# Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapingdog (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.md (~2,000 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 62 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- Scrapingdog: E 39.3, rank #425 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for reliability (+8), schema & documentation (+45), agent ergonomics (+48), security & auth (+62), payments & pricing (+10), maintenance & community (+42), transparency & trust (+19). Pick Scrapingdog for nothing in particular.

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 44 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 57 |