Head to head · Lead enrichment · October 2026 research run
Lusha API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
ZeroBounce and Lusha API + MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.4 (B) and 62.3 (B). Lusha API + MCP leads on reliability, schema & documentation, payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do lead enrichment.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 231 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Sales teams that want contact and company enrichment, signals and prospecting from one vendor, with a free plan to start.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 75
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 54
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 63
Watch for
At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches
Best for Email verification before outreach, the verification-first listing in lead-data.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 51
- Security & auth, 65 against 59
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Lusha API + MCP loses 6 points for them
Watch for
Every documented example sends the key as an api_key query parameter
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Schema & documentation Lusha API + MCP +29
Lusha API + MCP 83
OpenAPI files per the 30 September check (25). llms.txt (10). Reference pages explain credit use per call with worked examples (15 of 20). Typed inputs (12 of 15). Standard HTTP codes and examples, no error catalogue found (10 of 15). Semantic versioning with a support matrix and a dated changelog. Version numbers run out of order (2.8.0 dated after 2.12.0), and breaking changes shipped in minor versions (11 of 15).
ZeroBounce 54
No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract found; a Postman collection is linked (5 of 25). llms.txt lists marketing pages, and the docs have no Markdown twins (5 of 10). Endpoint pages explain timing, credits and when to use batch or file APIs (14 of 20). Parameter tables and listed status and sub-status values, including the ai_agent_mailbox sub-status added in July 2026 (10 of 15). Examples per endpoint, a sandbox and an error-code page (12 of 15). v2 paths, an API migration page and dated maintenance notices on the status page, with no API changelog (8 of 15). 5+5+14+10+12+8 = 54.
Agent ergonomics ZeroBounce +18
Lusha API + MCP 51
The hosted MCP has 50 tools across enrichment, prospecting, signals, lookalikes, buying groups, tables, CRM export and account, with no toolsets found (5). Bulk calls take up to 25 records (8 of 25). Prospecting filters with a per-company cap and exact totals (18 of 20). Standard codes and back-off advice for 429 (12 of 20). Every request costs at least 1 credit even with no match, so retries aren't free, and the MCP writes to tables and CRM exports with no annotations found (6 of 20). No official SDKs found (7 of 15).
ZeroBounce 69
A compact JSON result per address, batch validation and a file API for lists (18 of 25). Little to paginate; file status and results by file id (10 of 20). Status and sub-status codes say why an address failed, and the error page explains 400, 404 and 429 (14 of 20). Unknown results are free and safe to retry; repeated validations are charged again (12 of 20). Many official SDK wrappers and an MCP server, with few required parameters (15). 18+10+14+12+15 = 69.
Transparency & trust Lusha API + MCP +17
Lusha API + MCP 80
Closed service with terms naming Lusha Systems Inc. (15). The privacy notice (September 2026) covers people in the database, names its sources, including a community programme in which members share contacts from their CRM, email headers and calendars, plus data brokers and public APIs, relies on legitimate interest, names a DPO and an EU and UK representative, and takes removal requests at lusha.com/privacy-center/request-removal. Retention for contacts has no period (24 of 30). A support matrix exists, but the Decision Makers API was removed 88 days after launch with no notice period found (8 of 20). Subprocessor list published and data stored on AWS in the US (20).
ZeroBounce 63
Closed service under terms naming Hertza L.L.C. (ZeroBounce) of Nevada; SDKs and MCP server open source (15 of 30). The data protection page says uploaded data is never kept more than 30 days, the privacy policy of 30 June 2026 keeps account data 'as long as needed', and EU and UK DPAs are published (22 of 30). An API migration page, with no dated deprecation policy (6 of 20). A sub-processor list naming each provider and the data exchanged (16 of 20). 15+22+6+16 = 59.
Maintenance & community Lusha API + MCP +12
Lusha API + MCP 82
Version 2.20.1 on 2026-10-29 (30). Fourteen dated versions from 2.7.0 on 5 August to 2.20.1 on 29 October 2026 (20). Detailed public changelog and support, issue handling not visible (12 of 15). Listed in the official MCP registry as com.lusha.mcp/mcp 1.0.0, a domain-verified namespace, active since 18 June 2026 (15). No packages to judge (5 of 10). 30+20+12+15+5 = 82.
ZeroBounce 70
Closed service. The JavaScript SDK 3.0.0 was published on 25 October 2026 (30). No API changelog; the dated changes found in 90 days are that release and status-page notices, fewer than three releases (10 of 20). Support by email and 24/7 chat per the docs, a public status page; replies not tested (10 of 15). Official SDKs in many languages and an MCP server (15). Package health not checked (5 of 10). 30+10+10+15+5 = 70.
Reliability Lusha API + MCP +10
Lusha API + MCP 85
Atlassian Statuspage at status.lusha.com with a Lusha API component and AWS us-east-1 components (20). The history feed (history.atom) lists one incident from 4 August to 2 November 2026, errors and incomplete results in Prospecting company search for some users on 7 August (20:44 to 21:33 IDT), partial and so minor; the 3 August API error incident falls just outside the window (20). Limits per plan, from 40 a minute and 100 a day on Free to 300 a minute and 50,000 a day on Scale (15). 429 documented with advice to back off exponentially, no Retry-After mentioned (10 of 15). The trust centre states a 99.95 per cent uptime SLA (10). Generally available (10). 20+20+15+10+10+10 = 85.
ZeroBounce 75
Hosted lines. Statuspage at status.zerobounce.net with API, API-US, API-EU, Bulk API, website and Cloudflare components (20). The incident feed for 8 August to 6 November shows a 6-minute members platform disruption on 9 September, about 3 minutes of reduced EU API availability on 1 October, and a file upload issue on 26 October resolved within 6 minutes, all minor (20). Limits published per endpoint group with numbers and block lengths (15). 429 is documented with advice to throttle, but no Retry-After, and a block can last an hour or a day (10 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20+20+15+10+0+10 = 75.
Security & auth ZeroBounce +6
Lusha API + MCP 59
REST takes an api_key header. Every user gets a key, admins can mint more and cap each one's monthly credits, and a key a user makes for themselves has no cap of its own. OAuth for the MCP in Claude, ChatGPT and Codex, x-api-key elsewhere. No endpoint scopes found (22 of 30). Credit caps limit damage, but the MCP isn't read-only and writes to workspace tables and CRM exports (8 of 20). Signals and conversation data carry some free text, no injection guidance found (5 of 15). Usage endpoint, no per-call log found (8 of 15). SOC 2 Type II and five ISO certifications claimed in the trust centre, ISO 27701 named in the privacy notice, security.txt valid (Expires 1 May 2027, read on 2 November), no bug bounty found (16 of 20).
ZeroBounce 65
Several named keys besides a Master key, regeneration, deactivation and IP whitelists (25), less 10 because the documented calls carry the key in the api_key query string (15 of 30). Validation only reads, though file and list endpoints can delete uploads (12 of 20). Results are structured status codes with little free text (10 of 15). API usage and dashboard statistics endpoints (10 of 15). SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, continuous testing with Intigriti and penetration testing with BitSentinel; no public disclosure policy found (18 of 20). 15+12+10+10+18 = 65.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lusha API + MCP | ZeroBounce | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 75 | Lusha API + MCP +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 54 | Lusha API + MCP +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 51 | 69 | ZeroBounce +18 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 59 | 65 | ZeroBounce +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 35 | Lusha API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 70 | Lusha API + MCP +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 80 | 63 | Lusha API + MCP +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -6 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.3/100 | B 62.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lusha API + MCP | ZeroBounce |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Lusha | Hertza L.L.C. (ZeroBounce) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.lusha.com | https://api.zerobounce.net/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under ZeroBounce's terms of use; SDKs and the MCP server are open source |
| Tools exposed | 50 | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | com.lusha.mcp/mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-25 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-05-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | 2026-06-30 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
How the scores have moved
ZeroBounce
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Lusha API + MCP
API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month, and a semantic-versioned changelog with frequent dated releases. At least 1 credit is charged per request even when nothing matches, and since 5 October 2026 Enrich Contacts can return partial waterfall results with a job to poll, a change announced the day it shipped.
ZeroBounce
ZeroBounce's v2 API verifies emails with detailed status and sub-status codes, publishes per-endpoint limits, a Statuspage with short incidents only in the last 90 days, SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, and $0.0195 per email at the smallest pack. The documented key travels in the query string, and there is no OpenAPI contract.
Before you call either
Lusha API + MCP
- Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
- Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
- Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
- When Enrich Contacts returns a
job, pollGET /v3/contacts/jobs/{jobId}everyretryAfterseconds untilcomplete,expiredorfailed. Polling costs no credits - Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day
ZeroBounce
- Use the regional host (api-us or api-eu) that matches the data, and test with the sandbox addresses, which spend no credits
- Set
timeout(3 to 60 seconds); slow mail servers return unknown, which is free to retry later - Stay under 80,000 validations per 10 seconds and avoid repeated bad requests, which block the key for an hour
- Use the bulk file API for large lists instead of looping on /v2/validate
- Keep the key out of logs; the API takes it only as
api_keyin the URL
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lusha API + MCP or ZeroBounce?
ZeroBounce and Lusha API + MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.4 (B) and 62.3 (B). Lusha API + MCP leads on reliability, schema & documentation, payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Do Lusha API + MCP and ZeroBounce need an API key?
Lusha API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ZeroBounce needs an API key.
Can an agent call Lusha API + MCP and ZeroBounce without installing anything?
Yes. Lusha API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.lusha.com and ZeroBounce at https://api.zerobounce.net/v2.
Other comparisons with Lusha API + MCP or ZeroBounce
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clay vs Lusha API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Dievio vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs People Data Labs
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Lusha API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Clay vs ZeroBounce
- Clearbit vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clearbit vs ZeroBounce
- Coresignal API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Crustdata API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Databar vs Lusha API + MCP
- Databar vs ZeroBounce
- Dievio vs ZeroBounce
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Explorium AgentSource vs ZeroBounce
- FullContact vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullContact vs ZeroBounce
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Gojiberry vs ZeroBounce
- People Data Labs vs ZeroBounce
- Prospeo API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- ZeroBounce vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- Fuse MCP vs ZeroBounce
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs ZeroBounce
- RocketReach API vs ZeroBounce
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lusha-vs-zerobounce.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lusha.json·/api/v1/tools/zerobounce.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lusha zerobounce(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lusha", "b": "zerobounce"}at/mcp, no key