credit for a third-party route on part of the catalogue (10 of 40). Per-call prices are published without a login, per endpoint in the OpenAPI file, llms.txt and the docs, search at $5 and raw endpoints from $0.5 to $19.5 per 1,000, with the tier rule and payment fees stated (20). 50 trial calls for a new account, counted only when a call returns data; the quickstart says to top up when they run out and the docs ask for no card at sign-up, though no account was created to confirm it (20). A person signs up in a browser and creates a key; the MCP catalogue tools work without a key but data calls do not, and the Apify route reaches four platforms without a Qovia account (5 of 20). 10+20+20+5 = 55.
ScrapingBee 40
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Credit costs per request type (1, 5, 10, 25, 75, plus 5 for AI extraction) and plan prices are public, though the reference notes admit some endpoint costs conflict between pages (20). 1,000-credit trial, no card (20). A person signs up in a browser (0).
Agent ergonomics Qovia +9
Qovia 77
API reading. Responses come in fixed page sizes per endpoint, from about 5 comments on Xiaohongshu to 100 Fliggy reviews, with limit only on Bilibili danmaku and no field selection; the record shape is compact and shared across posts, notes and videos. The MCP server loads four tools by default, keeps the catalogue out of context until search_endpoints and get_endpoint are called, and ?tools= selects platforms or everything, which on the MCP reading would score 25 (18 of 25). Cursor pagination with has_more on most lists, search_id on Douyin and Zhihu search, page numbers on Weibo, Xiaohongshu and Bilibili, sort options on several, and the cross-platform search filters by platform, content type, sentiment and whole-day date windows up to 90 days (17 of 20). One error object with 20 codes, request_id on every answer, the retryable set marked, refunded codes separated from never-charged ones, and MCP tool errors carrying error.code, the HTTP status and retry_after_seconds (19 of 20). All calls are reads, failed and empty calls are refunded, Retry-After is declared and the Python client retries; no readOnlyHint or other annotation appears in the vendor's 28 October tools/list snapshot (14 of 20). One required parameter on 117 of 144 operations and defaults set on the server, but the only official SDK is the Python client; Node and curl are examples (9 of 15). 18+17+19+14+9 = 77.
ScrapingBee 68
18 MCP tools (15 of 25). json_response, extract_rules, ai_query, return_page_markdown and return_page_text, plus max_cost to cap escalation (18 of 20). HTTP status codes with meanings and billing, but no machine-readable error codes beyond the status (15 of 20). Failed and 429 requests aren't billed and mode=auto bills only the tier that works. No tool annotations found (8 of 20). Only url is required, but render_js defaults on at 5 credits. Official Python and Node SDKs plus a CLI (12 of 15).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Qovia | ScrapingBee | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 70 | ScrapingBee +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 86 | 60 | Qovia +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 77 | 68 | Qovia +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 37 | Qovia +23 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 40 | Qovia +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 85 | ScrapingBee +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 30 | 65 | ScrapingBee +35 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.2/100 | C 59.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Qovia | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Qovia | ScrapingBee (Oxylabs group) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.qovia.ai | https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/ |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under a one-paragraph Terms of Service summary that defers to a signed agreement. The qovia/qovia-mcp repository (setup guide, examples, Python client) and the qovia package on PyPI are MIT; the service's source is not public | none |
| Tools exposed | 141 | 18 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | ai.qovia/qovia | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | 2024-07-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | not read yet | 2024-07-15 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 132 stars, 49k npm/wk, 72k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 4/5 (2) |
How the scores have moved
Qovia
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Qovia
An OpenAPI 3.1 file with 144 operations, one envelope and 20 error codes, per-endpoint prices with failed and empty calls refunded, scoped keys and a four-tool MCP server that keeps the catalogue out of context. No status page, no legal entity, one-paragraph terms and privacy pages, and a product ten days old at the check.
ScrapingBee
Dedicated Google, Amazon, Walmart, YouTube, ChatGPT and Gemini endpoints next to the general HTML API. remote-mcp.txt says the hosted MCP only takes the key as ?api_key= in its URL.
Before you call either
Qovia
- Send
Authorization: Bearer sk-qovia-...to https://api.qovia.ai and checkmeta.emptyon every HTTP 200;datamay benullor an empty structure and nothing is charged for it. - Branch on
error.code, never onmessage. Retry onlyrate_limited,too_many_unbilled,endpoint_busy,upstream_busyandtoo_many_auth_failuresafterRetry-After;endpoint_unavailablehas none and will not clear. - Stay under 60 requests a minute (600 after the first top-up) across every key on the account, and keep empty or not-found calls under 80 per cent of the last 10 minutes or expect 429
too_many_unbilled. - Pass the previous page's
cursor(andsearch_idon Douyin and Zhihu search) back unchanged and stop whenhas_moreis false; each page is a separate charge, and unknown parameters answer 400. - For MCP, connect to https://api.qovia.ai/mcp over Streamable HTTP; call
search_endpointsthenget_endpointbeforecall_endpoint, or add?tools=douyin,kuaishoufor typed direct tools. Catalogue tools need no key.
ScrapingBee
- Send render_js=false for static pages and files. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1
- Use mode=auto with max_cost=25 to stop it escalating to 75-credit stealth requests
- Keep the MCP URL with ?api_key= out of logs and shared configs
- Back off exponentially on 429 from the MCP, since its concurrency is shared across customers
- Expect 404 and 410 from the target to be billed. Other failures aren't
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Qovia or ScrapingBee?
Qovia scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against ScrapingBee's 59.4 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ScrapingBee leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Do Qovia and ScrapingBee need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Qovia and ScrapingBee without installing anything?
Yes. Qovia has a hosted endpoint at https://api.qovia.ai and ScrapingBee at https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1/.
Other comparisons with Qovia or ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs Qovia
- Firecrawl MCP vs Qovia
- Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee
- Apify MCP Server vs ScrapingBee
- Bright Data vs ScrapingBee
- Context.dev vs ScrapingBee
- jevcrawl vs ScrapingBee
- Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee
- Olostep vs ScrapingBee
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingBee
- Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee
- ScraperAPI vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapewise vs ScrapingBee
- Scrapfly vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingAnt vs ScrapingBee
- ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog
- ScrapingBee vs Spider
- ScrapingBee vs ZenRows
- ScrapingBee vs Zyte API
- Context.dev vs Qovia
- Diffbot vs Qovia
- Diffbot vs ScrapingBee
- jevcrawl vs Qovia
- Olostep vs Qovia
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Qovia
- Qovia vs ScrapeAtlas
- Qovia vs ScrapeGraphAI
- Qovia vs ScraperAPI
- Qovia vs Scrapewise
- Qovia vs Scrapfly
- Qovia vs ScrapingAnt
- Qovia vs Scrapingdog
- Qovia vs Spider
- Qovia vs ZenRows
- Qovia vs Zyte API
- ScrapeAtlas vs ScrapingBee
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qovia-vs-scrapingbee.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qovia.json·/api/v1/tools/scrapingbee.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qovia scrapingbee(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qovia", "b": "scrapingbee"}at/mcp, no key