# Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP (slim)

> Tavily API + MCP has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Firecrawl MCP's 75.5 (BB). Both do web search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-tavily-mcp.md (~2,000 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-tavily-mcp.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-tavily-mcp
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Tavily API + MCP has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Firecrawl MCP's 75.5 (BB). Both do web search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- Tavily API + MCP: BB 77.2, rank #20 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tavily-mcp.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for agent ergonomics (+11), security & auth (+15), transparency & trust (+11). Pick Tavily API + MCP for reliability (+20), payments & pricing (+25).

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | Tavily API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 90 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 89 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 81 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 52 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 75 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 85 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 65 |