# Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI (slim)

> ScrapeGraphAI has a score of 68.3 (B) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai.md (~1,700 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

ScrapeGraphAI has a score of 68.3 (B) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points.

- Olostep: B 63.1, rank #210 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/olostep.min.md
- ScrapeGraphAI: B 68.3, rank #128 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapegraphai.min.md
- Pick Olostep for agent ergonomics (+15). Pick ScrapeGraphAI for security & auth (+11), payments & pricing (+25), maintenance & community (+12).

| Category | Olostep | ScrapeGraphAI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 64 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 88 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 87 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 28 | 39 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 65 | 90 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 58 | 70 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 60 | 61 |