# Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog > Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.md (~2,000 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points. - Firecrawl MCP: grade BB, 75.5/100, rank #34 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/firecrawl-mcp.json - Scrapingdog: grade E, 39.3/100, rank #425 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrapingdog.json ## Which one, for what Pick Firecrawl MCP for reliability (+8), schema & documentation (+45), agent ergonomics (+48), security & auth (+62), payments & pricing (+10), maintenance & community (+42), transparency & trust (+19). Pick Scrapingdog for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapingdog | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 70 | 62 | Firecrawl MCP +8 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 43 | Firecrawl MCP +45 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 92 | 44 | Firecrawl MCP +48 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 67 | 5 | Firecrawl MCP +62 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 50 | 40 | Firecrawl MCP +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 87 | 45 | Firecrawl MCP +42 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 76 | 57 | Firecrawl MCP +19 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | | | **Total** | | **75.5 · BB** | **39.3 · E** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapingdog | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | MCP server | HTTP API | | Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp` | `https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape` | | Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | MIT | none | | Tools exposed | 26 | 35 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server` | `io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp` | | Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-07-31 | | Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Firecrawl MCP.** Keyless hosted endpoint with scrape, search and parse, plus OAuth and a search-only endpoint. No x402 or other machine payment. **Scrapingdog.** A plain request is 1 credit, about $0.20 per 1,000 on Lite. API key only travels in the URL query string. ## Before you call either ### Firecrawl MCP 1. Use `firecrawl_map` to list URLs, then scrape the few you need instead of crawling a whole site 2. On the keyless endpoint only scrape, search and parse work. A 429 carries a `signup_url` for the human 3. Ask for markdown only. JSON, question and highlight formats add 4 credits a page 4. Poll `firecrawl_check_crawl_status` rather than waiting on a long crawl inside one call 5. Check the URL before scraping. Dead pages still cost a credit ### Scrapingdog 1. Add dynamic=false unless the page needs JavaScript. It cuts the cost from 5 credits to 1, whatever the MCP description says 2. Keep request URLs out of logs, since they carry api_key 3. Set client timeouts above 60 seconds and retry on 429 or timeout. Failures aren't billed 4. Prefer the parsed endpoints (Google, Amazon) over scraping the raw page when one exists ## Other comparisons with Firecrawl MCP or Scrapingdog - [Bright Data vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Olostep vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrapfly vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapfly-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapingant-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [ScrapingBee vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapingbee-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrapingdog vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapingdog-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Scrapingdog vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapingdog-vs-zenrows.md) - [Brave Search API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brave-search-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp.md) - [Bright Data vs Firecrawl MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-firecrawl-mcp.md) - [Exa API + MCP vs Firecrawl MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/exa-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Jina Reader](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-jina-reader.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Linkup](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-linkup.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-olostep.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Parallel Search and Task APIs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-parallel-search-api.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs SearchAPI.io](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-searchapi-io.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs SerpApi](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-serpapi.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Serper](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-serper.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Tavily API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-tavily-mcp.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Valyu](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-valyu.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs You.com APIs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-you-com-api.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-zenrows.md)