# Jina Reader vs Scrape.do > Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.md (~1,600 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Jina Reader has a score of 45.3 (E) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points. - Jina Reader: grade E, 45.3/100, rank #402 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jina-reader.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/jina-reader.json - Scrape.do: grade E, 44/100, rank #406 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrape-do.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json ## Which one, for what Pick Jina Reader for reliability (+20), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+9), maintenance & community (+20), transparency & trust (+12). Pick Scrape.do for schema & documentation (+14). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Jina Reader | Scrape.do | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 60 | 40 | Jina Reader +20 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 43 | 57 | Scrape.do +14 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 76 | 62 | Jina Reader +14 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 32 | 23 | Jina Reader +9 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 35 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 45 | Jina Reader +20 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 61 | 49 | Jina Reader +12 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **45.3 · E** | **44 · E** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Jina Reader | Scrape.do | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Jina AI (Elastic) | Scrape.do | | Hosted endpoint | `https://r.jina.ai/` | `https://api.scrape.do/` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | none | | Tools exposed | none | none | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | not listed | | Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-31 | | Popularity | 12k stars | 2 npm/wk | | Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Jina Reader.** One URL prefix, no key needed, Markdown back. No price per token in any currency on the public page. **Scrape.do.** $29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API. ## Before you call either ### Jina Reader 1. Prefix the URL, `https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com`, and read the Markdown 2. Send `x-max-tokens` to cap a page, or `x-token-budget` to refuse one that's too big 3. Use `x-target-selector` when you need one part of a page 4. Keyless is 20 requests a minute and can't search. Add a key for loops or s.jina.ai 5. Send `x-no-cache: true` when a page may have changed or a blocked response got cached ### Scrape.do 1. Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add `super=true` or `render=true` only after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 2. Pass `output=markdown` to get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML 3. Read `Scrape.do-Request-Cost` from the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass 4. Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish 5. Keep URLs with `token=` out of logs and shared traces ## Other comparisons with Jina Reader or Scrape.do - [Bright Data vs Jina Reader](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-jina-reader.md) - [Bright Data vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Jina Reader vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-olostep.md) - [Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Jina Reader vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Jina Reader vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Jina Reader vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Jina Reader vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-zenrows.md) - [Olostep vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrape.do vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Scrape.do vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-zenrows.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-jina-reader.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrape-do.md)