Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Lusha API + MCP has a score of 62.6 (B) against LeadMagic API + MCP's 60.5 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points.
Which one, for what
Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+10)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
Pick Lusha API + MCP for
- reliability (+20)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+17)
- transparency & trust (+18)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LeadMagic API + MCP | Lusha API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 75 | Lusha API + MCP +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 93 | 83 | LeadMagic API + MCP +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 61 | 51 | LeadMagic API + MCP +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 59 | LeadMagic API + MCP +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Lusha API + MCP +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 82 | Lusha API + MCP +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 84 | Lusha API + MCP +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 60.5 · C | 62.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LeadMagic API + MCP | Lusha API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | LeadMagic | Lusha |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.leadmagic.io | https://api.lusha.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 48 | 50 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.lusha.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-23 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
LeadMagic API + MCP
RFC 9457 problem-details errors with request_id, and Retry-After on 429. No free tier or trial credits, plans from $99 a month.
Lusha API + MCP
API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month. At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches.
Before you call either
LeadMagic API + MCP
- Call
preview_costbefore bulk work. It's free - Read
X-Credits-Remainingafter each call instead of polling the balance - Treat 402 as out of credits and wait out Retry-After on 429
- Keep credit-free search under 13,333 calls a day per account
- Retry
unknownvalidations later. They cost nothing
Lusha API + MCP
- Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
- Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
- Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
- Use
/v3/lookalike/contactsfor contact lookalikes - Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day
Other comparisons with LeadMagic API + MCP or Lusha API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/leadmagic.json·/api/v1/tools/lusha.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/leadmagic-vs-lusha.md